Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-688nx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-08T00:29:19.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Displacing Misinformation about Events: An Experimental Test of Causal Corrections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2015

Brendan Nyhan
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; e-mail: nyhan@dartmouth.edu
Jason Reifler
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom; e-mail: J.Reifler@exeter.ac.uk

Abstract

Misinformation can be very difficult to correct and may have lasting effects even after it is discredited. One reason for this persistence is the manner in which people make causal inferences based on available information about a given event or outcome. As a result, false information may continue to influence beliefs and attitudes even after being debunked if it is not replaced by an alternate causal explanation. We test this hypothesis using an experimental paradigm adapted from the psychology literature on the continued influence effect and find that a causal explanation for an unexplained event is significantly more effective than a denial even when the denial is backed by unusually strong evidence. This result has significant implications for how to most effectively counter misinformation about controversial political events and outcomes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Nyhan and Reifler supplementary material

Appendix

Download Nyhan and Reifler supplementary material(File)
File 76 KB