Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Voters Don't Care Much About Incumbency

  • Adam R. Brown (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

US House incumbents enjoy profound electoral advantages, yet existing research has not asked whether individual voters actually prefer incumbents over newcomers, other things being equal. Instead, existing research has focused on showing that other things are not equal by emphasizing the structural advantages that incumbents enjoy. Political scientists, economists, and pundits have frequently speculated that voters either reward or punish incumbency, even when structural advantages are ignored. A randomized survey experiment administered in two waves to 1,976 respondents suggests that voters respond only minimally—if at all—to incumbency status once the structural advantages are held constant. Voters do not exhibit a strong general preference either for or against incumbency.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. I. Abramowitz 1975. Name Familiarity, Reputation, and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election. Western Political Quarterly 28 (December): 668–84.

S. Ansolabehere , J. M. Snyder Jr., and C. Stewart III 2000. Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage. American Journal of Political Science 44 (January): 1734.

S. Ashworth and E. Bueno de Mesquita 2008. Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage. Journal of Politics 70 (October): 1006–25.

A. J. Berinsky , G. A. Huber , and G. S. Lenz 2012. Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20: 351–68.

A. Campbell , and W. E. Miller 1957. The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting. American Political Science Review 51 (June): 293312.

J. L. Carson 2005. Strategy, Selection, and Candidate Competition in US House and Senate Elections. Journal of Politics 67 (February): 128.

J. L. Carson , J. A. Jenkins , D. W. Rohde , and M. A. Souva 2001. The Impact of National Tides and District-Level Effects on Electoral Outcomes: The US Congressional Elections of 1862. American Journal of Political Science 45 (October): 887–98.

A. D. Cover 1977. One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections. American Journal of Political Science 21 (September): 523–41.

G. W. Cox , and J. N. Katz 1996. Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections Grow? American Journal of Political Science 40 (May): 478–97.

E. Fatas , T. Neugebauer , and P. Tamborero 2007. How Politicians Make Decisions: A Political Choice Experiment. Journal of Economics 92 (2): 167–96.

J. A. Ferejohn 1977. On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 71 (March): 166–76.

J. A. Ferejohn 1986. Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice 50 (Fall): 525.

M. P. Fiorina 1977. The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It. American Political Science Review 71 (March): 177–81.

D. Klein , and L. Baum 2001. Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Elections. Political Research Quarterly 54 (December): 709–28.

T.-min Lin , and M. Guillen 1999. The Rising Hazards of Party Incumbency: A Discrete Renewal Analysis. Political Analysis 7: 3157.

C. McCurly , and J. J. Mondak 1995. Inspected by # 1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents' Competence and Integrity in US House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 39 (November): 864–85.

J. J. Mondak 1995a. Competence, Integrity, and Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents. Journal of Politics 57 (November): 1043–69.

J. J. Mondak 1995b. Elections as Filters: Term Limits and the Composition of the US House. Political Research Quarterly 48 (December): 701–27.

G. R. Parker , and R. H. Davidson 1979. Why Do Americans Love Their Congressmen so Much More than Their Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 (February): 5361.

W. Samuelson , and R. Zeckhauser 1988. Status Quo Bias in Decision-Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1): 759.

W. J. Stone , S. L. Maisel , and C. D. Maestas 2004. Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence. American Journal of Political Science 48 (July): 479–95.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Brown Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (194 KB)
194 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Brown supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (194 KB)
194 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 42 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 140 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 29th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.