Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Adaptive Developmental State in East Asia

Abstract

In 1997, several of Asia's economies collapsed and the international community was called in to help mend the ailing region. The crisis attracted a great deal of attention among both the scholarly and policy communities. At that time, it seemed that the Asian miracle had come to an abrupt end. Places such as South Korea enjoyed a prosperous run though suffered a dubious demise. Later developers in Southeast Asia and China, having just emerged from out of the starting gate, quickly stalled in their attempts to ride the wave of Asia's postwar economic dynamism. Fortunately, things would not remain dour for too long. Some countries, such as Taiwan and Japan, made it through the crisis relatively unscathed. Both China and South Korea quickly rebounded. Southeast Asian countries, such as Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand, adapted and have consequently begun new growth trajectories. In the end, it seemed that the most severe and lasting casualty of the 1997 crisis was the East Asian developmental state model itself. To be sure, the more recent literatures on East Asian political economy have taken a sharp turn, wherein terms like “booty capitalism” and “crony capitalism” have quickly come to replace more laudatory titles such as the “East Asian Miracle.”

Copyright
References
Hide All

Notes

Thanks to Edward Friedman, Byung-Kook Kim, Louis Pauly, Ito Peng, Richard Sandbrook, and Victor Shih, along with the anonymous reviewer, for their very constructive comments on earlier drafts of this article.

1. Haggard Stephan, The Political Economy of the Asian Financial Crisis (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 2000); Pempel T. J., ed., The Politics of the Asian Financial Crisis (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999).

2. Chin Ko-Lin, Heijin: Organized Crime, Business, and Politics in Taiwan (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 2003); Kang David, Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2002); Hutchcroft Paul, Booty Capitalism: The Politics of Banking in the Philippines (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998); World Bank, The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).

3. Skocpol Theda, “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research.” In Evans Peter, Rueschemeyer Dietrich, and Skocpol Theda, eds., Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1985).

4. Toynbee Arnold, The Industrial Revolution ([1884] rpt., Boston: Beacon Press, 1964); List Friedrich, National System of Political Economy, Book II, The Theory ([1885] rpt., Roseville, Calif.: Dry Bones Press, 1999); Gerschenkron Alexander, Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1962).

5. Bensel Richard Franklin, The Political Economy of American Industrialization 1877–1900 (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

6. Cardosa Fernando Henrique and Faletto Enzo, Dependency and Development in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).

7. Johnson Chalmers, “The Developmental State: Odyssey of a Concept.” In Woo-Cumings Meredith, ed., The Developmental State (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999).

8. Samuels Richard, The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987); Dore Ronald, Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy, 1970–1980 (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1986); Johnson Chalmers, MITI and the Japanese Miracle (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1982).

9. Noble Gregory, Collective Action in East Asia: How Ruling Parties Shape Industrial Policy (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1998); Woo Jung-En, Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991); Wade Robert, Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990); Amsden Alice, Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1989); Deyo Frederic, ed., The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987).

10. Woo-Cumings Meredith, ed., The Developmental State (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999); Evans Peter, Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995); Wu Yu-Shan, Comparative Economic Transformations: Mainland China, Hungary, the Soviet Union and Taiwan (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1994); Haggard Stephan, Pathways from the Periphery: the Politics of Growth in Newly Industrializing Countries (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990); Gereffi Gary and Wyman Donald, eds., Manufacturing Miracles: Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1990).

11. Amsden , Asia's Next Giant.

12. Ibid.

13. Johnson , “Odyssey,” p. 48.

14. Wade , Governing the Market.

15. Goodman Roger, White Gordon, and Kwon Huck-Ju, eds., The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State (London: Routledge Press, 1998).

16. Holliday Ian, “Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia,” Political Studies 48 (2000).

17. Haggard Stephan, “Institutions and Growth in East Asia,” Studies in Comparative International Development 38 (2004).

18. Evans Peter and Rauch James, “Bureaucratic Structure and Bureaucratic Performance in Less Developed Countries,” Journal of Public Economics 75 (January 2000).

19. Cheng Tun-Jen, “Political Regimes and Development Strategies: South Korea and Taiwan.” In Gereffi and Wyman , eds., Manufacturing Miracles.

20. Evans , Embedded Autonomy.

21. Wade , Governing the Market.

22. Wade , Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization , 2nd ed. (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003), preface.

23. Evans Peter, “State Structure, Government-Business Relations, and Economic Transformation.” In Maxfield Sylvia and Schneider Ben Ross, eds., Business and the State in Developing Countries (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997).

24. Campbell John and Ikegami Naoki, The Art of Balance in Health Policy: Maintaining Japan's Low Cost, Egalitarian System (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 111.

25. Prescott Nicholas, ed., Choices in Financing Health Care and Old Age Security (World Bank Discussion Paper No. 392, 1998), p. 8.

26. Diamond Larry and Plattner Marc, eds., Democracy in East Asia (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998; Morley James, ed., Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region, Revised Edition (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 1999).

27. Evans Peter, “State-Structure,” p. 84.

28. Wong Joseph, Healthy Democracies: Welfare Politics in Taiwan and South Korea (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, forthcoming 2004), chap. 8.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of East Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 1598-2408
  • EISSN: 2234-6643
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-east-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 75 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1083 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.