Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-v4w92 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T09:26:06.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Chance-Constrained Approach to Capital Budgeting with Portfolio Type Payback and Liquidity Constraints and Horizon Posture Controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

R. Byrne ,
A. Charnes ,
W. W. Cooper  and
K. Kortanek
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This is an exploratory paper. In particular, it consists of explorations conducted around some of the possibilities that might be offered for capital budgeting via recently developed methods, e.g., chance-constrained programming, linear programming under uncertainty, etc.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 1967 , pp. 339 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Baumol, William J., Economic Theory and Operations Analysis (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall), 1961.Google Scholar
[2]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., Management Models and Industrial Applications of Linear Programming (New York: John Wiley & Sons), 1961.Google Scholar
[3]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., “Chance-Constrained Programming,” Management Science, October 1959, pp. 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., “Elements of a Strategy for Making Models in Linear Programming,” Systems Engineering Handbook, Machol, R. et al. , eds. (New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.), 1965.Google Scholar
[5]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. “Deterministic Equivalents for Optimizing and Satisficing Under Chance Constraints,” Operations Research, Vol. II, 1963, pp. 18–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. “Chance Constraints and Normal Deviates” Journal of The American Statistical Association, March 1962, pp. 134–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W. and Miller, M., “Application of Linear Programming to Financial Budgeting and the Costing of Funds,” Journal of Business, January 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W.DeVoe, J. K. and Learner, D. B., “DEMON: Decision-Mapping Via Optimum Go-No-Go Networks,” Management Science, Vol. 12, No. 11, July 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper, “DEMON, Mark II: An Extremal Equations Approach to New Products Marketing,” Management Science, (submitted).Google Scholar
[10]Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., and Thompson, G. L., “Constrained Generalized Medians and Hypermedians as Deterministic Equivalents for Two-Stage Linear Programs Under Uncertainty,” Management Science, Vol. 12, No. 1, September 1965, pp. 83–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Charnes, A., and Kirby, M., “Optimal Decision Rules for the E-Model of Chance-Constrained Programming,” Cahiers du Centred'Etudes de Recherche Operationelle, January 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Charnes, A., and Stedry, A., “A Chance-Constrained Model for Real- Time Control in Research and Development Management,” Management Science Series B, April 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Charnes, A., and Thore, Sten, “Planning for Liquidity in Savings and Loan Associations,” Journal of Finance, Vol. XXI, No. 4, December 1966, pp. 649–674.Google Scholar
[13a] Cooper, W. W., “The Theory of the Firm: Some Suggestions for Revision,” American Economic Review XXXIX, 6, December 1949.Google Scholar
[14]Dantzig, G. B., “Linear Programming Under Uncertainty,” Management Science, Vol. 1, 1955, pp. 197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Fiacco, A., and McCormick, G., “The Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Technique for Non-Linear Programming, a Primal-Dual Method,” Management Science, Vol. 10, 1964, pp. 360–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Hillier, F. H., “Chance Constrained Programming with 0–:1 or Bounded Decision Variables, Technical Report No. 92, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, August 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Hillier, F. H., “The Evaluation of Risky Interrelated Investments,” Revised Version, Stanford University, August 26, 1966. TIMS-ONR Award Winner, 1965, for best paper on Capital Budgeting of Interrelated Projects.Google Scholar
[18]Istvan, Donald F., Capital Expenditure Decisions, Bureau of Business Research, Graduate School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, 1961.Google Scholar
[19]Kortanek, K., and Soden, J. V., “On the Charnes-Kirby Optimality Theorem for the Conditional Chance-Constrained E-Model,” Cahiers du Centre d'Etudes de Recherche Operationelle (forthcoming).Google Scholar
[20]Miller, Bruce M. and Wagner, Harvey M., “Chance Constrained Programming with Joint Constraints,” Operations Research. Vol. 13, 1965, pp. 930–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Miller, J. H., “A Glimpse at Calculating and Using Return on Investment,” N.A.A. Bulletin. June 1960, pp. 71–75.Google Scholar
[22]Naslund, B., “Decisions Under Risk,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Institute of Technology, 1964.Google Scholar
[23]Naslund, B. “A Model of Capital Budgeting Under Risk,” Journal of Business, Vol. XXXIX, No. 2, April 1966, pp. 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Naslund, B. and Whinston, A., “A Model of Multi-Period Investment under Uncertainty,” Management Science. January 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[25]Symonds, G. H., “Deterministic Solutions for a Class of Chance Constrained Programming Problems,” Operations Research. Vol. 15, No. 3, May–June 1967, pp. 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26]Terborgh, George A., Dynamic Equipment Policy (New York: McGraw-Hill), 1949.Google Scholar
[27]Weingartner, H. M., Mathematical Programming and the Analysis of Capital Budgeting Problems (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall), 1963.Google Scholar
[28]Weingartner, H. M., “Capital Budgeting of Interrelated Projects: Survey and Synthesis,” Management Science, Vol. 12, No. 7, March 1966, pp. 485–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar