Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:16:10.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dirichlet and Quasi-Bernoulli Laws for Perpetuities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2016

Paweł Hitczenko*
Affiliation:
Drexel University
Gérard Letac*
Affiliation:
Université Paul Sabatier
*
Postal address: Department of Mathematics, Drexel University, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA.
∗∗ Postal address: Laboratoire de Statistique et Probabilités, Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France. Email address: gerard.letac@alsatis.net.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let X, B, and Y be the Dirichlet, Bernoulli, and beta-independent random variables such that X ~ D(a0, …, ad), Pr(B = (0, …, 0, 1, 0, …, 0)) = ai / a with a = ∑i=0dai, and Y ~ β(1, a). Then, as proved by Sethuraman (1994), X ~ X(1 - Y) + BY. This gives the stationary distribution of a simple Markov chain on a tetrahedron. In this paper we introduce a new distribution on the tetrahedron called a quasi-Bernoulli distribution Bk(a0, …, ad) with k an integer such that the above result holds when B follows Bk(a0, …, ad) and when Y ~ β(k, a). We extend it even more generally to the case where X and B are random probabilities such that X is Dirichlet and B is quasi-Bernoulli. Finally, the case where the integer k is replaced by a positive number c is considered when a0 = · · · = ad = 1.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Applied Probability Trust 

Footnotes

Partially supported by the Simons Foundation (grant number #208766).

This author thanks the Fields Institute for its hospitality during the preparation of this paper.

References

Ambrus, G., Kevei, P. and Vígh, V. (2012). The diminishing segment process. Statist. Prob. Lett. 82, 191195.Google Scholar
Arizmendi, O. and Pérez-Abreu, V. (2010). On the non-classical infinite divisibility of power semicircle distributions. Commun. Stoch. Anal. 4, 161178.Google Scholar
Chamayou, J.-F. and Letac, G. (1991). Explicit stationary distributions for compositions of random functions and products of random matrices. J. Theoret. Prob. 4, 336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamayou, J.-F. and Letac, G. (1994). A transient random walk on stochastic matrices with Dirichlet distributions. Ann. Prob. 22, 424430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaconis, P. and Kemperman, J. (1996). Some new tools for Dirichlet priors. In Bayesian Statistics 5, Oxford University Press, pp. 97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T. S. (1973). A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. 1, 209230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, C. M. and Maller, R. A. (2000). Stability of perpetuities. Ann. Prob. 28, 11951218.Google Scholar
Kotz, S., Balakrishnan, N. and Johnson, N. L. (2000). Continuous Multivariate Distributions, Vol. 1, 2nd edn. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Letac, G. and Massam, H. (1998). A formula on multivariate Dirichlet distribution. Statist. Prob. Lett. 38, 247253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijoi, A. and Prünster, I. (2009). Distributional properties of means of random probability measures. Statist. Surveys 3, 4795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sethuraman, J. (1994). A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors. Statistica Sinica 4, 639650.Google Scholar