Skip to main content Accessibility help

Studying Identities with Experiments: Weighing the Risk of Posttreatment Bias Against Priming Effects

  • Samara Klar (a1), Thomas Leeper (a2) and Joshua Robison (a3)


Scholars from across the social sciences argue that identities – such as race, ethnicity, and gender – are highly influential over individuals’ attitudes, actions, and evaluations. Experiments are becoming particularly integral for allowing identity scholars to explain how these social attachments shape our political behavior. In this letter, we draw attention to how identity scholars should approach the common practice of assessing moderators, measuring control variables, and detecting effect heterogeneity using covariates. Special care must be taken when deciding where to place measures of demographic covariates in identity-related experiments, as these cases pose unique challenges from how scholars traditionally approach experimental design. We argue in this letter that identity scholars, particularly those whose subjects identify as women or minorities, are often right to measure covariates of interest posttreatment.



Hide All

Citation of data: The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at: doi:10.1017/XPS.2019.26.



Hide All
Abrams, Dominic, Wetherell, Margaret, Cochrane, Sandra, Hogg, Michael A., and Turner, John C.. 1990. Know What to Think by Knowing Who You Are: Self-Categorization and the Nature of Norm Formation, Conformity and Group Polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology 29(2): 97119.
Acharya, Avidit, Blackwell, Matthew, and Sen, Maya. 2016. Explaining causal findings without bias: Detecting and assessing direct effects. American Political Science Review 110(3): 512–29.
Antman, Francisca and Duncan, Brian. 2015. Incentives to identify: Racial identity in the age of affirmative action. Review of Economics and Statistics 97(3): 710–3.
Benjamin, Daniel J., Choi, James C. and Strickland, A. Joshua. 2010. Social identity and preferences. American Economic Review 100(2): 1913–28.
Blackwell, Matthew. 2013. A framework for dynamic causal inference in political science. American Journal of Political Science 57(2): 504–19.
Branscombe, Nyla R, Ellemers, Naomi, Spears, Russell, and Doosje, Bertjan. 1999. The Context and Content of Social Identity Threat. In Social Identity, eds. Ellemers, N., Spears, R. and Doosje, B. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 3558.
Craig, Maureen A., and Richeson, Jennifer A.. 2014. On the precipice of a “majority-minority” America: Perceived status threat from the racial demographic shift affects white Americans’ political ideology. Psychological Science 25(6): 1189–97.
Druckman, James N., and Chong, Dennis. 2010. Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review 104(4): 663–80.
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. Yale, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Harrison, Brian F., and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2016. More than a game: Football fans and marriage equality. PS: Political Science & Politics 49(4): 782–7.
Jackson, Melinda. 2011. Priming the sleeping giant: The dynamics of latino political identity and vote choice. Political Psychology 32(4): 691716.
Klar, Samara. 2013. The influence of competing identity primes on political preferences. The Journal of Politics 75(4): 1108–24.
Klar, Samara, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2016. Independent Politics: How American Disdain for Parties Leads to Political Inaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lupu, Noam. 2013. Party brands and partisanship: Theory with evidence from a survey experiment in Argentina. American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 4964.
McClendon, Gwyneth. 2014. Social esteem and participation in contentious politics: A field experiments at an LGBT pride rally. American Journal of Political Science 58(2): 279–90.
Mendelberg, Tali. 2008. Racial priming revived. Perspectives on Politics 6(1): 109–23.
Montgomery, Jacob M., Nyhan, Brendan, and Torres, Michelle. 2018. How condition on posttreatment variables can ruin your experiment and what to do about it. American Journal of Political Science 62(3): 760–75.
Morris, Michael W., Carranza, Erica, and Fox, Craig R.. 2008. Mistaken Identity: Activating Conservative Political Identities Induces Conservative Financial Decisions. Psychological Science 19(11): 1154–60.
Mummolo, Jonathan. 2016. News from the other side: How topic relevance limits the prevalence of partisan selective exposure. The Journal of Politics 78(3): 763–73.
Mutz, Diana, Pemantle, Robin, and Pham, Philip. 2019. The Perils of balance testing in experimental design: Messy analyses of clean data. The American Statistician 73(1): 3242.
Pérez, Efrén O., Andrew, M. Engelhardt, and Deichert, Maggie. 2019. E Pluribus Unum? How ethnic and national identity motivate reactions to a political ideal. The Journal of Politics. 81(4). doi: 10.1086/704596.
Sniderman, Paul M., Hagendoorn, Louk, and Prior, Markus. 2004. Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review 98(1): 3549.
Transue, John E. 2007. Identity salience, identity acceptance, and racial policy attitudes: American national identity as a uniting force. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 7891.
Weiner, Marc D. 2015. A Natural experiment: Inadvertent priming of party identification in a split-sample survey. Survey Practice 8(6): 17.
Williams, Monnica T., Turkheimer, Eric, Magee, Emily, and Guterbock, Thomas. 2008. The effects of race and racial priming on self-report of contamination anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences 44(3): 746–57.


Studying Identities with Experiments: Weighing the Risk of Posttreatment Bias Against Priming Effects

  • Samara Klar (a1), Thomas Leeper (a2) and Joshua Robison (a3)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed