Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Mapping a Colonial Borderland: Objectifying the Geo-Body of India's Northeast


India's Northeast frontier is at the margins of three study areas: South Asia, Southeast Asia, and East Asia. This paper attempts a history of “mapping” in its broader sense as a cultural universal over a relatively long period. It is not a history of cartography, but focuses on the interface between cartography and cosmography, which were, in turn, shaped by imperial power and geographical knowledge. This approach offers a high-altitude view of this Asian borderland as the imperial frontier of both the Mughals and the British, and the national fringe of Republican India. The authors argue that imperial geographical discourses invested the colonial Northeast (British Assam) with a new kind of territorial identity. Surveyors and mapmakers objectified the “geo-body” of this borderland in a spatial fix and visualized it as a Northeast-on-the-map. Cartographic territoriality naturalized traditional frontiers into colonial borderlands, which, in turn, forged national boundaries.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Jeremy Adelman , and Stephen Aron . 1999. “From Borderlands to Borders: Empires, Nation-States, and the Peoples in between in North American History.” American Historical Review 104 (3): 814–41.

Arjun Appadurai . 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy.” Public Culture 2 (2): 123.

James M. Blaut , David Stea , Christopher Spencer , and Mark Blades . 2003. “Mapping as a Cultural and Cognitive Universal.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93 (1): 165–85.

C. E. A. W. O.1927. “A History of Assam (Book Review).” Geographical Journal 69 (3): 271–72.

Richard Dennis . 1991. “History, Geography, and Historical Geography.” Social Science History 15 (2): 265–88.

J. B. Harley 1989. “Historical Geography and the Cartographic Illusion.” Journal of Historical Geography 15 (1): 8091.

Richard Helgerson . 1986. “The Land Speaks: Cartography, Chorography, and Subversion in Renaissance England.” Representations 16:5185.

M. Satish Kumar . 2006. “The Census and Women's Work in Rangoon, 1872–1931.” Journal of Historical Geography 32 (2): 377–97.

David N. Livingstone 1994. The Geographical Tradition: Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise. Oxford: Blackwell.

Erik De Maaker , and Vibha Joshi . 2007. “Introduction: The Northeast and Beyond: Region and Culture.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, n.s., 30 (3): 381–90.

Sanghamitra Misra . 2005. “Changing Frontier and Spaces: The Colonial State in Nineteenth-Century Goalpara.” Studies in History, n.s., 21 (2): 215–46.

Ralph J. Retzlaff 1963. “India: A Year of Stability and Change—Survey of India in 1962.” Asian Survey 3 (2): 96106.

Yasmin Saikia . 2004. Fragments of Memories: Struggling to be Tai-Ahom in India. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.

Jai Pal Singh , and Mumtaz Khan . 1999. “Hindu Cosmology and the Orientation and Segregation of Social Groups in Villages in Northwestern India.” Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography 81 (1): 1939.

H. Arthur Steiner . 1959. “India Looks to Her Northern Frontiers.” Far Eastern Survey 28 (11): 167–73.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 0021-9118
  • EISSN: 1752-0401
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 70 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 242 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.