Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade

  • Michael Huberman (a1), Christopher M. Meissner (a2) and Kim Oosterlinck (a3)
Abstract

Belle Époque Belgium recorded an unprecedented trade boom. Exploiting a new granular trade dataset, we find that the number of products delivered abroad and destinations serviced more than doubled in less than 40 years. To explain this remarkable achievement, we study the relationship between trade costs and the intensive and extensive margins of trade. The establishment of a foreign diplomatic network that lowered beachhead costs and enabled the entry of new products was an essential fact of the trade boom. Interestingly, the expansion in trade in certain sectors did not translate into faster productivity growth. We offer some explanations.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Technology and Geography in the Second Industrial Revolution: New Evidence from the Margins of Trade
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

We benefited from the comments of participants in conferences and seminars at the 2014 meetings of the Economic History Association, Universitat de Barcelona, University of California, Berkeley, University of California, Los Angeles, University of Cambridge, CREST/INSEE/Polytechnique, Université de Genève, Paris School of Economics, Université Paris-Dauphine, Université Paris-Sud, Northwestern University, Queen's University, Universidade de São Paulo, the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, and the University of Southern Denmark, Odense. We also thank Concepción Betrán, Dan Liu, Jose de Sousa, and John Tang for their suggestions, and Walter Steingress for excellent research assistance. The usual disclaimer applies.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Facundo Albornoz , F Hector . Calvo Pardo , Gregory Corcos , et al. “Sequential Exporting.” Journal of International Economics 88, no. 1 (2012): 1731.

Richard E. Baldwin , and Frédéric Robert-Nicoud . “Trade and Growth with Heterogeneous Firms.” Journal of International Economics 74, no. 1 (2008): 21–34.

Richard E. Baldwin , and Rikard Forslid . “Trade Liberalization with Heterogeneous Firms.” Review of Development Economics 14, no. 1 (2010): 161–76.

Andrew B. Bernard , J. Bradford Jensen , Stephen J. Redding , et al. (2009). “The Margins of U.S. Trade (Long Version).” NBER Working Paper No. 14662, Cambridge, MA, 2009.

Tibor Besedeš , and Thomas J. Prusa Ins, Outs, and the Duration of Trade.” Canadian Journal of Economics 39, no. 1 (2006): 266295.

Concepción Betrán , and Michael Huberman . “International Competition in the First Wave of Globalization: New Evidence on the Margins of Trade.” Economic History Review 69, no. 1 (2016): 258–87.

Ron A. Boschma The Rise of Clusters of Innovative Industries in Belgium During the Industrial Epoch.” Research Policy 28, no. 5 (1999): 853–71.

Thomas Chaney . “Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade.” American Economic Review 98, no. 4 (2008): 1707–21.

Matthieu Crozet , and Pamina Koenig . “Structural Gravity Equations With Intensive and Extensive Margins.” Canadian Journal of Economics 43, no. 1 (2010): 4162.

Giovanni Federico , and Antonio Tena . “On the Accuracy of Foreign Trade Statistics (1909-1935): Morgenstern Revisited.” Explorations in Economic History 28, no. 3 (1991): 259–73.

Jeffrey A. Frankel , and David Romer . “Does Trade Cause Growth?”  American Economic Review 89, no. 3 (1999): 379–99.

Sourafel Girma , David Greenaway , and Richard Kneller . “Does Exporting Increase Productivity? A Microeconometric Analysis of Matched Firms.” Review of International Economics 12, no. 5 (2004): 855–66.

Kristian Gleditsch , and Michael D. Ward Measuring Space: A Minimum Distance Database.” Journal of Peace Research 38, no. 6 (2001): 749–68. http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/∼ksg/mindist.html (accessed 17 December 2014).

C. Knick Harley . “Ocean Freight Rates and Productivity, 1740-1913: The Primacy of Mechanical Invention Reaffirmed.” Journal of Economic History 48, no. 4 (1988): 851–76.

Michael Huberman . “Ticket to Trade: Belgian Labour and Globalization Before 1914.” Economic History Review 61, no. 2 (2008): 326–59.

David Jacks , Christopher M. Meissner , and Denis Novy . “Trade Costs in the First Wave of Globalization.” Explorations in Economic History 47, no. 2(2010): 127–41.

Paul Krugman . “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9, no. 4 (1979): 469–79.

Markus Lampe . Explaining Nineteenth-Century Bilateralism of the Cobden-Chevalier Network.” Economic History Review 64, no. 2 (2011): 644–68.

Martina Lawless . “Deconstructing Gravity: Trade Costs and Extensive and Intensive Margins.” Canadian Journal of Economics 43, no. 4 (2010a): 1149–72.

Dan Liu and Christopher M. Meissner Market Potential and the Rise of US Productivity Leadership.” Journal of International Economics 96, no. 1 (2015): 7287.

J. Ernesto López-Córdova , and Christopher M. Meissner Exchange-Rate Regimes and International Trade: Evidence from the Classical Gold Standard Era.” American Economic Review 93, no. 1 (2003): 344–53.

Alberte Martínez López . “Belgian Investment in Tramways and Light Railways: An International Approach, 1892-1935.” Journal of Transport History 24, no. 1 (2003): 5977.

Marc J. Melitz The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity.” Econometrica 71, no. 6 (2003): 1695–725.

Marc J. Melitz , and Gianmarco Ottaviano . “Market Size, Trade, and Productivity.” The Review of Economic Studies 75, no. 1 (2008): 295316.

Marc J. Melitz , and Daniel Trefler . “Gains From Trade When Firms Matter.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26, no. 2 (2012): 91118.

Kris James Mitchener , and Marc Weidenmier . “Trade and Empire.” Economic Journal 118, no. 533 (2008): 1805–34.

Douglass C. North Ocean Freight Rates and Economic Development 1750-1913.” Journal of Economic History 18, no. 4 (1958): 537–55.

Nathan Nunn , and Daniel Trefler . “Domestic Institutions as a Source of Comparative Advantage.” NBER Working Paper No. 18851, Cambridge, MA, 2013.

Robert Pahre . Politics and Trade Cooperation in the Nineteenth Century. The ‘Agreeable Customs' of 1815-1914. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

James Rauch . “Networks Versus Markets in International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 48, no. 1 (1999): 735.

Santos Silva , M.C. João , Silvana Tenreyro , and Kehai Wei . “Estimating the Extensive Margin of Trade.” Journal of International Economics 93, no. 1 (2014): 6775.

Paul. S. Segerstrom , and Yoichi Sugita . “The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Industrial Productivity.” Journal of the European Economic Association 13, no. 6 (2015): 1167–79.

Herman Van der Wee . “Large Firms in Belgium, 1892-1974: An Analysis of their Structure and Growth.” In Enterprise and History: Essays in Honour of Charles Wilson, edited by D.C. Coleman and Peter Mathias , 199–212. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

Kei-Mu Yi . “Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?Journal of Political Economy 111, no. 1 (2003): 52102.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Journal of Economic History
  • ISSN: 0022-0507
  • EISSN: 1471-6372
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 35
Total number of PDF views: 370 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 628 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st February 2017 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.