Skip to main content Accessibility help

Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade

  • Michael Huberman (a1), Christopher M. Meissner (a2) and Kim Oosterlinck (a3)


Belle Époque Belgium recorded an unprecedented trade boom. Exploiting a new granular trade dataset, we find that the number of products delivered abroad and destinations serviced more than doubled in less than 40 years. To explain this remarkable achievement, we study the relationship between trade costs and the intensive and extensive margins of trade. The establishment of a foreign diplomatic network that lowered beachhead costs and enabled the entry of new products was an essential fact of the trade boom. Interestingly, the expansion in trade in certain sectors did not translate into faster productivity growth. We offer some explanations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade
      Available formats

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade
      Available formats

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade
      Available formats



Hide All

We benefited from the comments of participants in conferences and seminars at the 2014 meetings of the Economic History Association, Universitat de Barcelona, University of California, Berkeley, University of California, Los Angeles, University of Cambridge, CREST/INSEE/Polytechnique, Université de Genève, Paris School of Economics, Université Paris-Dauphine, Université Paris-Sud, Northwestern University, Queen's University, Universidade de São Paulo, the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, and the University of Southern Denmark, Odense. We also thank Concepción Betrán, Dan Liu, Jose de Sousa, and John Tang for their suggestions, and Walter Steingress for excellent research assistance. The usual disclaimer applies.



Hide All
Albornoz, Facundo, Hector, F. Pardo, Calvo, Corcos, Gregory, et al. “Sequential Exporting.” Journal of International Economics 88, no. 1 (2012): 1731.
Almanach de Gotha. Annuaire généalogique, diplomatique et statistique. Gotha: Perthes, various years.
Anderson, James E.A Theoretical Foundation for the Gravity Equation.” American Economic Review 69, no. 1 (1979): 106–16.
Anderson, James E.European Trade Policy, 1815-1914.” In The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Volume VIII, The Industrial Economies: The Development of Economic and Social Policies, edited by Mathias, Peter and Pollard, Sidney, 1–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Baldwin, Richard E., and Robert-Nicoud, Frédéric. “Trade and Growth with Heterogeneous Firms.” Journal of International Economics 74, no. 1 (2008): 21–34.
Baldwin, Richard E., and Forslid, Rikard. “Trade Liberalization with Heterogeneous Firms.” Review of Development Economics 14, no. 1 (2010): 161–76.
Belgium. Annuaire statistique. Brussels, various years.
Belgium. Recueil consulaire: les rapports commerciaux des agents belges à l'étranger. Brussels, various years.
Belgium. Tableau général du commerce avec les pays étrangers, 1870-1914. Brussels: Ministre des Finances, various years.
Belgium. Industrie du caouthchouc et de l'amiante. Office du Travail et Inspection de l'Industrie. Monographies Industrielles, Group VI. Brussels, 1907.
Belgium. Recensement de l'industrie et du commerce, 1910. Brussels: Office du Travail, 1913.
Bernard, Andrew B., and Bradford Jensen, JExporters, Jobs and Wages in US Manufacturing: 1976-1987.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics 47 (1999): 67–112.
Bernard, Andrew B., Bradford Jensen, J., Redding, Stephen J., et al. “Firms in International Trade.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 2, no. 3 (2007): 105–30.
Bernard, Andrew B., Bradford Jensen, J., Redding, Stephen J., et al. (2009). “The Margins of U.S. Trade (Long Version).” NBER Working Paper No. 14662, Cambridge, MA, 2009.
Besedeš, Tibor, and Prusa, Thomas J.Ins, Outs, and the Duration of Trade.” Canadian Journal of Economics 39, no. 1 (2006): 266295.
Betrán, Concepción, and Huberman, Michael. “International Competition in the First Wave of Globalization: New Evidence on the Margins of Trade.” Economic History Review 69, no. 1 (2016): 258–87.
Boschma, Ron A.The Rise of Clusters of Innovative Industries in Belgium During the Industrial Epoch.” Research Policy 28, no. 5 (1999): 853–71.
Brion, René, and Moreau, Jean-Louis. Tractabel: Les métamorphoses d'un groupe industriel. Brussels: Fonds Mercator, 1995.
Brooks, Alfred H., and La Croix, Morris F. The Iron and Associated Industries of Lorraine, the Sarre District, Luxemburg, and Belgium. United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey. Washington, DC: GPO, 1920.
Burn, Duncan Lyall. The Economic History of Steelmaking 1867-1939: A Study in Competition. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1940.
Cadot, Olivier, Carrère, Céline, and Strauss-Kahn, Vanessa. “Trade Diversification, Income, and Growth: What Do We Know?Journal of Economic Surveys 26, no. 4 (2012): 123.
Cassiers, Isabelle. Crosssance, crise et régulation en économie ouverte: La Belgique entre les deux guerres. Brussels: De Boeck-Wesmael, 1989.
Chaney, Thomas. “Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade.” American Economic Review 98, no. 4 (2008): 1707–21.
Crozet, Matthieu, and Koenig, Pamina. “Structural Gravity Equations With Intensive and Extensive Margins.” Canadian Journal of Economics 43, no. 1 (2010): 4162.
Delbeke, Jos. “The Mechanization of Flemish Industry, 1812-1930. The Case of Antwerp.” Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Workshop on Quantitative Economic History, Working Paper No. 8103, Leuven, Belgium, 1982.
De Brabander, Guido L. Regional Specialization, Employment and Economic Growth in Belgium Between 1846 and 1970. New York: Arno Press, 1981.
Degrève, Daniel. Le commerce extérieur de la Belgique, 1830-1913-1939: Présentation critique des données statistiques. Brussels: Palais des Académies, 1982.
De Leener, Georges. Ce qui manque au commerce belge d'exportation. 1906. (Reprinted by Kessinger Legacy Reprints, Whitefish MT, 2013.)
De Leener, Georges. “Le commerce extérieur.” In La Belgique Restaurée, edited by Mahaim, Ernest, 251–96. Brussels: Maurice Lamertin, 1926.
Douxchamps, Yves. “L'évolution séculaire de l'industrie du verre à vitres et de glacerie en Belgique du 1823 à 1913.” Bulletin de l'Institut de Recherche Économiques et Sociales, no. 5 (1951): 451517.
Dutt, Pushan, Mihov, Ilian, and Van Zandt, Timothy. “The Effect of WTO on the Extensive and Intensive Margins of Trade.” INSEAD Working Paper No. 38/EPS, Fontainebleau, France, 2013.
Federico, Giovanni, and Tena, Antonio. “On the Accuracy of Foreign Trade Statistics (1909-1935): Morgenstern Revisited.” Explorations in Economic History 28, no. 3 (1991): 259–73.
Ferguson, Shon, and Forslid, Rikard. “Sizing Up the Impact of Embassies on Exports.” Research Institute of Industrial Economics Working Paper, series 1012, Stockholm, Sweden, 2014.
Frankel, Jeffrey A., and Romer, David. “Does Trade Cause Growth?”  American Economic Review 89, no. 3 (1999): 379–99.
Gadisseur, Jean. “Le produit physique de l'économie belge, 1831-1913.” Ph.D. diss., Université de Liège, 1980.
Gadisseur, Jean. “Output per Worker and its Evolution in Belgian Industry, 1846-1910.” In The Economic Development of Belgium Since 1870, edited by Van der Wee, Herman and Blomme, Jan, 175–85. Lyme, NH: Edward Elgar, 1997.
Girma, Sourafel, Greenaway, David, and Kneller, Richard. “Does Exporting Increase Productivity? A Microeconometric Analysis of Matched Firms.” Review of International Economics 12, no. 5 (2004): 855–66.
Gleditsch, Kristian, and Ward, Michael D.Measuring Space: A Minimum Distance Database.” Journal of Peace Research 38, no. 6 (2001): 749–68.∼ksg/mindist.html (accessed 17 December 2014).
Grossman, Gene. “Comment on Alan V. Deardorff, Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World?” In The Regionalization of the World Economy, edited by Frankel, Jeffrey A., 29–31. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
Harley, C. Knick. “Ocean Freight Rates and Productivity, 1740-1913: The Primacy of Mechanical Invention Reaffirmed.” Journal of Economic History 48, no. 4 (1988): 851–76.
Horlings, Edwin. “The International Trade of a Small and Open Economy. Revised Estimates of the Imports and Exports of Belgium, 1835-1990.” NEHA-Jaarboek 65 (1997): 110–42.
Horlings, Edwin, and Smits, Jan-Pieter. “A Comparison of the Pattern of Growth and Structural Change in the Netherlands and Belgium, 1800-1913.” Jahrbuch fur Wirtschaftsgeshichte 38, no. 2 (2002): 83–106.
Huberman, Michael. “Ticket to Trade: Belgian Labour and Globalization Before 1914.” Economic History Review 61, no. 2 (2008): 326–59.
Huberman, Michael. Odd Couple: International Trade and Labor Standards in History. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012.
Huberman, Michael, Meissner, Christopher M., and Oosterlinck, Kim. “Globalization Everywhere, Except in the Growth Numbers: Pessimism Reaffirmed.” Voxeu, 2015. (20 August 2016).
Jacks, David, Meissner, Christopher M., and Novy, Denis. “Trade Costs in the First Wave of Globalization.” Explorations in Economic History 47, no. 2(2010): 127–41.
Jacks, David, and Pendakur, Krishna. “Global Trade and the Maritime Transport Revolution.” Review of Economics and Statistics 92, no. 4 (2011): 745–55.
Krugman, Paul. “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9, no. 4 (1979): 469–79.
Lampe, Markus. Explaining Nineteenth-Century Bilateralism of the Cobden-Chevalier Network.” Economic History Review 64, no. 2 (2011): 644–68.
Lawless, Martina. “Deconstructing Gravity: Trade Costs and Extensive and Intensive Margins.” Canadian Journal of Economics 43, no. 4 (2010a): 1149–72.
Lawless, Martina. (2010b). “Geography and Firm Exports: New Evidence on the Nature of Sunk Costs.” Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv) 146, no. 4 (2010b): 691–707.
Liu, Dan and Meissner, Christopher M.Market Potential and the Rise of US Productivity Leadership.” Journal of International Economics 96, no. 1 (2015): 7287.
López-Córdova, J. Ernesto, and Meissner, Christopher M.Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era.” American Economic Review 93, no. 1 (2003): 344–53.
Loyen, Reginald. “Throughput in the Port of Antwerp (1901-2000): An Integrated Functional Approach.” In Struggling for Leadership: Antwerp-Rotterdam Port Competition, edited by Loyen, Reginald, Buyst, Erik, and Devos, Greta, 29–86. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag Publishers, 2002.
Maddison, Angus. “Historical Statistics of the World Economy: 1-2008 AD.” (accessed 20 September 2015).
Maddison, Angus. Monitoring the World Economy. OECD Development Centre, Paris, 1995.
Martínez López, Alberte. “Belgian Investment in Tramways and Light Railways: An International Approach, 1892-1935.” Journal of Transport History 24, no. 1 (2003): 5977.
Melitz, Marc J.The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71, no. 6 (2003): 1695–725.
Melitz, Marc J., and Ottaviano, Gianmarco. “Market Size, Trade, and Productivity.” The Review of Economic Studies 75, no. 1 (2008): 295316.
Melitz, Marc J., and Trefler, Daniel. “Gains From Trade When Firms Matter.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26, no. 2 (2012): 91118.
Mitchener, Kris James, and Weidenmier, Marc. “Trade and Empire.” Economic Journal 118, no. 533 (2008): 1805–34.
North, Douglass C.Ocean Freight Rates and Economic Development 1750-1913.” Journal of Economic History 18, no. 4 (1958): 537–55.
Nunn, Nathan, and Trefler, Daniel. “Domestic Institutions as a Source of Comparative Advantage.” NBER Working Paper No. 18851, Cambridge, MA, 2013.
Officer, Lawrence H. (2014). “Gold Standard.” (accessed 17 December 2014).
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Williamson, Jeffrey G. Globalization and History: The Evolution of a Nineteenth-Century Atlantic Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
Pahre, Robert. Politics and Trade Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century. The ‘Agreeable Customs' of 1815-1914. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Rauch, James. “Networks Versus Markets in International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 48, no. 1 (1999): 735.
Rodrik, Dani. The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York: Norton, 2011.
Silva, Santos, João, M.C., Tenreyro, Silvana, and Wei, Kehai. “Estimating the Extensive Margin of Trade.” Journal of International Economics 93, no. 1 (2014): 6775.
Saxonhouse, Gary, and Wright, Gavin. “Technological Evolution in Cotton Spinning, 1878-1933.” In The Fibre That Changed the World: The Cotton Industry in International Perspective, 1600-1990s, edited by Farnie, Douglas A. and Jeremy, David J., 129–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Scholliers, Peter. “A Century of Real Industrial Wages in Belgium, 1840-1939.” In Labour's Reward: Real Wages and Economic Change in 19th- and 20th-century Europe, edited by Scholliers, Peter and Zamagni, Vera, 106–37. Aldershot, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 1995.
Shah, Mohammed, Saif, I., and Williamson, Jeffrey G.Freight Rates and Productivity Gains in British Tramp Shipping 1869-1950.” Explorations in Economic History 41, no. 2 (2004): 172–203.
Segerstrom, Paul. S., and Sugita, Yoichi. “The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Industrial Productivity.” Journal of the European Economic Association 13, no. 6 (2015): 1167–79.
Smits, Jan-Pieter, Woltjer, Pieter J., and Ma, Debin. “A Dataset on Comparative Historical National Accounts, ca. 1870-1950: A Time-Series Perspective.” Groningen Growth and Development Centre Research Memorandum GD-107, University of Groningen, Netherlands, 2009.
Statesman's Yearbook. London: Macmillan, various years.
Suykens, F. Antwerp: A Port For All Seasons. Antwerp: MIM Publishing Company, 1986.
Traités de commerce et de navigation. Conventions relatives aux attributions consulaires. Braine-le-comte: Zech et fils, 1900.
Van der Wee, Herman. “Large Firms in Belgium, 1892-1974: An Analysis of their Structure and Growth.” In Enterprise and History: Essays in Honour of Charles Wilson, edited by Coleman, D.C. and Mathias, Peter, 199–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.
Van der Wee, Herman, and Goossens, Marine. “Belgium.” In International Banking, 1870-1914, edited by Bovykin, V.I. and Cameron, Rondo, 113–28. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Van Houtte, F-X. L'évolution de l'industrie textile en Belgique et dans le monde de 1800 à 1939. Leuven: E. Nauwelaerts, 1949.
Yi, Kei-Mu. “Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?Journal of Political Economy 111, no. 1 (2003): 52102.

Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade

  • Michael Huberman (a1), Christopher M. Meissner (a2) and Kim Oosterlinck (a3)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed