Skip to main content
×
×
Home

ANALYZING COALITIONS IN CHINA'S POLICY FORMULATION: REFORMING THE ROLE OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN CHINA'S ENERGY SECTOR

  • Brian Efird, Leo Lester and Ben Wise
  • Please note a correction has been issued for this article.
Abstract

We focus on the elite decision-making process in China, analyzing the formation of coalitions around particular policy options. We apply a framework that simulates collective decision-making processes (CDMP): the KAPSARC Toolkit for Behavioral Analysis (KTAB). KTAB facilitates the application of a Spatial Model of Politics, an open source model similar to Bueno de Mesquita's (1997) Expected Utility Model and the Senturion model (Abdollahian, et al 2006). KTAB provides a framework to understand logical consequences of subjective data inputs, enabling contrasting scenarios to be analyzed. We examine the interactions of actors' interests that drive China to reform its energy sector policies, in particular the structure of the Chinese National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). In the case of private companies' entry into energy markets in China, we find that little reform is likely. The inertia of key actors holds back the potential for a significant opening of the energy sector. Despite the erosion of CNPC's political clout, there is little consensus for major reform to China's market position.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      ANALYZING COALITIONS IN CHINA'S POLICY FORMULATION: REFORMING THE ROLE OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN CHINA'S ENERGY SECTOR
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      ANALYZING COALITIONS IN CHINA'S POLICY FORMULATION: REFORMING THE ROLE OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN CHINA'S ENERGY SECTOR
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      ANALYZING COALITIONS IN CHINA'S POLICY FORMULATION: REFORMING THE ROLE OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES IN CHINA'S ENERGY SECTOR
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Abdollahian, Mark, Baranick, Michael, Efird, Brian, and Kugler, Jacek. 2006. “Senturion: A Predictive Political Simulation Model.” Defense Technology Paper DTP-032.
Bennett, D. Scott, and Stam, Allan. 2000. “A Universal Test of an Expected Utility Theory of War.” International Studies Quarterly 44: 451480.
Black, Duncan. 1948. “On the Rationale of Group Decision-making.” The Journal of Political Economy 56 (1): 2334.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1981. The War Trap. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1985. “The War Trap Revisited: A Revised Expected Utility Model,” The American Political Science Review 79 (1): 156177.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce. 1997. “A Decision Making Model: It's Structure and Form.” International Interactions 23 (3–4): 235266.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, Newman, David, and Rabushka, Alvin (editors). 1996. Red Flag Over Hong Kong. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Epley, Nicholas, and Gilovich, Thomas. 2006. “The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic: Why the Adjustments Are Insufficient,” Psychological Science, 17 (4): 311318.
Jesse, Eric. 2011. Forecasting the Future of Iran. Ph.D. Thesis, Pardee Rand Graduate School. http://www.rand.org/pubs/rgs_dissertations/RGSD290.html (accessed December 20, 2015).
Newman, David, Rabushka, Alvin, and de Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1985. Forecasting Political Events: The Future of Hong Kong. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ordershook, Peter C. 1997. “The Spatial Analysis of Elections and Committees: Four Decades of Research.” In Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook, ed. Mueller, Dennis C., 247270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scholz, Jason B., Calbert, Gregory J., and Smith, Glen A.. 2011. “Unravelling Bueno de Mesquita's Group Decision Model.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 23 (4): 510531.
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases,” Science. 185 (4157): 11241131.
Wise, Ben. 2010. “Utility, Voting and Strategy in General Issue Spaces.” RAND Corporation, (Unpublished Draft).
Wise, Ben, Lester, Leo, and Efird, Brian. 2015a. “An Introduction to the KAPSARC Toolkit for Behavioral Analysis (KTAB) Using One-Dimensional Spatial Models.” KAPSARC Discussion Paper, April, KS-1517-DP011A.
Wise, Ben, Lester, Leo, and Efird, Brian. 2015b. “Multidimensional Bargaining Using KTAB.” KAPSARC Discussion Paper, November, KS-1524-DP018A.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of East Asian Studies
  • ISSN: 1598-2408
  • EISSN: 2234-6643
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-east-asian-studies
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 24
Total number of PDF views: 224 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 442 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.