Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:24:47.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Learning-by-Producing and the Geographic Links Between Invention and Production: Experience from the Second Industrial Revolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2006

Dhanoos Sutthiphisal
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, McGill University 855, Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2T7, Canada; and Faculty Research Fellow, NBER. E-mail: dhanoos.sutthiphisal@mcgill.ca.

Abstract

This article investigates the impact of “learning-by-producing” on inventive activity. From 1870 to 1910, in both emerging (electrical equipment and supplies) and maturing (shoes and textiles) industries, the geographic association between invention and production was rather weak. Regional shifts in production did not lead to corresponding increases in invention. The location of inventive activity tended to mirror that of individuals with advanced technical skills appropriate to each industry. Consequently, scholars may have overemphasized the importance of learning-by-producing in accounting for geographic differences in inventive activity, and underestimated the significance of technical skills amongst the population.

Type
ARTICLES
Copyright
© 2006 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alchian Armen. (1963): “Reliability of Progress Curves in Airframe Production.” Econometrica 31 67993.Google Scholar
Arora Ashish, Andrea Fosfuri, and Alfonso Gambardella. (2001): “Specialized Technology Suppliers, International Spillovers and Investments: Evidence from the Chemical Industry.” Journal of Development Economics 65, no. 1 3154.Google Scholar
Arrow Kenneth J. (1962): “The Economic Implication of Learning by producing.” Review of Economic Studies 29, no. 3 15573.Google Scholar
Audretsch David B., and Maryann P. Feldman. (1996): “R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production.” American Economic Review 86, no. 3 pp. 63040.Google Scholar
Chandler Alfred D., Jr. The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Copeland Melvin T. (1909): “Technical Development in Cotton Manufacturing since 1860.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 24, no. 1 10959.Google Scholar
Dumais Guy, Glenn Ellison, and Edward Glaeser. (2002): “Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic Process.” Review of Economics and Statistics 114, no. 2 389432.Google Scholar
Feldman Maryann P., and Richard Florida. (1994): “The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84, no. 2 21029.Google Scholar
Gibbs George Sweet. 1950. The Saco-Lowell Shops: Textile Machinery Building in New England, 1813–1949. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Griliches Zvi. (1990): “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey.” Journal of Economic Literature 28, no. 4 1661707.Google Scholar
Hekman John S. (1980): “The Product Cycle and New England Textiles.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 94, no. 4 697717.Google Scholar
Hounshell David A. 1984. From the American System to Mass Production 1800–1932. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hughes Thomas Parke. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. “IEEE History Center,” www.ieee.org, (accessed April 2003–July 2004).
Irwin Doublas A., and Peter J. Klenow. (1994): “Learning-by-Doing Spillovers in the Semiconductor Industry.” Journal of Political Economy 102, no. 6 120027.Google Scholar
Jaffe Adam B., Manuel Trajtenberg, and Rebecca Henderson. (1993): “Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 57798.Google Scholar
Kane Nancy Frances. 1988. Textiles in Transition: Technology, Wages, and Industry Relocation in the U.S. Textile Industry, 1880–1930. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Keller Wolfgang. (2004): “International Technology Diffusion.” Journal of Economic Literature 42 75282.Google Scholar
Khan B. Zorina. 2005. The Democratization of Invention: Patents and Copyrights in American Economic Development, 1790–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kim Sukkoo. (1995): “Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities: The Trends in U.S. Regional Manufacturing Structure, 1860–1897.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, no. 4 881908.Google Scholar
Krugman Paul. 1991. Geography and Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lamoreaux Naomi R. The Great Merger Movement in American Business, 1895–1904. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lamoreaux Naomi R., and Kenneth L. Sokoloff. (2000): “The Geography of Invention in the American Glass Industry, 1870–1925.” This Journal 60, no. 3 70029.Google Scholar
Lexis Nexis. March 2005. “U.S. Patents.” www.lexisnexis.com
Lo Shih-tse. “Strenghtening Intellectual Property rights: Experience from the 1986 Taiwanese Patent Reforms.” Concordia University Working Paper No. 04004, Montreal, Canada, November 2004.
Mann Charles Riborg. 1918. A Study of Engineering Education. Bulletin No. 11, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Boston: The Marymount Press.
Mass William. (1989): “Mechanical and Organizational Innovation: The Drapers and the Automatic Loom.” Business History Review 63, no. 4 876929.Google Scholar
My Family.com Inc. “Ancestry World Tree.” www.ancestry.com, (accessed February 2003–July 2004).
My Family.com Inc. “Biographies of Notable Americans, 1904.” www.ancestry.com (February 2003–July 2004).
My Family.com Inc. “Directories and Member Lists.” www.ancestry.com (accessed February 2003–July 2004).
My Family.com Inc. “U.S. Census Collection.” www.genealogy.com (accessed February 2003–July 2004).
My Family.com Inc. “U.S. Federal Census Images.” www.ancestry.com (accessed February 2003–July 2004).
Myrdal David R. 1957. Economic Theory and Under-Developed Regions. London: Duckworth.
Passer Harold C. 1953. The Electrical Manufacturers, 1875–1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Primary Source Microfilm. “City Directories of the United States.” Microfilm. Thomson-Gale, various years.
Rosenberg Nathan. (1963): “Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910.” This Journal 23, no. 4 41443.Google Scholar
Saxenian AnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmookler Jacob. 1966. Inventions and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmookler Jacob. 1972. Patents, Invention, and Economic Change: Data and Selected Essays. Edited by Zvi Griliches and Leonid Hurwicz. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith Adam. 1937 The Wealth of Nations. New York, NY: Modern Library.
Sokoloff Kenneth L. (1988): “Inventive Activity in Early Industrial America: Evidence from Patent Records, 1790–1846.” This Journal 48, No. 4 81350.Google Scholar
Sutthiphisal Dhanoos. 2004. “The Geography of Invention in High- and Low-Technology Industries: Evidence from the Second Industrial Revolution.” PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles
Temin Peter. 1972. “Manufacturing.” In American Economic Growth, edited by Lance E. Davis, 41867. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “Ancestral File.” www.familysearch.org, (accessed February 2003–July 2004).
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “Census Records.” www.familysearch.org, (accessed February 2003–July 2004).
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. “Pedigree Resource File.” www.familysearch.org, (accessed February 2003–July 2004).
Thomas Publishing Company. 1907. Thomas' Register of American Manufacturers. New York: Thomas Publishing Company.
Thomson Ross. 1989. The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Population, Reported by States. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Manufactures, Reported by States. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Census of Manufactures, Reported by Industries. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.
U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. Measuring America: The Decennial Censuses From 1790 to 2000. Series POL/02-MA. Washington, DC: GPO.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. “Full-Page Images.” www.uspto.gov, (accessed October 2001–July 2004).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. “Patent Classification,” www.uspto.gov (accessed October 2001–July 2004).
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 2001. Technology Assessment and Forecast Report: Patent Counts by Country/State and Year–Utility Patents, January 1, 1963–December 31, 2001. Washington, DC: GPO.
U.S. Patent Office. Annual Reports of the Commissioner of Patents. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.
U.S. Patent Office. Official Gazette of the United States Patent Office. Washington, DC: GPO, various years.
U.S. Technical Committee on Industrial Classification. 1957. Standard Industrial Classification Manual. Revision of the 1945 ed. of manufacturing industries and the 1949 ed. of nonmanufacturing industries. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, Bureau of the Budget.
Weld L. D. H. (1912): “Specialization in the Woolen and Worsted Industry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 27, no. 1 6794.Google Scholar
Wright Gavin. (1981): “Cheap Labor and Southern Textiles, 1880–1930.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 96, no. 4 60529.Google Scholar
Young Alwyn. (1991): “Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, no. 2 369405.Google Scholar
Young Alwyn. (1993): “Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing.” Journal of Political Economy 101, no. 3 44372.Google Scholar