Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-45s75 Total loading time: 0.285 Render date: 2021-12-04T12:31:04.484Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Life-Cycle Asset Allocation with Ambiguity Aversion and Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2018

Abstract

Ambiguity and learning about the equity premium can simultaneously explain the low fraction of financial wealth allocated to stocks over the life cycle and the stock market participation puzzle. Individuals are ambiguous about the size of the equity premium and are averse to this ambiguity, resulting in lower stock allocations over the life cycle, consistent with the data. As agents get older, they learn about the equity premium and increase their allocation to stocks. Furthermore, I find that ambiguity leads to underdiversification, home bias, lower Sharpe ratios, and higher savings. Similar results cannot be obtained by assuming higher risk aversion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I thank Johannes Binswanger, Stephen Brown (the editor), Laurent Calvet (the referee), Katie Carman, Meltem Daysal, Joost Driessen, Thijs van der Heijden, Luigi Iovino, Frank de Jong, Ralph Koijen, Bertrand Melenberg, Olivia Mitchell, Theo Nijman, Paolo Porchia, Lisanne Sanders, Kent Smetters, Peter Snoeren, Arthur van Soest, Stefan Trautmann, Raman Uppal, Bas Werker, and seminar participants at the 2012 American Economic Association, BI Norwegian School of Management, Bocconi University, Catolica Lisbon, Copenhagen Business School, Erasmus University, IE University, Maastricht University, Melbourne University, Stockholm School of Economics, Tilburg Institute for Behavioral Economics Research conference, Tilburg Center of Finance conference, Tilburg University, University of Geneva, and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam for helpful comments and suggestions. Part of this research was conducted while I was visiting the University of Pennsylvania, and I am grateful for their hospitality. I acknowledge financial support by All Pensions Group.

References

Benzoni, L.; Collin-Dufresne, P.; and Goldstein, R.. “Portfolio Choice over the Life-Cycle When the Stock and Labor Market Are Cointegrated.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 21232167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, P.; Garlappi, L.; Uppal, R.; and Wang, T.. “Keynes Meets Markowitz: The Tradeoff between Familiarity and Diversification.” Management Science, 58 (2012), 253272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandt, M.; Goyal, A.; Santa-Clara, P.; and Stroud, J.. “A Simulation Approach to Dynamic Portfolio Choice with an Application to Learning About Return Predictability.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 831873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branger, N.; Larsen, L. S.; and Munk, C.. “Robust Portfolio Choice with Ambiguity and Learning About Return Predictability.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 37 (2013), 13971411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M.The Role of Learning in Dynamic Portfolio Decisions.” European Finance Review, 1 (1998), 295306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvet, L. E.; Campbell, J. Y.; and Sodini, P.. “Down or Out: Assessing the Welfare Costs of Household Investment Mistakes.” Journal of Political Economy, 115 (2007), 707747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvet, L. E.; Campbell, J. Y.; and Sodini, P.. “Measuring the Financial Sophistication of Households.” American Economic Review, 99 (2009), 393398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campanale, C.Learning, Ambiguity, and Life-Cycle Portfolio Allocation.” Review of Economic Dynamics, 14 (2011), 339367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, H.; Wang, T.; and Zhang, H.. “Model Uncertainty, Limited Market Participation, and Asset Prices.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 12191251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, C.The Method of Endogenous Gridpoints for Solving Dynamic Stochastic Optimization Problems.” Economics Letters, 91 (2006), 312320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chateauneuf, A.; Eichberger, J.; and Grant, S.. “Choice under Uncertainty with the Best and Worst in Mind: Neo-Additive Capacities.” Journal of Economic Theory, 137 (2007), 538567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocco, J.; Gomes, F.; and Maenhout, P.. “Consumption and Portfolio Choice over the Life Cycle.” Review of Financial Studies, 18 (2005), 491533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cvitanic, J.; Lazrak, A.; Martellini, L.; and Zapatero, F.. “Dynamic Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty and the Economic Value of Analysts’ Recommendations.” Review of Financial Studies, 19 (2006), 11131156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimmock, S.; Kouwenberg, R.; Mitchell, O.; and Peijnenburg, K.. “Estimating Ambiguity Preferences and Perceptions in Multiple Prior Models: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 51 (2015), 219244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimmock, S.; Kouwenberg, R.; Mitchell, O.; and Peijnenburg, K.. “Ambiguity Aversion and Household Portfolio Choice Puzzles: Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 119 (2016), 559577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dow, J.; Ribeiro, S.; and Werlang, C.. “Uncertainty Aversion, Risk Aversion, and the Optimal Choice of Portfolio.” Econometrica, 60 (1992), 197204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dynan, K. E.; Skinner, J.; and Zeldes, S. P.. “Do the Rich Save More?Journal of Political Economy, 112 (2004), 397444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easley, D., and O’Hara, M.. “Ambiguity and Nonparticipation: The Role of Regulation.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 18171843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, D.Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 (1961), 643669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L.; Noor, J.; and Sandroni, A.. “Non-Bayesian Learning.” B. E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 10 (2010), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L., and Schneider, M.. “Recursive Multiple-Priors.” Journal of Economic Theory, 113 (2003), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L., and Schneider, M.. “Learning under Ambiguity.” Review of Economic Studies, 74 (2007), 12751303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, L., and Schneider, M.. “Ambiguity and Asset Markets.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2 (2010), 315346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garlappi, L.; Uppal, R.; and Wang, T.. “Portfolio Selection with Parameter and Model Uncertainty: A Multi-Prior Approach.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 4181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennotte, G.Optimal Portfolio Choice under Incomplete Information.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1986), 733746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghirardato, P.; Maccheroni, F.; and Marinacci, M.. “Differentiating Ambiguity and Ambiguity Attitude.” Journal of Economic Theory, 118 (2004), 133173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilboa, I., and Schmeidler, D.. “Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior.” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18 (1989), 141153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollier, C.Portfolio Choices and Asset Prices: The Comparative Statics of Ambiguity Aversion.” Review of Economic Studies, 78 (2011), 13291344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, F., and Michaelides, A.. “Optimal Life-Cycle Asset Allocation: Understanding the Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 869904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidolin, M., and Liu, H.. “Ambiguity Aversion and Underdiversification.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 51 (2016), 12971323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guidolin, M., and Rinaldi, F.. “Ambiguity in Asset Pricing and Portfolio Choice: A Review of the Literature.” Theory and Decision, 74 (2013), 183217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanany, E., and Klibanoff, P.. “Updating Ambiguity Averse Preferences.” B. E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, 9 (2009), 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, J., and Lucas, D.. “Portfolio Choice in the Presence of Background Risk.” Economic Journal, 110 (2000), 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, R., and Zhou, G.. “Optimal Portfolio Choice with Parameter Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42 (2007), 621656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klibanoff, P.; Marinacci, M.; and Mukerji, S.. “A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity.” Econometrica, 73 (2005), 18491892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston, MA: Hart, Schaffner, and Marx; Houghton Mifflin (1921).Google Scholar
Koijen, R.; Nijman, T.; and Werker, B.. “When Can Life Cycle Investors Benefit from Time-Varying Bond Risk Premia?Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 741780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leippold, M.; Trojani, F.; and Vanini, P.. “Learning and Asset Prices under Ambiguous Information.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 25652597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H.Dynamic Portfolio Choice under Ambiguity and Regime Switching Mean Returns.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35 (2011), 623640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundtofte, F.Expected Life-Time Utility and Hedging Demands in a Partially Observable Economy.” European Economic Review, 52 (2008), 10721096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmendier, U., and Nagel, S.. “Depression Babies: Do Macroeconomic Experiences Affect Risk Taking?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126 (2011), 373416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R.Lifetime Portfolio Selection under Uncertainty: The Continuous-Time Case.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 51 (1969), 247257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miao, J.Ambiguity, Risk and Portfolio Choice under Incomplete Information.” Annals of Economics and Finance, 10 (2009), 257279.Google Scholar
Pastor, L.Portfolio Selection and Asset Pricing Models.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 179223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, L., and Veronesi, P.. “Learning in Financial Markets.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 1 (2009), 361381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polkovnichenko, V.Life-Cycle Portfolio Choice with Additive Habit Formation Preferences and Uninsurable Labor Income Risk.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 83124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Rooij, M.; Lusardi, A.; and Alessie, R.. “Financial Literacy and Stock Market Participation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 101 (2011), 449472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.Lifetime Portfolio Selection by Dynamic Stochastic Programming.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 51 (1969), 239246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, M.; Kocher, M.; Glätzle-Retzler, D.; and Trautmann, S. T.. “Impatience and Uncertainty: Experimental Decisions Predict Adolescents’ Field Behavior.” American Economic Review, 103 (2013), 510531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tu, J., and Zhou, G.. “Incorporating Economic Objectives into Bayesian Priors: Portfolio Choice under Parameter Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45 (2010), 959986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viceira, L.Optimal Portfolio Choice for Long-Horizon Investors with Non-Tradable Labor Income.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 433470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vissing-Jørgensen, A.“Towards an Explanation of Household Portfolio Choice Heterogeneity: Nonfinancial Income and Participation Cost Structures.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 8884 (2002).Google Scholar
Xia, Y.Learning About Predictability: The Effects of Parameter Uncertainty on Dynamic Asset Allocation.” Journal of Finance, 56 (2001), 205246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Life-Cycle Asset Allocation with Ambiguity Aversion and Learning
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Life-Cycle Asset Allocation with Ambiguity Aversion and Learning
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Life-Cycle Asset Allocation with Ambiguity Aversion and Learning
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *