Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Moving Beyond Measurement: Adapting Audit Studies to Test Bias-Reducing Interventions

  • Daniel M. Butler (a1) and Charles Crabtree (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

This paper discusses how audit studies can be adapted to test the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing discrimination. We conducted an adapted audit experiment to test whether making officials aware of bias could reduce levels of racial bias. While the limitations of our design make it difficult to assess where information alone can reduce bias, our study makes two important contributions. First, we replicate prior studies by showing that white, local elected officials are less responsive to black constituents. That local officials exhibit biased behavior is particularly worrisome, as local government is often the level that most directly affects citizens’ daily lives. Second, we provide several suggestions for future audit studies that draw from the strengths and weaknesses of our own design. We hope that they will help improve future work on identifying and reducing discrimination.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Moving Beyond Measurement: Adapting Audit Studies to Test Bias-Reducing Interventions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Moving Beyond Measurement: Adapting Audit Studies to Test Bias-Reducing Interventions
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Moving Beyond Measurement: Adapting Audit Studies to Test Bias-Reducing Interventions
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Adida Claire L., Laitin David D., and Valfort Marie-Anne. 2010. “Identifying Barriers to Muslim Integration in France.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (52): 384–90.
Bertrand Marianne and Mullainathan Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal: A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 9911013.
Burgess Diana, van Ryn Michelle, Dovidio John, and Saha Somnath. 2007. “Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22 (6): 882–7.
Butler Daniel M. 2014. Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Butler Daniel M. and Broockman David E.. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 463–77.
Costa Mia. 2016. “How Responsive are Political Elites? A Meta-Analysis of Experiments on Public Officials.” Working Paper.
Devine Patricia G. and Monteith Margo J.. 1999. “Automaticity and Control in Stereotyping.” In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, eds. Chaiken and Trope Y. (pp. 339360). New York: Guilford Press.
Dovidio John F., Kawakami Kerry and Gaertner Samuel L.. 2002Implicit and Explicit Prejudice and Interracial Interaction.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82 (1): 62.
Findley Michael and Nielson Daniel. 2015. “Obligated to Deceive? Aliases, Confederates, and the Common Rule in International Field Experiments.? In Ethics and Experiments: Problems and Solutions for Social Scientists and Policy Professionals, ed. Desposato Scott. New York: Routledge.
Gerber Alan S., Green Donald P., Kaplan Edward H., and Kern Holger L.. 2010. “Baseline, Placebo, and Treatment: Efficient Estimation for Three-Group Experiments.” Political Analysis 18 (3): 297315.
Gaddis S. Michael. 2014. “Discrimination in the Credential Society: An Audit Study of Race and College Selectivity in the Labor Market.” Social Forces 93 (4): 1451–79.
Griffin John D. and Newman Brian. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McClendon Gwyneth. 2016. “Race and Responsiveness: A Field Experiment with South African Politicians.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 3 (1): 6074.
Nickerson David W. 2005. “Scalable Protocols Offer Efficient Design for Field Experiments.” Political Analysis 13 (3): 233–52.
Pager Devah. 2007. “The Use of Field Experiments for Studies of Employment Discrimination: Contributions, Critiques, and Directions for the Future.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 609 (1): 104–33.
Pope Devin G., Price Joseph, and Wolfers Justin. 2013. “Awareness Reduces Racial Bias.” National Bureau of Economic Research No. w19765.
Rudman Laurie A., Ashmore Richard D., and Gary Melvin L.. 2001. “Unlearning” Automatic Biases: The Malleability of Implicit Prejudice and Stereotypes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (5): 856–68.
Schulman Kevin A., et al. 1999. “The Effect of Race and Sex on Physicians’ Recommendations for Cardiac Catheterization.” New England Journal of Medicine 340 (8): 618–26.
Sinclair Betsy, McConnell Margaret, and Green Donald P.. (2012). “Detecting Spillover Effects: Design and Analysis of Multilevel Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 1055–69.
Turner Margery A., Ross Stephen, Galster George C., and Yinger John. 2002. Discrimination in Metropolitan Housing Markets: National Results from Phase 1 of the Housing Discrimination Study (HDS) (No. 2002-16).
Vuolo Mike, Uggen Christopher, and Lageson Sarah. 2015. “Statistical Power in Experimental Audit Studies: Cautions and Calculations for Matched Tests with Nominal Outcomes.” Sociological Research & Methods. DOI: 10.1177/0049124115570066.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Butler and Crabtree supplementary material 1
Appendix

 PDF (606 KB)
606 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 77 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 394 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th September 2017 - 17th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.