Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Improving Electoral Integrity with Information and Communications Technology

  • Michael Callen (a1), Clark C. Gibson (a2), Danielle F. Jung (a3) and James D. Long (a4)
Abstract

Irregularities plague elections in developing democracies. The international community spends hundreds of millions of dollars on election observation, with little robust evidence that it consistently improves electoral integrity. We conducted a randomized control trial to measure the effect of an intervention to detect and deter electoral irregularities employing a nation-wide sample of polling stations in Uganda using scalable information and communications technology (ICT). In treatment stations, researchers delivered letters to polling officials stating that tallies would be photographed using smartphones and compared against official results. Compared to stations with no letters, the letters increased the frequency of posted tallies by polling center managers in compliance with the law; decreased the number of sequential digits found on tallies – a fraud indicator; and decreased the vote share for the incumbent president in some specifications. Our results demonstrate that a cost-effective citizen and ICT intervention can improve electoral integrity in emerging democracies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Improving Electoral Integrity with Information and Communications Technology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Improving Electoral Integrity with Information and Communications Technology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Improving Electoral Integrity with Information and Communications Technology
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Beber, B., and Scacco, A.. 2012. “What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud.” Political Analysis 20 (2): 211–34.
Becker, G. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76: 169217.
Becker, G., and Stigler, G.. 1974. “Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers.” Journal of Legal Studies 3 (1): 118.
Björkman, M., and Svensson, J.. 2009. “Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2): 735–69.
Bjornlund, E. 2004. Beyond Free and Fair: Monitoring Elections and Building Democracy. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
Bjornlund, E., Bratton, M., and Gibson, C.. 1992. “Observing Multiparty Elections in Africa: Lessons from Zambia.” African Affairs 91 (364): 405–31.
Bond, R., Fariss, C., Jones, J., Kramer, A., Marlow, C., and Settle, J.. 2012. “A 61-million-person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization.” Nature 489 (7415): 295–98.
Bruhn, M., and McKenzie, D. 2009. “In Pursuit of Balance: Randomization in Practice in Development Field Experiments.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1 (4): 200–32.
Callen, M., and Long, J. D.. 2015. “Institutional Corruption and Election Fraud: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanistan.” American Economic Review 105 (1): 354–81.
Cohen, J. 2008. “Uganda Confronts Corruption, Slowly.” Science 321 (5888): 522–25.
Enikolopov, R., Korovkin, V., Petrova, M., Sonin, K., and Zakharov, A.. 2013. “Field Experiment Estimate of Electoral Fraud in Russian Parliamentary Elections.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110 (2): 448–52.
European Union. 2006. “European Union: External Action FAQ.” www.eeas.europa.eu/, accessed November 4, 2013.
European Union. 2011. “Final Report on Uganda's General Elections 18 February 2011.” (http://eeas.europa.eu/eueom/pdf/missions/eueom_uganda2011_final_report_en.pdf), accessed November 4, 2013.
European Union. 2013. “EU Election Observation Missions.” (http://www.eueom.eu/home), accessed November 4, 2013.
Ferraz, C., and Finan, F.. 2008. “Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effect of Brazil's Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2): 703–45.
Hyde, S. 2007. “The Observer Effect in International Politics: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” World Politics 60 (1): 3763.
Hyde, S. 2010. “Experimenting in Democracy Promotion: International Observers and the 2004 Presidential Elections in Indonesia.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (2): 511–27.
Hyde, S. 2011. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Monitoring Became an International Norm. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Ichino, N., and Schündeln, M.. 2012. “Deterring or Displacing Electoral Irregularities? Spillover Effects of Observers in a Randomized Field Experiment in Ghana.” Journal of Politics 74 (1): 292307.
Kelley, J. 2008. “Assessing the Complex Evolution of Norms: The Rise of International Election Monitoring.” International Organization 62 (2): 221–55.
Kelley, J. 2012. Monitoring Democracy: When International Election Observation Works and Why it Often Fails. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Klimek, P., Yegorov, Y., Hanel, R., and Thurner, S.. 2012. “Statistical Detection of Systematic Election Irregulatrities.” Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the United States of America 109 (41): 16469–73.
Lehoucq, F. 2003. “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 6 (1): 233–56.
Nisbet, E., Stoycheff, E., and Pearce, K.. 2012. “Internet use and Democratic Demands: A Multinational, Multilevel Model of Internet use and Citizen Attitudes about Democracy.” Journal of Communication 62 (2): 249–65.
Olken, B. 2007. “Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Economy 115 (2): 200–49.
Olken, B., and Pande, R.. 2013. Governance Review Paper J-PAL Governance Initiative MIT. (http://www.povertyactionlab.org/publication/j-pal-governance-initiative-review-paper), accessed August 25, 2015.
Pickard, G., Rahwan, I., Pan, W., Cebrian, M., Crane, R., Madan, A., and Pentland, A.. 2011. “Time-critical Social Mobilization.” Science 334 (6055): 509–12.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny, R. 1993. “Corruption.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 599617.
Simpser, A., and Donno, D.. 2012. “Can International Election Monitoring harm Governance?Journal of Politics 74 (2): 501–13.
Valenzuela, S. 2013. “Unpacking the use of Social Media for Protest behavior: The Roles of Information, Opinion Expression, and Activism.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (7): 920–42.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Callen supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (1.2 MB)
1.2 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed