Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 August 2016
The rollout of Rural Free Delivery (RFD) in the early twentieth centurydramatically increased the frequency with which rural voters receivedinformation. This article examines the effect of RFD on voters' andRepresentatives' behavior using a panel dataset and instrumentalvariables. Communities receiving more routes spread their votes to more parties;there is no evidence it changed turnout. RFD shifted positions taken byRepresentatives in line with rural constituents, including increased support forpro-temperance and anti-immigration policies. These results appear only incounties with newspapers, supporting the hypothesis that information flows playa crucial role in the political process.
“As the whole world has been drawn closer together by theinventions and uses of steam and electricity, so farmers may bedrawn closer together by the universal practice of freedelivery.”
—Matthew Williams of Verndale, Minnesota as quoted in the 1900Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture
We are extremely grateful to Laurent Bouton, Bob Margo, Carola Frydman,Daniele Paserman, Florian Ploeckl, Richard Baker, Claudio Ferraz, DebbieGoldschmidt, Nate Young, Briana Sprick Schuster, Peter Sims, MattBerntsen, Ross Corliss, James Feigenbaum, anonymous referees, andnumerous seminar participants for their helpful ideas, advice, andcomments. All errors are our own.