Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-06T13:46:34.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Institutional Development and Colonial Heritage within Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2012

JOANA NARITOMI*
Affiliation:
Ph.D. Candidate in Political Economy and Government, Department of Economics, Harvard University, Littauer Center, 1805 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138. E-mail: naritomi@fas.harvard.edu.
RODRIGO R. SOARES*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Economics, Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22451-900, Brazil. E-mail: soares@econ.puc-rio.br.
JULIANO J. ASSUNÇÃO*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro, Department of Economics, Rua Marquês de São Vicente 225, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22451-900, Brazil. E-mail: juliano@econ.puc-rio.br.

Abstract

This article analyzes the determinants of local institutions in Brazil. We show that institutional quality and distribution of land are partly inherited from the colonial histories experienced by different areas of the country. The sugar cane boom—characterized by an oligarchic society—is associated with more land inequality. The gold boom—characterized by a heavily inefficient presence of the Portuguese state—is associated with worse governance and access to justice. We do not find similar effects for a postcolonial boom (coffee). We also find that the colonial episodes are correlated with lower provision of public goods.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James A.. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91, no. 5 (2001): 13691401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. “De Facto Political Power and Political Persistence.” American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 96, no. 2 (2006): 325–30.Google Scholar
Boxer, Charles R.A Idade do Ouro do Brasil – Dores do Crescimento de uma Sociedade Colonial. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira, 2000.Google Scholar
Costa, Iraci del Nero da. “Fundamentos Econômicos da Ocupação e Povoamento de Minas Gerais.” Revista do IEB 24 (1982): 4152.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley L., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L.. “The Factor Endowments, Institutions, and Differential Paths of Growth Among New World Economies.” In How Latin America Fell Behind, edited by Haber, Stephen, 260–96. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausto, Boris. História do Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Universidade de São Paulo, 2006.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, Luciano Raposo de Almeida. “Derrama e política fiscal ilustrada.” Revista do Arquivo Público Mineiro. Ano XLI, Julho – Dezembro (2005): 2239.Google Scholar
Furtado, Celso. Formação Econômica do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Fundo de Cultura, 1959.Google Scholar
Gallup, John Luke, Sachs, Jeffrey, and Mellinger, Andrew D.. “Geography and Economic Development.” In Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1998/1999, edited by Plsekovic, Boris and Stiglitz, Joseph, 127–78. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1999.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Ellis, Wibbels, Erik, and Mvukiyehe, Eric. “Lessons from Strange Cases— Democracy, Development, and the Resource Curse in the U.S. States.” Comparative Political Studies 41, no. 4-5 (2008): 477514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higman, Barry W.The Sugar Revolution.” Economic History Review 53, no. 2 (2000): 213–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holanda, Sérgio B. de. História Geral da Civilização Brasileira: A Época Colonial. São Paulo: Difusão Européia do Livro, 1968.Google Scholar
IBGE. Pesquisa de Informações Básicas Municipais – Perfil dos Municípios Brasileiros. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, 2001.Google Scholar
Luna, Francisco Vidal, and Klein, Herbert S.. Slavery and the Economy of Sao Paulo, 1750-1850. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milliet, Sergio. Roteiro do Café e outros ensaios. Volume XXV. São Paulo: Colecao Departamento de Cultura, 1937.Google Scholar
North, Douglas. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5, no. 1 (1991): 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunn, Nathan. “The Importance of History for Economic Development.” Annual Review of Economics 1, no. 1 (2009): 6592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, Rohini, and Udry, Christopher. “Institutions and Development: A View from Below.” Unpublished Manuscript, Yale University, 2006.Google Scholar
Prado, Caio Jr.. História Econômia do Brasil. São Paulo: Brasilianse, 1945.Google Scholar
Reis, Eustáquio J.Uma Interpretação Econômica da História do Brasil.” Unpublished Manuscript, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, 2005.Google Scholar
Ross, Michael L.The Political Economy of the Resource Curse.” World Politics 51, no. 2 (1999): 297322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russel-Wood, Anthony J. R.Technology and Society: The Impact of Gold Mining and the Institution of Slavery in Portuguese America.” The Journal of Economic History 37, no. 1 (1977): 5983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Stuart B. “Plantations and Peripheries: c.1580-c.1750.” In Colonial Brazil, edited by Bethell, Leslie, 67144.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonsen, Roberto C.História Econômica do Brasil (1500-1820). São Paulo: Editora Nacional, 1937 [1977].Google Scholar
Stein, Stanley J.Vassouras: A Brazilian Coffee County, 1850-1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Taunay, Affonso de E.Historia do Cafe no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Departamento Nacional do Café, 1939.Google Scholar
Wehling, Arno. Formação do Brasil Colonial. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Nova Fronteira, 1994.Google Scholar