Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Check Tax: Fiscal Folly and the Great Monetary Contraction

  • William D. Lastrapes (a1) and Grorge Selgin (a1)

Although its role has been overlooked by monetary historians, a two-cent tax on bank checks effective from June 1932 through December 1934 appears to have been an important contributing factor to that period's severe monetary contraction. According to the estimates in this article, the currency–demand deposit ratio was about 15 percent higher, and the M1 money stock about 12 percent smaller, ceteris paribus, than each would have been without the tax. The contractionary consequences had in fact been anticipated by many legislators who were, nevertheless, unable to prevent the measure from being included in the Revenue Act of 1932.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Michael D. Bordo , Ehsan U. Choudhri , and Anna J. Schwartz . “Could Stable Money have Averted the Great Contraction?Economic Inquiry 33, no. 3 (1995): 484505.

James M. Boughton , and Elmus R. Wicker . “The Behavior of the Currency-Deposit Ratio during the Great Depression”. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking11, no. 4 (1979): 405–18.

Arthur F. Burns The Relative Importance of Check and Cash Payments in the United States, 1919–1928”. Journal of the American Statistical Association 24, no. 12 (1929): 420–24.

Stephen G. Cecchetti , and Georgios Karras . “Sources of Output Fluctuations During the Interwar Period: Further Evidence on the Causes of the Great Depression”. Review of Economics and Statistics 76, no. 1 (1994): 80102.

David Dickey , and Wayne A. Fuller . “Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”. Econometrica 49, no. 4 (1981): 1057–72.

James D. Hamilton Monetary Factors in the Great Depression”. Journal of Monetary Economics 19, no. 2 (1987): 145–70.

Soren Johansen , and Katarina Juselius . “Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration—With Applications to the Demand for Money”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, no. 2 (1990): 169210.

Denis Peter C. B. Phillips Kwiatkowski , Peter Schmidt , and Youngcheol Shin . “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity Against the Alternative of a Unit Root”. Journal of Econometrics 54, no. 1 (1992): 159–78.

Bennett T. McCallum Could a Monetary Base Rule Have Prevented the Great Depression?Journal of Monetary Economics 26, no. 1 (1990): 326.

Pierre Perron . “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 8, no. 2 (1990): 153–62.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 229 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.