Skip to main content
×
Home

Individual Preferences for FDI in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from China

  • Xiaojun Li (a1) and Ka Zeng (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) into developing countries such as India and China is often met with domestic backlash by the citizens of the host country, and backlash in the form of protests and other disruptive behavior has increased the salience of public opinion in FDI policy. As one of the first survey experiments assessing Chinese citizens’ attitudes toward FDI, this paper adopts a novel conjoint design to evaluate the impact, in the present project, of individual respondent characteristics and specific FDI features on respondents’ preferences. Importantly, we find that low-skilled respondents are not necessarily more likely to support labor-intensive FDI, a result that challenges the conventional wisdom that individuals in developing countries abundantly endowed with labor should be more likely to support low-skilled FDI. Instead, citizens are more concerned about FDI projects’ country of origin and impact on the local job market when forming their preferences.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Badkar Mamta. 2012. “Huge Protests Erupt in India Over Latest Economic Plan.” Business Insider, 20 September. http://www.businessinsider.com/indian-protests-fdi-wal-mart-fuel-subsidies-23-billion-2012-9.
Bechtel Michael M., and Scheve Kenneth F.. 2013. “Mass Support for Global Climate Agreements Depends on Institutional Design.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (34): 13763–8.
Dean Judith M., Lovely Mary E., and Wang Hua. 2009. “Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Weak Environmental Regulations? Evaluating the Evidence from China.” Journal of Development Economics 90 (1): 113.
Dunning John H. 1998. Explaining International Production. London: Unwin Hyman.
Dunning John H. 1993. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Easson Alex. 2001. “Tax Incentives for Foreign Direct Investment Part 1: Recent Trends and Countertrends.” Bulletin for International Taxation 55: 266–74.
Feenstra Robert C. and Hanson Gordon H.. 1997. “Foreign Direct Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico's Maquiladoras.” Journal of International Economics 42 (3–4): 371–93.
Griffith Rachel. 1999. “Using the ARD Establishment Level Data to Look at Foreign Ownership and Productivity in the United Kingdom.” Economic Journal 109 (June): 416–42.
Guisinger Alexandra. 2009. “Determining Trade Policy: Do Voters Hold Politicians Accountable?International Organization 63 (3): 533–57.
Hainmueller Jens, and Hopkins Daniel J.. 2014. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12138.
Hansen Kasper M., Olsen Asmus L., and Bech Mickael. 2014. “Cross-National Yardstick Comparisons: A Choice Experiment on a Forgotten Voter Heuristic.” Political Behavior. doi: 10.1007/s11109-014-9288-y.
Harms Philipp and Méon Pierre-Guillaume. 2014. “Good and Bad FDI: The Growth Effects of Greenfield Investment and Mergers and Acquisitions in Developing Countries.” CEB Working Paper No. 14/021.
Iida Keisuke. 2014. “Political Risks and Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia: A Case Study of ‘China-Plus-One’.” Korean Journal of International Studies 13 (2): 383410.
Jensen Nathan M. and Lindstädt René. 2012. “Globalization with Whom: Context-Dependent Foreign Direct Investment Preferences.” Working Paper.
Kelly David A., Rajan Ramkishen S., and Goh Gillian H. L.. 2006. Managing Globalization: Lessons from China and India. Singapore: World Scientific Press.
Li Xiaojun, Shi Weiyi, and Zhu Boliang. 2017. “The Face of Internet Recruitment: Evaluating the Labor Markets of Online Crowdsourcing Platforms in China.” 21st Century China Center Research Paper No. 2017-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002066.
Mansfield Edward D. and Mutz Diana C.. 2009. “Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety.” International Organization 63 (3): 425–57.
Naoi Megumi and Kume Ikuo. 2011. “Explaining Mass Support for Agricultural Protectionism: Evidence from a Survey Experiment During the Global Recession.” International Organization 65 (4): 771–95.
Orme B. 1998. Sample Size Issues for Conjoint Analysis Studies. Sequim: Sawtooth Software Technical Paper.
Pandya Sonal. 2010. “Labor Markets and the Demand for Foreign Direct Investment.” International Organization 64 (3): 389409.
Pandya Sonal. 2014. Trading Spaces: Foreign Direct Investment Regulation, 1970–2000. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Reilly James. 2013. Strong Society, Smart State: The Rise of Public Opinion in China's Japan Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rho Sungmin and Tomz Michael. 2017. “Why Don't Trade Preferences Reflect Economic Self-Interest?International Organization 71 (S1): S85–S108.
Spilker Gabriele, Bernauer Thomas, and Umaña Víctor. 2016. “Selecting Partner Countries for Preferential Trade Agreements. Experimental Evidence from Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Vietnam.” International Studies Quarterly 60 (4): 706–18.
Taylor Christopher T. 2000. “The Impact of Host Country Government Policy on US Multinational Investment Decisions.” World Economy 23 (5): 635–48.
Wang Miao and Sunny Wong M. C.. 2009. “What Drives Economic Growth? The Case of Cross-Border and Greenfield FDI Activities.” Kyklos 62 (2): 316–30.
Yang Daying. 2002. “Mirror for the Future or the History Card? Understanding the ‘History Problem’.” In Soderberg Mark (Ed.), Chinese-Japanese Relations in the Twenty-First Century: Complementarity and Conflict (pp. 1031). London: Routledge.
Zhu Boliang. 2011. “Individual Skill Endowments and Attitudes toward High/Low-Skill Intensive FDI: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of International Political Economy Society.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Li and Zeng supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (1.6 MB)
1.6 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 288 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 30th October 2017 - 13th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.