Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

“Friends-and-Neighbors” Mobilization: A Field Experimental Replication and Extension

  • Costas Panagopoulos (a1) and Kendall Bailey (a2)
Abstract

Key [1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: A.A. Knopf] observed voters tend to support local candidates at higher rates, a phenomenon he termed “friends-and-neighbors” voting. In a recent study, Panagopoulos et al. [2017. Political Behavior 39(4): 865–82] deployed a nonpartisan randomized field experiment to show that voters in the September 2014 primary election for state senate in Massachusetts were mobilized on the basis of shared geography. County ties and, to a lesser extent, hometown ties between voters and candidates have the capacity to drive voters to the polls. We partnered with a national party organization to conduct a similar, partisan experiment in the November 2014 general election for the Pennsylvania state senate. We find localism cues can stimulate voting in elections, including in neighboring communities that lie beyond the towns and counties in which the target candidate resided, at least among voters favorably disposed to a candidate and even when voters reside in the home county of the opponent.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: c.panagopoulos@northeastern.edu
Footnotes
Hide All

The study we describe in this article was conceptualized as an extension of Panagopoulos, Leighley and Hamel (2017). We are indebted to both Jan Leighley and Brian Hamel for their collaboration and support for this research program and for their contributions to both studies. Financial support for this research was provided by the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee. The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ET8QLG.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aspin, Larry T. and Hall, William K.. 1987. The Friends and Neighbors Effect in Judicial Retention Elections. Political Research Quarterly 40(4): 703–15.
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., and Adamic, L.. 2012. The Role of Social Networks in Information Diffusion. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. New York, NY, USA, 519528.
Brewer, M. B. 1993. Social Identity, Distinctiveness, and In-Group Homogeneity. Social Cognition 11(1): 150–64.
Brewer, M. B. 1999. Social Identity, Distinctiveness, and In-Group Homogeneity. Social Cognition 11(1): 150–64.
Brunk, Gregory G., Ramesh, Subha, and Adams, John. 1988. Contagion-Based Voting in Birmingham, Alabama. Political Geography Quarterly 7(1): 3947.
Calhoun, C. 1994. Social Theory and the Politics of Identity. In Social Theory and the Politics of Identity, ed. Calhoun, Charles. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Constant, D., Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S.. 1996. The Kindness of Strangers: The Usefulness of Electronic Weak Ties for Technical Advice. Organization Science 7(2): 119–35.
Cross, R. and Cummings, J. N.. 2004. Tie and Network Correlates of Individual Performance in Knowledge-Intensive Work. The Academy of Management Journal 47(6): 928–37.
Desposato, Scott W. and Petrocik, John R.. 2003. The Variable Incumbency Advantage: New Voters, Redistricting, and the Personal Vote. American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 1832.
Dudley, Robert L. and Rapoport, Ronald B.. 1989. Vice-Presidential Candidates and the Home State Advantage: Playing Second Banana at Home and On the Road. American Journal of Political Science 33(2): 537–40.
Garand, James C. 1988. Localism and Regionalism in Presidential Elections: Is There a Home State or Regional Advantage? Western Political Quarterly 41(1): 85103.
Gerber, A. S. and Green, D. P.. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. New York: W.W. Norton.
Gimpel, J. G., Karnes, K. A., McTague, J., and Pearson-Merkowitz, S.. 2008. Distance-Decay in the Political Geography of Friends-and-Neighbors Voting. Political Geography 27(2): 231–52.
Granovetter, M. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–80.
Green, D. and Geber, A.. 2015. Get Out the Vote! 3rd ed. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Green, Donald P. and Gerber, Alan S.. 2008. Get Out the Vote: How to Increase Voter Turnout. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Holbrook, Thomas M. 1991. Presidential Elections in Space and Time. American Journal of Political Science 35(1): 91109.
Key, V. O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: A.A. Knopf.
Kjar, S. A. and Laband, D. N.. 2002. On the ‘Home Grown-Ness’ in Politics: Evidence from the 1998 Election for Alabama’s Third Congressional District. Public Choice 112(1/2): 143–50.
Lawler, E. 1992. Affective Attachments to Nested Groups: A Choice-Process Theory. American Sociological Review 57(3): 327–39.
Levin, D. Z. and Cross, R.. 2004. The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science 50(11): 1477–90.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Rice, Tom W.. 1983. Localism in Presidential Elections: The Home State Advantage. American Journal of Political Science 27(3): 548–56.
McKee, Seth C. 2008. Redistricting and Familiarity with U.S. House Candidates. American Politics Research 36(6): 962–79.
Medrano, J. D. and Gutiérrez, Paula. 2001. Nested Identities: National and European Identity in Spain. Ethnic and Racial Studies 24(5): 753–78.
Meredith, Marc. n.d. Heterogeneous Friends-and-Neighbors Voting. Unpublished Manuscript. University of Pennsylvania.
Mixon, F. G. and Tyrone, J. M.. 2004. The “Home-Grown” Presidency: Empirical Evidence on Localism in Presidential Voting, 1972-200. Applied Economics 36(16): 1745–9.
Morrison, E. W. 2002. Newcomers’ Relationships: The Role of Social Network Ties During Socialization. The Academy of Management Journal 45(6): 1149–60.
Panagopoulos, Costas and Bailey, Kendall. 2018. Replication Data for: Panagopoulos and Bailey “Friends-and-Neighbors” Mobilization: A Field Experimental Test in a General Election Context. Harvard Dataverse, V1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ET8QLG
Panagopoulos, Costas, Leighley, Jan E., and Hamel, Brian. 2017. Are Voters Mobilized by a ‘Friend-and-Neighbor’ on the Ballot? Evidence from a Field Experiment. Political Behavior 39(4): 865–82.
Pierce, David. 2013. Scavello Will Run for New Senate Seat in Monroe County. (http://www.poconorecord.com/article/20130913/NEWS/309130353, accessed June 5, 2015.
Rice, Tom W. and Macht, Alica A.. 1987a. Friends and Neighbors Voting in Statewide General Elections. American Journal of Political Science 31(2): 448–52.
Rice, Tom W. and Macht, Alisa A.. 1987b. The Home Town Advantage: Mobilization or Conversion? Political Behavior 9(3): 257–62.
Tajfel, H. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajfel, H., ed. 1982. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tatalovich, Raymond. 1975. “Friends and Neighbors” Voting: Mississippi, 1943-73. Voting: Mississippi 37(3): 807–14.
Turner, J. C. 1975. Social Comparison and Social Identity: Some Prospects for Intergroup Behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology 5: 534.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Panagopoulos and Bailey Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed