No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Estimating the Persistence of Party Cue Influence in a Panel Survey Experiment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 August 2021
Abstract
Perhaps hundreds of survey experiments have shown that political party cues influence people’s policy opinions. However, we know little about the persistence of this influence: is it a transient priming effect, dissipating moments after the survey is over, or does influence persist for longer, indicating learning? We report the results of a panel survey experiment in which US adults were randomly exposed to party cues on five contemporary US policy issues in an initial survey and gave their opinions. A follow-up survey 3 days later polled their opinions again. We find that the influence of the party cues persists at ∼50% its original magnitude at follow-up. Notably, our design rules out that people simply remembered how they previously answered. Our findings have implications for understanding the scope and mechanism of party cue influence as it occurs in the real world and provide a benchmark for future research on this topic.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Open Practices
Open data
Open materials
- Copyright
- © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association
References
Barabas, Jason and Jerit, Jennifer. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?” American Political Science Review 104(2): 226–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2020. “Party Cues.” The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190860806.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190860806-e-2 (February 18, 2020).Google Scholar
Bürkner, Paul-Christian. 2017. “Brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan.” Journal of Statistical Software 80(1): 1–28.Google Scholar
Cohen, Geoffrey L. 2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(5): 808–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppock, Alexander, Ekins, Emily and Kirby, David. 2018. “The Long-Lasting Effects of Newspaper Op-Eds on Public Opinion.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 13(1): 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Alexander. 2019. “Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach.” Political Science Research and Methods 7(3): 613–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppock, Alexander. 2021. Persuasion in Parallel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gaines, Brian J., Kuklinski, James H. and Quirk, Paul J.. 2007. “The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined.” Political Analysis 15(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuziemko, Ilyana, Norton, Michael I., Saez, Emmanuel and Stantcheva, Stefanie. 2015. “How Elastic Are Preferences for Redistribution? Evidence from Randomized Survey Experiments.” American Economic Review 105(4): 1478–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecheler, Sophie and de Vreese, Claes H.. 2016. “How Long Do News Framing Effects Last? A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.” Annals of the International Communication Association 40(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElreath, Richard. 2020. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and STAN. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1993. “Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues.” Political Behavior 15(2): 167–92.Google Scholar
Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N. and Jeremy, Freese. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments*.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56(1): 52–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slothuus, Rune and Bisgaard, Martin. 2020. “How Political Parties Shape Public Opinion in the Real World.” American Journal of Political Science. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajps.12550 (November 5, 2020).Google Scholar
Tappin, Ben M. 2020. Estimating the Between-Issue Variation in Party Elite Cue Effects. PsyArXiv. preprint. https://osf.io/p48zb (October 8, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappin, Ben M. and Hewitt, Luke B.. 2021. “Replication Data for: Estimating the Persistence of Party Cue Influence in a Panel Survey Experiment.” Harvard Dataverse V1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/WHBRYN.Google Scholar
Tappin, Ben M. and McKay, Ryan. 2021. “Estimating the Causal Effects of Cognitive Effort and Policy Information on Party Cue Influence.” https://psyarxiv.com/tdk3y/ (February 14, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Brian E., Lane, Daniel S. and Hahn, Lauren B.. 2021. “Online Incidental Exposure to News Can Minimize Interest-Based Political Knowledge Gaps: Evidence from Two U.S. Elections.” The International Journal of Press/Politics: 1940161221991550.Google Scholar
Zaller, John R. 2012. “What Nature and Origins Leaves Out.” Critical Review 24(4): 569–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappin and Hewitt supplementary material
Appendix
PDF
14.7 MB