Skip to main content
×
Home

Just Don’t Call it a Tax! Framing in an Experiment on Voting and Redistribution

  • Jan Lorenz (a1), Fabian Paetzel (a2) and Markus Tepe (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Utilizing a simplified version of the Meltzer–Richard redistribution mechanism, we designed a laboratory experiment to test whether it matters if voters were asked to decide on a tax rate or a minimum income, leaving the redistribution mechanism itself unchanged. Framing the vote about redistribution as a decision about a minimal income increases the individually and ideally preferred level of redistribution. This effect outlives the groups’ deliberation processes and leads to the implementation of a higher level of redistribution.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alesina Alberto and Giuliano Paola. 2011. “Preferences for Redistribution.” In Handbook of Social Economics (pp. 93132), eds. Benhabib Jess, Bisin Alberto, and Jackson Matthew O.. North Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Barber Benjamin, Beramendi Pablo, and Wibbels Erik. 2013. “The Behavioral Foundations of Social Politics: Evidence from Surveys and a Laboratory Democracy.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (10): 11551189. doi: 10.1177/0010414012472467.
Camerer Colin. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Chong Dennis and Druckman James N.. 2007. “Framing Theory.” doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
Cubitt Robin P., Drouvelis Michalis, and Gächter Simon. 2011. “Framing and Free Riding: Emotional Responses and Punishment in Social Dilemma Games.” Experimental Economics 14 (2): 254272.
Downs Anthony. 1957. “An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy.” The Journal of Political Economy 65 (2): 135150.
Esarey Justin, Salmon Timothy C., and Barrilleaux Charles. 2012a. “Social Insurance and Income Redistribution in a Laboratory Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 685698. doi: 10.1177/1065912911411096.
Esarey Justin, Salmon Timothy C., and Barrilleaux Charles. 2012b. “What Motivates Political Preferences? Self-Interest, Ideology, and Fairness in a Laboratory Democracy.” Economic Inquiry 50 (3): 604624.
Fischbacher Urs. 2007. “z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics 10 (2): 171178.
Frohlich Norman and Oppenheimer Joe A.. 1990. “Choosing Justice in Experimental Democracies with Production.” American Political Science Review 84 (2): 461477.
Frohlich Norman and Oppenheimer Joe A.. 1992. Choosing Justice. An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Frohlich Norman, Oppenheimer Joe A., and Eavey Cheryl L.. 1987a. “Laboratory Results on Rawls’s Distributive Justice.” British Journal of Political Science 17 (1): 121.
Frohlich Norman, Oppenheimer Joe A., and Eavey Cheryl L.. 1987b. “Choices of Principles of Distributive Justice in Experimental Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 606636.
Greiner Ben. 2015. “Subject Pool Recruitment Procedures: Organizing Experiments with Orsee.” Journal of the Economic Science Association 1 (1): 114125. ISSN . doi: 10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4.
Harsanyi John C. 1955. “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility.” Journal of Political Economy 63 (4): 309321.
Höchtl Wolfgang, Sausgruber Rupert, and Tyran Jean-Robert. 2012. “Inequality Aversion and Voting on Redistribution.” European Economic Review 56 (7): 14061421.
Inglehart Ronald and Klingemann Hans-Dieter. 1976. “Party Identification, Ideological Preferences and the Left-Right Dimension Among Western Publics.” In Party Identification and Beyond. Representations of Voting and Party Competition, eds. Budge I., Crewe I., and Farlie D. (pp. 243273). London: John Wiley & Sons.
Kerschbamer Rudolf. 2015. The Geometry of Distributional Preferences and a Non-Parametric Identification Approach: The Equality Equivalence Test. European Economic Review 76 (C): 85103.
Kittel Bernhard, Paetzel Fabian, and Traub Stefan. 2015. “Competition, Income Distribution, and the Middle Class: An Experimental Study.” Journal of Applied Mathematics 501: ID 303912.
Konow James. 2003. “Which is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories.” Journal of Economic Literature 41 (4): 11881239.
Konow James. 2009. “Is Fairness in the Eye of the Beholder? An Impartial Spectator Analysis of Justice.” Social Choice and Welfare 33 (1): 101127.
Lorenz Jan, Paetzel Fabian, and Tepe Markus. 2015. “Experimental Data: Framing in an Experiment on Voting and Redistribution.” Harvard Dataverse, V3 [UNF:6:bnILA1zioGAF+wEFoffltQ==].
Meltzer Allan H. and Richard Scott F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914927.
Michelbach Philip A., Scott John T., Matland Richard E., and Bornstein Brian H.. 2003. “Doing Rawls Justice: An Experimental Study on Distribution Norms.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 523539.
Rawls John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Saito Kota. 2013. “Social Preferences Under Risk: Equality of Opportunity Versus Equality of Outcome.” The American Economic Review 103 (7): 30843101.
Sartori Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Seidl Christian and Traub Stefan. 2001. “Taxpayers’ Attitudes, Behavior, and Perception of Fairness.” Pacific Economic Review 6 (2): 255267.
Traub Stefan, Seidl Christian, and Schmidt Ulrich. 2009. “An Experimental Study on Individual Choice, Social welfare, and Social Preferences.” European Economic Review 53 (4): 385400.
Traub Stefan, Seidl Christian, Schmidt Ulrich, and Levati Maria Vittoria. 2005. “Friedman, Harsanyi, Rawls, Boulding–or Somebody Else? An Experimental Investigation of Distributive Justice.” Social Choice and Welfare 24 (2): 283309.
Willinger Marc and Ziegelmeyer Anthony. 1999. “Framing and Cooperation in Public Good Games: An Experiment with an Interior Solution.” Economics Letters 65 (3): 323328.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 18 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 135 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 8th November 2017 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.