Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-05T18:46:51.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Development of Property Rights on Frontiers: Endowments, Norms, and Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

LEE J. ALSTON ,
EDWYNA HARRIS  and
BERNARDO MUELLER
LEE J. ALSTON*
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, Institute of Behavioral Studies and Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Boulder, 468 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309-0468. E-mail: lee.alston@colorado.edu.
EDWYNA HARRIS*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, Department of Economics, Monash University, Building 11, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia. E-mail: edwyna.harris@monash.edu.
BERNARDO MUELLER*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Economics, Universidade de Brasília, Campus Darcy Ribeiro, ICC Norte, Brasília- D.F., 70910-900. E-mail: bmueller@unb.br.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do property rights evolve when unoccupied areas attract economic use? Who are the first claimants on the frontier and how do they establish their property rights? When do governments provide de jure property rights? We present a conceptual framework that addresses these questions and apply it to the frontiers of Australia, the United States, and Brazil. Our framework stresses the crucial role of politics as frontiers develop by identifying situations where the competition for land by those with de facto rights and those with de jure rights leads to violence or potential conflicts.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , 22 August 2012 , pp. 741 - 770
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A.. “Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91, no. 5 (2001): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Q. “Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steve, 385–472. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.Google Scholar
Adeney, W.Awards and Correspondence. MS 11920. State Library of Victoria, 1845–1847.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J., and Ferrie, J. P.. “Paternalism in Agricultural Labor Contracts in the U.S. South: Implications for the Growth of the Welfare State.” American Economic Review 83, no. 4 (1993): 852–76.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J., Harris, E., and Mueller, B.. “De Facto and De Jure Property Rights: Land Settlement and Land Conflict on the Australian, Brazilian, and U.S. Frontiers.” NBER Working Paper No.15264, Cambridge, MA, August 2009.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A.. “Property Rights, Land Settlement, and Land Conflict on Frontiers: Evidence from Australia, Brazil and the U.S.” In Research Handbook on the Economics of Property Law, edited by Ayotte, Kenneth and Smith, Henry E., 115–40. Oxford: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J., Libecap, G. D., and Mueller, B.. “A Model of Rural Conflict: Violence and Land Reform Policy in Brazil.” Environment and Development Economics 4, no. 2 (1999a): 135–60.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J., Harris, E., and Mueller, B.. Titles, Conflict, and Land Use: The Development of Property Rights and Land Reform on the Brazilian Amazon Frontier. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1999c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, L. J., Libecap, G. D., and Mueller, B.. “Land Reform Policies: The Sources of Violent Conflict, and Implications for Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39, no. 2 (2000): 162–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, T. L., and Hill, P. J.. The Not So Wild, Wild West: Property Rights on the Frontier, Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archives of New South Wales. 4/2680. Colonial Secretary. Main Series of Letters Received 1826-1982.Google Scholar
Archives of New South Wales. 4/3660. Colonial Secretary. Main Series of Letters Received 1826-1982.Google Scholar
Baker, D. W. A. “The Origins of Robertson's Land Acts.” Australian Historical Studies 8 (1958): 166–82.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A., and Iyer, L.. “History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India.” American Economic Review 95, no. 4 (2005): 1190–1213.Google Scholar
Bassanezi, M. S. C. B., Scott, A. S. V., Bacellar, C. A. P., and Truzzi, O. M. S.. Atlas da Imigração Internacional em São Paulo, 1850-1950. São Paulo: Editora UNESP, 2008.Google Scholar
Bate, W.Victorian Gold Rushes. Melbourne: McPhee Gribble/Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Black, N.Station Records. MS 8996. State Library of Victoria, 1830–1923.Google Scholar
Briggs, H. E. “The Development and Decline of Open Range Ranching in the Northwest.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 20 (1934): 521–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, P.Britain and Australia, 1831-1855: A Study in Imperial Relations and Crown Lands Administration. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Butlin, N. G. “Close Encounters of the Worst Kind: Modeling Aboriginal Depopulation and Resource Competition, 1788-1850.” Working Papers in Economic History, Number 8, Australian National University, 1982.Google Scholar
Alston, L. J., Harris, E., and Mueller, B.. “Prices.” In Australians Historical Statistics, edited by Vamplew, Wray, 126–82. Melbourne: Fairfax, Syme, and Weldon, 1987.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. Murilo de. Teatro de Sombras: A Política Imperial. São Paulo: Edições Vértice e IUPERJ, 1988.Google Scholar
Coatsworth, J. “Structures, Endowments, and Institutions in the Economic History of Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 40, no. 3 (2005): 126–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CPT. Conflitos no Campo Brasil 2010. Goiania: Comissão Pastoral da Terra, 2011.Google Scholar
Crawford, S. E. S., and Ostrom, E.. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 89, no. 3 (1995): 582–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curr, E. M.Recollections of Squatting in Victoria, then called the Port Phillip District (from 1841 to 1851), 2nd edition. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Dale, E. E.The Range Cattle Industry: Ranching on the Great Plains from 1865 to 1925. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Dean, W. “Latifundia and Land Policy in Nineteenth-Century Brazil.” Hispanic-American History Review vol. 51, no. 4 (1971): 606–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, M. “The Persistent Effects of Peru's Mining Mita.” Econometrica 78, no. 6 (2010): 1863–1903.Google Scholar
Demsetz, H. “Towards a Theory of Property Rights.” American Economic Review 57, no. 2 (1967): 347–59.Google Scholar
Dennen, R. T. “Cattlemen's Associations and Property Rights in the American West.” Explorations in Economic History 13 (1976): 423–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingle, A.The Victorians Settling. Melbourne: Fairfax, Syme, and Weldon Associates, 1984.Google Scholar
Dye, A., and La Croix, S. J.. “The Political Economy of Land Privatization in Argentina and Australia, 1810-1856.” Manuscript, 2010.Google Scholar
Easterly, W., and Levine, R.. “Tropics, Germs, and Crops: How Endowments Influence Economic Development.” Journal of Monetary Economics 50, no. 1 (2003): 3–39.Google Scholar
Engerman, S. L., and Sokoloff, K. L.. “Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies: A View from Economic Historians of the United States.” In How Latin America Fell Behind, edited by Haber, Stephen, 260-306. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Engerman, S. L., and Sokoloff, K. L.. “Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development Among New World Economies.” NBER Working Paper No. 9529, Cambridge, MA, September 2002.Google Scholar
Feyrer, J., and Sacerdote, B.. “Colonialism and Modern Income: Islands as Natural Experiments” Review of Economics and Statistics 91, no. 2 (2009): 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M.The Origins of Mass Immigration to Brazil, 1871-1914. Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1969.Google Scholar
Halloway, T. H.Immigrantes para o Café. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1984.Google Scholar
Imlah, A. H. “The Terms of Trade of the United Kingdom, 1798-1913.” The Journal of Economic History 10, no. 2 (1950): 170–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INCRA. “Projetos de Reforma Ágrária Conforme Fases de Implementação.” Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Colonização e Reforma Agrária, 2012.Google Scholar
Iyer, L. “Direct versus Indirect Colonial Rule in India: Long-Term Consequences.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92, no. 4 (2010): 693–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, A., and Dussart, F.. “Trajectories of Protection: Protectorates of Aborigines in Early Nineteenth Century Australia and Aotearoa, New Zealand.” New Zealand Geographer 64 (2008): 205–20.Google Scholar
Libecap, G. D., and Hansen, Z. K.. “Small Farms, Externalities, and the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.” Journal of Political Economy 112, no. 3 (2004): 665–94.Google Scholar
Millis, R.Waterloo Creek: The Australia Day Massacre of 1838, George Gipps and the British Conquest of New South Wales. Sydney: McPhee and Gribble, 1992.Google Scholar
Morris, A., and Ranken, G.. Report of Inquiry into the State of Public Lands and the Operation of the Land Laws. New South Wales Legislative Assembly, Votes and Proceedings. Sydney: Government Printer, 1883.Google Scholar
Nicolau, Jairo.. História do Voto no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Zahar, 2002.Google Scholar
Nimmo, J.Report on the Internal Commerce of the United States. House Executive Document 7, Part 3, Serial 2295, 48th Congress, Second Session, 1884-1885.Google Scholar
North, D., Summerhill, W., and Weingast, B.. “Order, Disorder, and Economic Change: Latin America vs. North America.” In Governing for Prosperity, edited by de Mesquita, Bueno and Root, Hilton L., 17–58. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Nugent, J., and Robinson, J. A.. “Are Endowments Fate?” Unpublished Paper, Harvard University, 2005.Google Scholar
Osgood, E. S.The Day of the Cattleman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Osório, S. L.Terras Devolutas e Latifúndio: Efeitos da Lei de 1850. Campinas: Editora Unicamp, 1996.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E.Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelzer, L.The Cattlemen's Frontier. Glendale, CA: Arthur H. Clark Co., 1936.Google Scholar
Port Phillip Association. Papers of the Port Phillip Association. MS 10258, State Library of Victoria, 1835-1836.Google Scholar
Powell, J. W. “Report on the Lands of the Arid Region of the United States.” 45 Congress, 2nd Session, Executive Document, No. 73. Washington, DC: GPO, 1878.Google Scholar
Reece, R.Aborigines and Colonists: Aborigines and Colonial Society in New South Wales in the 1830s and 1840s. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Rivera, P. A., Nugent, J. B., and Saddi, V.. “Abolition and the Evolution of Property Rights in Land: The Role of Immigrant Labor and Its Recruitment in Brazil.” Working Paper, California State University, Channel Islands, 2004.Google Scholar
Robbins, R. M.Our Landed Heritage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. H.History of Australian Land Settlement. Melbourne: Macmillan Press, 1924Google Scholar
Roberts, S. H.The Squatting Age in Australia, 1835-1847. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1935.Google Scholar
Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., and Trebbi, F.. “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Growth 9, no. 9 (2004): 131–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandoz, Mari.. The Cattlemen. New York: Hastings House, 1958.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. G. L. “British Policy Toward the Australian Aborigines, 1830-1850.” Australian Historical Studies 25 (1992): 265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, A. G. L.A History of the Port Phillip District: Victoria Before Separation. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Terrell, J. U.Land Grab: The Truth about the Winning of the West. New York: The Dial Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Weaver, J. C. “Beyond the Fatal Shore: Pastoral Squatting and the Occupation of Australia 1826 to 1852.” American Historical Review 101, no. 4 (1996): 981–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. “History without Evidence: Latin American Inequality Since 1491.” NBER Working Paper No. 14766, Cambridge, MA, March 2009.Google Scholar