Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T00:37:59.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environment, Law, and Democracy in India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2011

Get access

Extract

Some years ago, in his contribution to a collection of essays on the Supreme Court and the Indian Constitution, Pratap Bhanu Mehta emphasized the political significance of the Court, saying, “there is not a single important issue of political life in India that has not been, by accident or design, profoundly shaped by its interventions … the courts participate and collaborate in governing India” (Mehta 2006, 162). How exactly might this happen? In beginning to explore answers to this question, I want to focus on the formation of a distinct environmental jurisprudence and its relationship to the changing and dynamic qualities of a democratic polity in India. And in formulating my analysis I draw here on my current work on courts and the environment in India or how the environment came to be a legal object in India over the last century.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

List of References

Abraham, CM. 1999. Environmental Jurisprudence in India. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Akhil Bharat Goseva Sangh v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Supp (1) SCC 370 (1995).Google Scholar
Almitra Patel v. Union of India, 2 SCC 679; AIR 2000 SC 1256 (2000).Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael. 1995. “The Conquest of Smoke: Legislation and Pollution in Colonial Calcutta.” In Nature & Culture and Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia, edited by Arnold, David and Guha, Ramachandra, 293335. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Michael. 1998. “Individual Rights to Environmental Protection in India.” In Human Rights Approaches to Environmental Protection, edited by Boyle, Alan and Anderson, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board v. Professor MV Nayudu, 2 SCC 718 (1999).Google Scholar
Ashok v. Union of India, 5 SCC 10, AIR 1997 SC 2298 (1997).Google Scholar
Austin, Granville. 1999. Working a Democratic Constitution: A History of the Indian Experience. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Balasubramaniam, L. 1994. “Quest for an Environmental Value System.” Economic and Political Weekly 29(22): 13291330.Google Scholar
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. State of Tamil Nadu, Supp SCC 541 (1986).Google Scholar
Bandhua Mukti Morcha v. Union of India, 3 SCC 161, 183, 184; 1984 SCC (L&S) 389 (1984).Google Scholar
Banwasi Sewa Ashram v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 4 SCC 753 (1986).Google Scholar
Banwasi Sewa Ashram v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1987 SC 374 (1987).Google Scholar
Baviskar, Amita. 2005 “Red in Tooth and Claw? Looking for Class in Struggles over Nature.” In Social Movements in India, edited by Ray, Raka and Katzenstein, Mary, 161178. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 1996. “Judicial Activism, Legal Education and Researching Globalizing India” (3 parts). Mainstream 34: February 24, March 2, March 9.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra. 2002. “The (Im)possibility of Constitutional Justice: Seismographic Notes on Indian Constitutionalism.” In India's Living Constitution: Ideas, Practices, Controversies, edited by Hasan, Zoya, Sridharan, E., and Sudarshan, R., 3163. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Bhargava, Rajeev. 2008. “Introduction: Outline of a Political Theory of the Indian Constitution.” In Politics and Ethics of Indian Constitution, edited by Bhargava, Rajeev, 140. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cantonments Act (1924).Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 1993. The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Partha. 2006. Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, Rohin. 2004. “Environmental Hearings: Participatory Forums or Mere Procedure?Economic and Political Weekly 39(42): 46164619.Google Scholar
Chetriya Pradushan Mukti Sangharsh Samiti v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 4 SCC 449, 452a; AIR 1990 SC 2060 (1990).Google Scholar
Church of God (Full Gospel) in India v. KKR Majaz Colony Welfare Association, 7 SCC 282; 2000 SCC (Cri) 1350; AIR 2000 SC 2773 (2000).Google Scholar
Consumer Education and Research Society v. Union of India, 2 SCC 599; AIR 2000 SC 995 (2000).Google Scholar
Coyle, Sean and Morrow, Karen. 2004. The Philosophical Foundations of Environmental Law: Power, Ethics, and Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Jyotirindra. 2001. “India's federal Design and Multicultural National construction.” In The Success of India's Democracy, edited by Kohli, Atul, 4977. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Datta, Ritwick and Yadav, Bhupender. 2007. The Supreme Court on Forest Conservation. Delhi: Universal Law Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Delhi Municipal Corporation Act (1957).Google Scholar
Dembowski, Hans. 1999. “Courts, Civil Society, and Public Sphere: Environmental Litigation in Calcutta.” Economic and Political Weekly 34(1/2): 4956.Google Scholar
Desai, Ashok and Muralidhar, S. 2000. “Public Interest Litigation: Potential and Problems.” In Supreme but not Infallible: Essays in Honor of the Supreme Court of India, edited by Kirpal, B N, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Desai, Ashok. 2002. Environmental Jurisprudence. Allahabad: Modern Law House.Google Scholar
Dias, Ayesha. 1994. “Judicial Activism in the Development and Enforcement of Environmental Law.” Journal of Environmental Law 6(2): 243262.Google Scholar
DK Joshi v. Chief Secretary Government of Uttar Pradesh and Others, 9 SCC 344 (1999).Google Scholar
Dr. BL Wadehra v. Union of India, 2 SCC 594 (1996).Google Scholar
Environment Protection Act (1986).Google Scholar
Environmental Awareness Forum and TN Godavarman Thirumalpad v. Union of India (1997).Google Scholar
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Factories Act (1987).Google Scholar
Faure, Michael and Raja, A.V.. 2010. “Effectiveness of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in India: Determining the Key Variables.” Fordham Environmental Law Review 21: 239295.Google Scholar
Forest Case Update. 2007 (38 September).Google Scholar
Forest Conservation Act (1980).Google Scholar
Forest Rights Act (2006).Google Scholar
Forward Construction Company v. Prabhat Mandal, 1 SCC 100, 103, 104; AIR 1986 SC 391 (1986).Google Scholar
Government of Gujarat. 1971. Report of the Legal Aid Committee. Chairman Justice P. N. Bhagwati. Government Central Press, Government of Gujarat. Gandhinagar, India.Google Scholar
Government of India Act (1935).Google Scholar
Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs. 1973. Report of the Expert Committee on Legal Aid: Processual Justice to the People. Chairman V. R. Krishna Iyer. Department of Legal Affairs, Ministry of Law, Justice & Company Affairs. Government of India Controller of Publications: New Delhi.Google Scholar
Government of India, Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs. 1977. Report on National Juridicare: Equal Justice – Social Justice. Chairman Justice P. N. Bhagwati New Delhi: Controller of Publications.Google Scholar
Gramin Sewa Sanstha v. State of Madhya Pradesh, Supp SCC 578 (1986).Google Scholar
Guha, Ramachandra. 2007. India After Gandhi: This History of the World's Largest Democracy. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. “Struggles for Recognition in the Democratic State.” In The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, edited by Habermas, Jürgen, 203236. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Thomas Blom. 2001. Wages of Violence: Naming and Identity in Postcolonial Bombay. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hazareesingh, Sandip. 2000. “The quest for urban citizenship: Civic rights, public opinion, and colonial resistance in early twentieth-century Bombay.” Modern Asian Studies 34(4): 797829.Google Scholar
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, 3 SCC 212 (1996).Google Scholar
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, 3 SCC 77, AIR 1995 SC 2252 (1995).Google Scholar
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 2298 (1997).Google Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christoph. 2003. India's Silent Revolution: The Rise of the Lower Castes in North India. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Janoski, Thomas. 1998. Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations in Liberal, Traditional and Social Democratic Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kakar, Sudhir. 1996. The Colors of Violence: Cultural Identities, Religion and Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kanti Bhadra Shah v. State of West Bengal, 1 SC 722 (2000).Google Scholar
Khilnani, Sunil. 2002. “The Indian Constitution and Democracy.” In India's Living Constitution: Ideas, Practices, Controversies, edited by Hasan, Zoya, Sridharan, E., and Sudarshan, R., 6482. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 2001. “Introduction.” In The Success of India's Democracy, edited by Kohli, Atul, 119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Kanchi. 2009. “Delhi High Court Overturns Environmental Mockery.” India Together, December 12.Google Scholar
Krishna, Anirudh. 2002. Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Leelakrishnan, P. 1991. “Law and Sustainable Development in India.” Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law 9: 193206.Google Scholar
Madras City Police Act (1888).Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 2007. “Delhi's Belly.” Studies in History 23(1): 131.Google Scholar
Manor, James. 2001. “Center-State Relations.” In The Success of India's Democracy, edited by Kohli, Atul, 78102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mawdsley, Emma. 2004. “India's Middle Classes and the Environment.” Development and Change 35(1): 79103.Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Kamal Nath, 1 SCC 388 (1997).Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Kamal Nath, 6 SCC 213; AIR 2000 SC 1997 (2000).Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Union of India, 4 SCC 463 (1987a).Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Union of India, 4 SCC 463: AIR 1988 SC 1037 (1987b).Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Union of India, 2 SCC 137; AIR 1991 SC 1132 (1991).Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Union of India, 8 SCC 462 (1996).Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Union of India, 3 SCC 715 (1997).Google Scholar
MC Mehta v. Union of India, 9 SCC 149 (1998).Google Scholar
Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 2006. “India's Judiciary: The Promise of Uncertainty.” In The Supreme Court Versus the Constitution: A Challenge to Federalism, edited by Chopra, Pran, 155177. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Menon, Ajit. 2007. “Engaging with the Law on Adivasi Rights.” Economic and Political Weekly 42(24): 2239–42.Google Scholar
MI Builders Private Limited v. Radhey Shyam Sahu and Others, 6 SCC 464; AIR 1999 SC 2468 (1999).Google Scholar
Muncipal Corporation of Delhi v. Purshottam Das Jhunjhunwala, 1 SCC 9; 1983 SCC (Cri) 123 (1983).Google Scholar
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Ram Krishna Rohtagi, 1 SC 1; 1983 SCC (Cri) 115 (1983).Google Scholar
Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India, 10 SCC 664 (2000).Google Scholar
New Delhi Municipal Committee Act (1994).Google Scholar
Noorani, A.G. 1984. “Public Interest Litigation.” Economic and Political Weekly 19(36): 15681569.Google Scholar
Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, 3 SCC, 545, 573 (1985).Google Scholar
Pathak, Akhileshwar. 1994. “State, Environment, and Law.” Economic and Political Weekly 29(50): 31383141.Google Scholar
Pathak, Akhileshwar. 2002. Law, Strategies, Ideologies: Legislating Forests in Colonial India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Picolotti, Romina and Tallant, Jorge Daniel. 2003. Linking Human Rights and the Environment. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy's Value, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Hackr-Cordon, Casiano, 2355. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rajamani, Lavanya. 2007. “Public Interest Environmental Litigation in India: Exploring Issues of Access, Participation, Equity, Effectiveness and Sustainability.” Journal of Environmental Law 19(3): 293321.Google Scholar
Rajan, Rajeshwari Sunder. 2003. The Scandal of the State: Women, Law and Citizenship in Postcolonial India. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, Usha. 1996. “Displacement and the Law.” Economic and Political Weekly 31(24): 14861491.Google Scholar
Ramanathan, Usha. 2004. “Communities at Risk: Industrial Risk in Indian Law.” Economic and Political Weekly 39(41): 45214527.Google Scholar
Ramsharan Antyanaprasi v. Union of India, Supp (1) SCC 251; AIR 1989 SC 549 (1989).Google Scholar
Rangarajan, Mahesh et al. 2010. Gajah: Securing the Future for Elephants in India. The Report of the Elephant Task Force, Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forests, 31 August.Google Scholar
Rao, Shiva. 2004. The Framing of India's Constitution: Select Documents. Delhi: Universal Law Publishing Company.Google Scholar
RLEK v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 3 SCC 347; AIR 1991 SC 2216 (1991).Google Scholar
RLEL v. State of Uttar Pradesh, Supp SCC 517, 523, 524 (1986).Google Scholar
Rosencranz, Armin and Lele, Sharadchandra. 2008. “Supreme Courts and India's Forests.” Economic and Political Weekly February 2: 1114.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968 [1762]. The Social Contract. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sathe, S.P. 2001. Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkar, Sumit. 2001. “Indian Democracy: The Historical Inheritance.” In The Success of India's Democracy, edited by Kohli, Atul, 2346. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schall, Christian. 2008. “Public Interest Litigation Concerning Environmental Matters Before Human Rights Courts: A Promising Future Concept?Journal of Environmental Law 20(3): 417453.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2004. “Constitutional Ethnography: An Introduction.” Law & Society Review 38(3): 389406.Google Scholar
Shankar, Shylashri and Mehta, Pratap. 2008. “Courts and Socioeconomic Rights in India.” In Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World, edited by Gauri, V. and Brinks, D., 146182. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shanti Star Builders v. Narayan Khimalal Totama, 1 SCC 520, 527, AIR 1990 SC 630 (1990).Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano. 1999. “Promises and Disappointments” “Reconsidering Democracy's Value.” In Democracy's Value, edited by Shapiro, Ian and Hacker-Cordon, Casiano, 119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sharan, Awadhendhra. 2006. “In the city, out of place: environment and modernity, Delhi 1860s to 1960s.” Economic and Political Weekly 41(47): 49054911.Google Scholar
Sheela Barsa v. Union of India, 4 SCC 226, 233, 234; AIR 1988 SC 2211 (1988).Google Scholar
SP Gupta and others v. Union of India, AIR 1982 SC 149 (1982).Google Scholar
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Parent of Student in Medical College, 3 SCC, 169, 175, 176; AIR 1985 SC 910 (1985).Google Scholar
Sub-committee on Judicial Accountability, Union of India, 4 SCC 699 (1991).Google Scholar
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, 1 SCC 598, 604; AIR 1991 SC 420 (1991).Google Scholar
Subramanian, Narendra. 2010. “Normative Vision, Cultural Accommodation and Muslim Law Reform in India.” In The State in India After Liberalization: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Gupta, Akhil and Sivaramakrishnan, K., 155174. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sudarshan, R. 2002 “‘Stateness’ and Democracy in India's Constitution.” In India's Living Constitution: Ideas, Practices, Controversies, edited by Hasan, Zoya, Sridharan, E., and Sudarshan, R., 159178. New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar
Sundar, Nandini. 2010a. Legal Grounds: Natural Resources, Identity, and the Law of Jharkhand. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sundar, Nandini. 2010b. “The Rule of Law and the Rule of Property: Law-Struggles and the Neo-Liberal State.” In The State in India After Liberalization: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Gupta, Akhil and Sivaramakrishnan, K., 175193. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tamil Nadu Towns Nuisances Act (1889).Google Scholar
T. Damodar Rao v. The Special Officer, Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad, AIR 1987AP 171, 181 (1987).Google Scholar
Thapar, Valmik. 2005. “Note of Dissent to the Draft Report of the Task Force for Reviewing the Management of Tiger Reserves” 27 July.Google Scholar
Thayyil, Naveen. 2009. “Judicial Fiats and Contemporary Enclosures.” Conservation and Society 7 (4): 268–82.Google Scholar
Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board v. Mohan Meakin Limited, 3 SCC 745; AIR 2000 SC 1456; 2000 Cri LJ 1799 (2000).Google Scholar
Vedvan, Neeraj. 2007. “Pesticides in Coca Cola and Pepsi: Consumerism, Brand Image, and Public Interest in a Globalizing India.” Cultural Anthropology 22(4): 659684.Google Scholar
Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India, 5 SCC 647 (1996).Google Scholar
Vikram Dev Singh Tomar v. the State of Bihar, Supp SCC 734; AIR 1988 SC 1782 (1988).Google Scholar
Virender Gaur v. State of Haryana, 2 SCC 577 (1995).Google Scholar
Weiss, Edith Brown. 1984. “Planetary Trust: Conservation and Intergenerational Equity.” Ecological Law Quarterly 11(495): 540563.Google Scholar
Wood, Mary Christina. 2009. “Advancing the Sovereign Trust of Government to Safeguard the Environment for Present and Future Generations (Part 1): Ecological Realism and the Need for a Paradigm Shift.” Environmental Law 39: 4390.Google Scholar