Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Is Globalisation Yesterday’s News?


Globalisation is now a fashionable topic of historical research. Books and articles routinely use the term, though often in a loose manner that has yet to realise the full potential of the subject. The question arises as to whether globalisation, as currently applied by historians, is sufficiently robust to resist inevitable changes in historiographical fashion. The fact that globalisation is a process and not a single theory opens the way, not only to over-general applications of the term, but also to rich research possibilities derived in particular from other social sciences. One such prospect, which ought to be at the centre of all historians’ interests, is how to categorise the evolution of the process. This question, which has yet to stimulate the lively debate it needs, is explored here by identifying three successive phases or sequences between the eighteenth century and the present, and joining them to the history of the empires that were their principal agents. These phases, termed proto-globalisation, modern globalisation, and postcolonial globalisation provide the context for reviewing the history of the West, including the United States, and in principle of the wider world too.

Corresponding author
Hide All

This is an expanded and revised version of a keynote lecture delivered at the University of Western Sydney on 20 October 2013. The approach is given extended treatment in the author’s book, American Empire. Partly for this reason, citations are kept here to a minimum.

Hide All
Manfred Berg . “Black Rights and Liberal Anti-Communism: The NAACP in the Early Cold War.” Journal of American History 94 (2007): 7596.

Michael Broers , Peter Hicks and Agustín Guimerá , eds. The Napoleonic Empire and the New European Political Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Regina Grafe and Maria Alejandra Irigoin . “A Stakeholder Empire: The Political Economy of Spanish Imperial Rule in America.” Economic History Review 65 (2012): 609651.

A. G Hopkins ., ed. Global History: Interactions Between the Universal and the Local. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

A. G. Hopkins . “Rethinking Decolonisation.” Past & Present 200 (2008): 211247.

Paul Kramer . “Power and Connection: Imperial Histories of the United States in the World.” American Historical Review 116 (2011): 13481391.

Michael Lang . “Globalization and its History.” Journal of Modern History 78 (2006): 899931.

Spencer A. Leonard ‘A Theatre of Disputes’: The East India Company Election of 1764 as the Founding of British India.” Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History 42 (2014): 593624.

Carlos Marichal . Bankruptcy of Empire; Mexican Silver and the Wars between Spain, Britain and France, 1760–1810. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

P. J Marshall . “British Society in India under the East India Company.” Modern Asian Studies 31 (1997): 89108.

José Jurado Sánchez . “Military Expenditure, Spending Capacity and Budget Constraints in Eighteenth-Century Spain and Britain.” Revista de Historia Económica 27 (2009): 141174.

Pierre-Yves Saunier . Transnational History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Jay Sexton . “The Global View of the United States.” Historical Journal 48 (2005): 261276.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

  • ISSN: 0165-1153
  • EISSN: 2041-2827
  • URL: /core/journals/itinerario
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 86 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 240 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th April 2017 - 26th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.