Skip to main content
×
Home

Voters Don't Care Much About Incumbency

  • Adam R. Brown (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

US House incumbents enjoy profound electoral advantages, yet existing research has not asked whether individual voters actually prefer incumbents over newcomers, other things being equal. Instead, existing research has focused on showing that other things are not equal by emphasizing the structural advantages that incumbents enjoy. Political scientists, economists, and pundits have frequently speculated that voters either reward or punish incumbency, even when structural advantages are ignored. A randomized survey experiment administered in two waves to 1,976 respondents suggests that voters respond only minimally—if at all—to incumbency status once the structural advantages are held constant. Voters do not exhibit a strong general preference either for or against incumbency.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abramowitz A. I. 1975. Name Familiarity, Reputation, and the Incumbency Effect in a Congressional Election. Western Political Quarterly 28 (December): 668–84.
Ansolabehere S., Snyder J. M. Jr., and Stewart C. III 2000. Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage. American Journal of Political Science 44 (January): 1734.
Ashworth S. and Bueno de Mesquita E. 2008. Electoral Selection, Strategic Challenger Entry, and the Incumbency Advantage. Journal of Politics 70 (October): 1006–25.
Berinsky A. J., Huber G. A., and Lenz G. S. 2012. Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis 20: 351–68.
Campbell A., Converse P. E., Miller W. E., and Stokes D. E. 1960. The American Voter. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Campbell A., and Miller W. E. 1957. The Motivational Basis of Straight and Split Ticket Voting. American Political Science Review 51 (June): 293312.
Carson J. L. 2005. Strategy, Selection, and Candidate Competition in US House and Senate Elections. Journal of Politics 67 (February): 128.
Carson J. L., Jenkins J. A., Rohde D. W., and Souva M. A. 2001. The Impact of National Tides and District-Level Effects on Electoral Outcomes: The US Congressional Elections of 1862. American Journal of Political Science 45 (October): 887–98.
Cho W. K. T., and Gimpel J. G. 2007. Prospecting for (Campaign) Gold. American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 255–68.
Cover A. D. 1977. One Good Term Deserves Another: The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections. American Journal of Political Science 21 (September): 523–41.
Cox G. W., and Katz J. N. 1996. Why Did the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections Grow? American Journal of Political Science 40 (May): 478–97.
Fatas E., Neugebauer T., and Tamborero P. 2007. How Politicians Make Decisions: A Political Choice Experiment. Journal of Economics 92 (2): 167–96.
Fenno R. F. Jr. 1975. If, as Ralph Nader Says, Congress If the Broken Branch, How Come We Love Our Congressmen so Much? In Congress in Change: Evolution and Reform eds. Ornstein N. J.. New York, NY: Praeger, 277–87.
Ferejohn J. A. 1977. On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 71 (March): 166–76.
Ferejohn J. A. 1986. Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control. Public Choice 50 (Fall): 525.
Fiorina M. P. 1977. The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It. American Political Science Review 71 (March): 177–81.
Francia P. L., Green J. C., Herrnson P. S., Powell L. W., and Wilcox C. 2003. The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Herrnson P. S. 2008. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington DC: CQ Press.
Jacobson G. C. 2013. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Jacobson G. C., and Kernell S. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kam C. D., and Zechmeister E. J. 2013. Name Recognition and Candidate Support. American Journal of Political Science 57 (October): 971–86.
Klein D., and Baum L. 2001. Ballot Information and Voting Decisions in Judicial Elections. Political Research Quarterly 54 (December): 709–28.
Lin T.-min, and Guillen M. 1999. The Rising Hazards of Party Incumbency: A Discrete Renewal Analysis. Political Analysis 7: 3157.
Lupia A., and McCubbins M. D. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mayhew D. R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McCurly C., and Mondak J. J. 1995. Inspected by # 1184063113: The Influence of Incumbents' Competence and Integrity in US House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 39 (November): 864–85.
Mondak J. J. 1995a. Competence, Integrity, and Electoral Success of Congressional Incumbents. Journal of Politics 57 (November): 1043–69.
Mondak J. J. 1995b. Elections as Filters: Term Limits and the Composition of the US House. Political Research Quarterly 48 (December): 701–27.
Mutz D. C. 2011. Population-Based Survey Experiments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Nelson C. J. 1978. The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964–1974. Political Science Quarterly 4 (Winter): 665–78.
Parker G. R., and Davidson R. H. 1979. Why Do Americans Love Their Congressmen so Much More than Their Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 (February): 5361.
Samuelson W., and Zeckhauser R. 1988. Status Quo Bias in Decision-Making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1 (1): 759.
Stone W. J., Maisel S. L., and Maestas C. D. 2004. Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence. American Journal of Political Science 48 (July): 479–95.
Zaller J. 1998. Politicians As Prize Fighters: Electoral Selection and Incumbency Advantage. In Party Politics and Politicians ed. Geer J.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 125–85.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
  • ISSN: 2052-2630
  • EISSN: 2052-2649
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-experimental-political-science
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Brown Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (194 KB)
194 KB
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Brown supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (194 KB)
194 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 55 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 212 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.