Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Yankees of Europe? A New View on Technology and Productivity in German Manufacturing in the Early Twentieth Century

  • Marcel P. Timmer (a1), Joost Veenstra (a2) and Pieter J. Woltjer (a3)


Labor productivity in German manufacturing lagged persistently behind the United States in the early twentieth century. Traditionally, this is attributed to dichotomous technology paths across the Atlantic. However, various industry case studies suggest rapid diffusion of U.S. technologies in Germany. We develop a novel decomposition framework based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to reconcile these findings. We conclude that by 1936 inefficient assimilation of modern production techniques—and not the use of different techniques—accounted for most of the U.S./German labor-productivity gap. Our findings call for a reappraisal of the drivers behind cross-country differences in manufacturing performance.



Hide All

We thank Herman de Jong for providing us with his copies of the unpublished archival records of the German production census of 1936 and Tamás Vonyó for suggesting the title of the article. We are indebted to Paul Rhode, whose help has guided us to substantially improve the article. Furthermore, we thank Jochen Streb, Stephen Broadberry, Jan Luiten van Zanden, two anonymous referees and the participants of the 2012 World Economic History Conference, the 2014 Economic History Society Annual Conference, and the Wirtschaftsgeschichte Forschungsseminar at the University of Mannheim for useful comments and suggestions. We are responsible for all errors. This research was supported by a grant of the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO; grant no. 360-53-102).



Hide All
Abramovitz, M. “Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870.” American Economic Review 46, no. 2 1956: 523
Allen, Robert C. “Technology and the Great Divergence: Global Economic Development since 1820.” Explorations in Economic History 49, no. 1 2012: 116.
Arrow, Kenneth J. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, 609–26. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962.
Atkinson, Anthony B., and Stiglitz, Joseph E.. “A New View of Technological Change.” Economic Journal 79, no. 315 1969: 573–78.
Basu, Susanto, and Weil, David N.. “Appropriate Technology and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, no. 4 1998: 1025–54.
Berthold, Rudolf, ed. Produktivkräfte in Deutschland 1917/18 bis 1945. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1988.
Board of Trade. Final Report on the Fourth Census of Production of the United Kingdom. London: H.M. Stationery Office, 1930.
Braun, Hans-Joachim. “The National Association of German-American Technologists and Technology Transfer between Germany and the United States.” In History of Technology, edited by Smith, Norman, 1535. Mansell Publishing Limited, 1984.
Broadberry, Stephen N. “Technological Leadership and Productivity Leadership in Manufacturing since the Industrial Revolution: Implications for the Convergence Debate.” Economic Journal 104, no. 423 1994: 291302.
Broadberry, Stephen N. The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850–1990. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Burhop, Carsten. “Comparative Productivity in British and German Manufacturing Before World War II: Reconciling Direct Benchmark Estimates and Time Series Projections.” Journal of Economic History 67, no. 2 2007: 315–49.
Broadberry, Stephen N., and Fremdling, Rainer. “Comparative Productivity in British and German Industry 1907–37.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52, no. 4 1990: 403–21.
Chandler, Alfred. Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Harvard: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Chandler, Alfred. “Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, no. 3 1992: 79100.
Crafts, Nicholas F.R.Steam as a General Purpose Technology: A Growth Accounting Perspective.” Economic Journal 114, no. 495 2004: 338–51.
David, Paul A. Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth. Essays on American and British Experience in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
de Jong, Herman. Catching Up Twice: The Nature of Dutch Industrial Growth During the Twentieth Century in a Comparative Perspective. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2003.
de Jong, Herman, and Woltjer, Pieter J.. “Depression Dynamics: A New Estimate of the Anglo-American Manufacturing Productivity Gap in the Interwar Period.” Economic History Review 64, no. 2 2011: 472–92.
Devine, Warren D. “From Shafts to Wires: Historical Perspective on Electrification.” Journal of Economic History 43, no. 2 1983: 347–72.
Fabricant, Solomon. The Output of Manufacturing Industries, 1899–1937. New York: National Bureau Economic Analysis, 1940.
Fabricant, Solomon. Employment in manufacturing, 1899–1939. New York: National Bureau Economic Analysis, 1942.
Färe, Rolf, Grosskopf, Shawna, and Lovell, Knox C.A.. Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Feinstein, Charles H. National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
Field, Alexander J. “On the Unimportance of Machinery.” Explorations in Economic History 22, no. 4 1985: 378401.
Field, Alexander J. “The Most Technologically Progressive Decade of the Century.” American Economic Review 93, no. 4 2003: 1399–413.
Fremdling, Rainer, de Jong, Herman, and Timmer, Marcel P.. “British and German Manufacturing Productivity Compared: A New Benchmark for 1935/36 Based on Double Deflated Value Added.” Journal of Economic History 67, no. 2 2007: 350–78.
Gerschenkron, Alexander. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective: A Book of Essays. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1962.
Habakkuk, John. American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century. The Search for Labour-saving Inventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962.
Hannah, Leslie. “Logistics, Market Size, and Giant Plants in the Early Twentieth Century: A Global View.” Journal of Economic History 68, no. 1 2008: 4679.
Hoffmann, Walther G. Das Wachstum der Deutschen Wirtschaft seit der Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts. Berlin, 1965.
Inklaar, Robert, de Jong, Herman, and Gouma, Reitze. “Did Technology Shocks Drive the Great Depression? Explaining Cyclical Productivity Movements in U.S. Manufacturing, 1919–1939.” Journal of Economic History 71, no. 4 2011: 827–58.
Jerome, Harry. Mechanization in Industry. Vol. 27. National Bureau of Economic Research, 1934.
Keck, Otto. “The National System for Technical Innovation in Germany.” In National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, edited by Nelson, Richard R., 115–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
Kendrick, John W. Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton: National Bureau Economic Research, 1961.
Kindleberger, Charles P. Economic Response: Comparative Studies in Trade, Finance, and Growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978.
Kinghorn, R. Janice, and Nye, John V.. “The Scale of Production in Western Economic Development.” Journal of Economic History 56, no. 1 1996: 90112.
Kumar, Subodh, and Russell, Robert R.. “Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence.” American Economic Review 92, no. 3 2002: 527–48.
Los, Bart, and Timmer, Marcel P.. “The ‘Appropriate Technology’ Explanation of Productivity Growth Differentials: An Empirical Approach.” Journal of Development Economics 77, no. 2 2005: 517–31.
Nolan, Mary. Visions of Modernity. American Business and the Modernization of Germany. Oxford University Press, 1994.
Radkau, Joachim. Technik in Deutschland. Vom 18. Jahrhundert bis Heute. 1989.
Richter, Ralf. “Technology and Knowledge Transfer in the Machine Tool Industry - The United States and Germany, 1870–1930.” Essays in Economic and Business History 26 2008: 173–88.
Richter, Ralf, and Streb, Jochen. “Catching-Up and Falling Behind: Knowledge Spillover from American to German Machine Toolmakers.” Journal of Economic History 71, no. 4 2011: 1006–31.
Ristuccia, Cristiano A., and Tooze, Adam. “Machine Tools and Mass Production in the Armaments Boom: Germany and the United States, 1929–44.” Economic History Review 66, no. 4 2013: 953–74.
Rosenberg, Nathan. Exploring the Black Box. Technology, Economics, and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Rostas, Laszlo. Comparative Productivity in British and American Industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1948.
Rothbarth, Erwin. “Causes of the Superior Efficiency of U.S.A. Industry as Compared with British Industry.” Economic Journal 56, no. 223 1946: 383–90.
Schurr, Sam H., Burwell, Calvin C., Devine, Warren D., et al. Electricity in the American Economy: Agent of Technological Progress. Seattle: Praeger, 1990.
Solow, Robert M. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, no. 1 1956: 6594.
Temin, Peter. “Labour Scarcity in America.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 1, no. 2 1971: 251–64.
Veenstra, Joost, and de Jong, Herman J.. “A Tale of Two Tails: Establishment Size and Labor Productivity in United States and German Manufacturing at the Start of the Twentieth Century.” Australian Economic History Review 56, no. 2 2016. Available online at
Woltjer, Pieter. “Taking Over: A New Appraisal of the Anglo-American Productivity Gap and the Nature of American Economic Leadership ca. 1910.” Scandinavian Economic History Review 63, no. 3 2015: 280301.


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed