Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:58:39.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversionary Dragons, or “Talking Tough in Taipei”: Cross-Strait Relations in the New Millennium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Yitan Li ,
Patrick James  and
A. Cooper Drury
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Much has been written on the triangular, and increasingly high-profile, China-Taiwan-US relations. However, scholars have yet to apply Diversionary Theory to the China-Taiwan dyad. DT argues that leaders may resort to international conflict when domestic political and economic situations become troublesome, aiming at directing public attention away from problems at home. While creation of explicit military conflict in the Taiwan Strait by Taipei is deemed quite unlikely, more subtle processes of diversion might be expected instead. This article applies a variant on DT to assess whether leaders in Taipei have used rhetoric about Taiwan independence or unification as a distraction from domestic problems during the years leading up to Taiwan's 2004 presidential election. We find that, as the president's approval sinks, pro-independence rhetoric becomes more likely. Overall, the results of this study confirm extension of DT to the case of Taiwan and encourage further research applied to middle powers.

Keywords

diversionary theorycross-strait relationsChinaTaiwaninternational conflictChinese politicsEast Asian politics
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , December 2009 , pp. 369 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Brody, Richard A., and Shapiro, Catherine R.. 1989. “A Reconsideration of the Rally Phenomenon in Public Opinion.” In Political Behavior Annual , ed. Long, Samuel. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Ted Galen. 2005. America's Coming War with China: A Collision Course over Japan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chambers, Michael R. 2002. “Rising China: A Threat to Its Neighbors?” In The Rise of China in Asia: Security Implications , ed. Pumphrey, Carolyn W.. Carlisle Barracks, PA: Storming Media.Google Scholar
Chan, Steve. 2003. “Extended Deterrence in the Taiwan Strait: Learning from Rationalist Explanations in International Relations.” World Affairs 166, 2: 109–125.Google Scholar
Ching-kuo, Chiang. 1979. The Republic of China Is on the Move. Hong Kong: Kwang Hwa Publishing.Google Scholar
Copper, John F. 1990. Nation-State or Province? Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
DeRouen, Karl Jr. 2000. “Presidents and the Diversionary Use of Force: A Research Note.” International Studies Quarterly 44: 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, George C., and Gallup, Alec M.. 1990. Presidential Approval: A Sourcebook. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 1998a. “Partisanship, Macroeconomic Policy, and U.S. Uses of Force, 1949–1994.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 42: 418–439.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 1998b. “The Politics of Threat Perception and the Use of Force: A Political Economy Model of U.S. Uses of Force, 1949–1994.” International Studies Quarterly 42: 567–590.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 2005. “Strategic Conflict Avoidance and the Diversionary Use of Force.” Journal of Politics 67: 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, Jean A. 2005. Making China Policy: From Nixon to G. W. Bush. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Hickey, Dennis V. 2001. The Armies of East Asia: China, Taiwan, Japan, and the Koreas. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, Dennis V. 2007. Foreign Policy Making in Taiwan: From Principle to Pragmatism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hickey, Dennis V., and Li, Yitan. 2002. “Cross-Strait Relations in the Aftermath of the Election of Chen Shui-bian.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 28: 201–216.Google Scholar
James, Patrick. 1988. Crisis and War. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
James, Patrick, and Oneal, John R.. 1991. “The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 35: 307–332.Google Scholar
James, Patrick, and Rioux, Jean-Sébastien. 1998. “International Crises and Linkage Politics: The Experiences of the United States, 1953–1994.” Political Research Quarterly 51: 781–812.Google Scholar
James, Patrick, and Zhang, Enyu. 2005. “Chinese Choices: A Poliheuristic Analysis of Foreign Policy Crises, 1950–1996.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1:31–54.Google Scholar
Kang, David. 2007. China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Peter. 1998. A Guide to Econometrics. 4th ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kisangani, Emizet F., and Pickering, Jeffrey. 2007. “Diverting with Benevolent Military Force: Reducing Risks and Rising Above Strategic Behavior.” International Studies Quarterly 51: 277–299.Google Scholar
Kmenta, Jan. 1986. Elements of Econometrics. 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lai, Brian, and Reiter, Dan. 2005. “Rally 'Round the Union Jack? Public Opinion and the Use of Force in the United Kingdom, 1948–2001.” International Studies Quarterly 49: 255–272.Google Scholar
Lamborn, Alan C. 1991. The Price of Power: Risk and Foreign Policy in Britain, France, and Germany. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S. 1989. “The Diversionary Theory of War: A Critique.” In Handbook of War Studies , ed. Midlarsky, Manus I.. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Levy, Jack S., and Mabe, William F. Jr. 2004. “Politically Motivated Opposition to War.” International Studies Review 6: 65–83.Google Scholar
Lynch, Daniel C. 2006. Rising China and Asian Democratization: Socialization to “Global Culture” in the Political Transformations of Thailand, China, and Taiwan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mastanduno, Michael, Lake, David A., and John Ikenberry, G.. 1989. “Toward a Realist Theory of State Action.” International Studies Quarterly 33: 457–474.Google Scholar
McClelland, Charles. 1999. World Event/Interaction Survey, 1966–1978. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.Google Scholar
Meernik, James. 2000. “Modeling International Crises and the Political Use of Force by the USA.” Journal of Peace Research 37: 547–562.Google Scholar
Miller, Ross A. 1995. “Domestic Structures and the Diversionary Use of Force.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 760–785.Google Scholar
Morgan, , Clifton, T., and Anderson, Christopher J.. 1999. “Domestic Support and Diversionary External Conflict in Great Britain, 1950–1992.” Journal of Politics 61: 799–814.Google Scholar
Morgan, , Clifton, T., and Bickers, Kenneth. 1992. “Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, John E. 1973. War, Presidents, and Public Opinion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Narine, Shaun. 2008. “From Conflict to Collaboration: Institution-Building in East Asia.” Behind the Headlines 65, 3: 1–22.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W., and Job, Brian. 1986. “The President and the Political Use of Force.” American Political Science Review 80: 541–566.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Charles W., and Simon, Dennis. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review 79: 334–338.Google Scholar
Pickering, Jeffrey, and Kisangani, Emizet F.. 2005. “Democracy and Diversionary Military Intervention: Reassessing Regime Type and the Diversionary Hypothesis.” International Studies Quarterly 49: 23–43.Google Scholar
Pindyck, Robert S., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. 1981. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42: 427–460.Google Scholar
Redd, Steven B. 2005. “The Influence of Advisers and Decision Strategies on Foreign Policy Choices: President Clinton's Decision to Use Force in Kosovo.” International Studies Perspectives 6: 129–150.Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1969. Linkage Politics: Essays on the Convergence of National and International Systems. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Robert S. 2006. “Taiwan's Fading Independence Movement.” Foreign Affairs 85: 141–148.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce M. 1990. “Economic Decline, Electoral Pressure, and the Initiation of Interstate Conflict.” In Prisoners of War? National-States in the Modern Era , ed. Gochman, Charles S. and Sabrosky, Alan Ned. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Senese, Paul D. 2005. “Chinese Acquisition of the Spratly Archipelago and Its Implications for the Future.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 22: 79–94.Google Scholar
Sprecher, Christopher, and DeRouen, Karl Jr. 2002. “Israeli Military Action and Internationalization-Externalization Processes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46: 149–164.Google Scholar
Sprecher, Christopher, and DeRouen, Karl Jr. 2005. “The Domestic Determinants of Foreign Policy Behavior in Middle Eastern Enduring Rivals, 1948–1998.” Foreign Policy Analysis 1: 121–141.Google Scholar
Wu, Hsin-hsing. 1994. Bridging the Strait: Taiwan, China, and the Prospects for Reunification. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Baohui. 2008. “Taiwan's Political Balancing Act.” Global Asia 3, 2: 82–89.Google Scholar