Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Threat and Information Acquisition: Evidence from an Eight Country Study

  • Jennifer L. Merolla (a1) and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister (a2)
Abstract

We assess individuals’ responses to news about threat, compared to news about positive indicators of well-being, using data from nine experiments conducted across eight countries. The general proposition is that exposure to news about threat increases tendencies to “tune in” to information, compared to those presented with news about better times. The evidence strongly supports this expectation: without exception, the average respondent recalls and seeks more information about terrorist threat than good times. Further, this pattern of results generalizes to other threats. The study thematically and geographically extends research on negative information and political learning. It also has broader implications: absorbing newsworthy information is foundational to the types of attitudes citizens express and the extent to which, and how, they engage in the world around them.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

Materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at doi:10.7910/DVN/YJOPLH. Support for this project was granted from the National Science Foundation (Award nos. 0850824 and 0851136).

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Albertson, Bethany and Gadarian, Shana K.. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baumeister, Roy F., Bratslavsky, Ellen, and Finkenauer, Catrin. 2001. “Bad is Stronger than Good.” Review of General Psychology 5 (4): 323–70.
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49: 388405.
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bradley, Samuel D., Angelini, James R., and Lee, Sungkyoung. 2007. “Psychophysiological and Memory Effects of Negative Political Ads: Aversive, Arousing, and Well Remembered.” Journal of Advertising 36 (4): 115–27.
Carver, Charles S. 2004. “Negative Affects Deriving from the Behavioral Approach System.” Emotion 4 (1):322.
Fiske, Susan T. 1980. “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 889906.
Freedman, Paul, Franz, Michael, and Goldstein, Kenneth. 2004. “Campaign Advertising and Democratic Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 723–41.
Fridkin, Kim Leslie and Kenney, Patrick J.. 2008. “The Dimensions of Negative Messages.” American Politics Research 36: 694723.
Gadarian, Shana Kushner. 2010. “The Politics of Threat: How Terrorism News Shapes Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Journal of Politics 72: 469–83.
Gadarian, Shana Kushner and Albertson, Bethany. 2014. “Anxiety, Immigration, and the Search for Information.” Political Psychology 35 (2): 133–64.
Geer, John G. 2006. In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie, Harmon-Jones, Cindy, Abramson, Lyn, and Peterson, Carly K.. 2009. “PANAS Positive Activation is Associated with Anger.” Emotion 9 (2): 183–96.
Helson, Harry. 1964. Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior. New York: Harper.
Hoffman, Aaron M., Kowal, Chris, and Kaire de Francisco, José. 2013. “Terrorism Coverage and the Fear of Terrorism.” Presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, and Cassese, Erin. 2007. “On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger.” In The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior, eds. Russell Neuman, W., Marcus, George E., Crigler, Ann, and MacKuen, Michael. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press.
Ito, Tiffany A., Larsen, Jeff T., Kyle Smith, N., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1998. “Negative Information Weighs More Heavily on the Brain: The Negativity Bias in Evaluative Categorizations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75 (4): 887900.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1984. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist 39: 341–50.
Lau, Richard R. 1982. “Negativity in Political Perception.” Political Behavior 4 (4): 353–77.
Lau, Richard R. 1985. “Two Explanations for Negativity Effects in Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 29: 119–38.
Lau, Richard R., Sigelman, Lee, and Rovner, Ivy B.. 2007. “The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1176–209.
Lerner, Jennifer S. and Keltner, Dacher. 2000. “Beyond Valence: Toward a Model of Emotion-Specific Influences on Judgment and Choice.” Cognition and Emotion 14 (4): 473–93.
MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, Keele, Luke, and Marcus, George E.. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 440–58.
MacLeod, Colin and Mathews, Andrew. 1988. “Anxiety and the Allocation of Attention to Threat.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40 (4): 653–70.
Marcus, George E. and MacKuen, Michael B.. 1993. “Anxiety, Enthusiasm and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns.” American Political Science Review 87: 672–85.
Marcus, George E. and MacKuen, Michael B.. 2001. “Emotions and Politics: The Dynamic Functions of Emotionality.” In Citizens and Politics: Perspectives from Political Psychology, ed. Kuklinski, James. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, George E., MacKuen, Michael, Wolak, Jennifer, and Keele, Luke. 2006. “The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion.” In Feeling Politics: Emotion in Political Information Processing, ed. Redlawsk, David. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Marcus, George E., Russell Neuman, W., and MacKuen, Michael B.. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merolla, Jennifer L. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2009. Democracy at Risk: How Terrorist Threats Affect the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merolla, Jennifer L. and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2018. “Replication Data for: Threat and Information Acquisition from an Eight Country Study.” doi: 10.7910/DVN/YJOPLH.
Merolla, Jennifer L., Montalvo, Daniel, Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Zizumbo-Colunga, Daniel. 2011. “Terrorism and Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean.” Presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL, March 31–April 3.
Nadeau, Richard, Niemi, Richard G., and Amato, Timothy. 1995. “Emotions, Issue Importance, and Political Learning.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 558–74.
Shadish, William R., Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 2002. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Sherif, M. and Sherif, C. W.. 1967. “Attitudes as the Individual's Own Categories: The Social Judgment Approach to Attitude Change. In Attitude, Ego Involvement, and Change, eds. Sherif, C. W. and Sherif, M.. New York: Wiley, pp. 105–39.
Slovic, Paul. 1969. “Differential Effects of Real versus Hypothetical Payoffs on Choices among Gambles.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3): 434–37.
Tiedens, Larissa Z. and Linton, Susan. 2001. “Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81: 973–88.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J., and Davis, Anne K.. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29 (2): 247–73.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Merolla and Zechmeister supplementary material
Merolla and Zechmeister supplementary material 1

 Word (93 KB)
93 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Merolla and Zechmeister Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed