Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-qdp55 Total loading time: 0.236 Render date: 2021-12-05T12:38:33.317Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Real-Option Valuation in Multiple Dimensions Using Poisson Optional Stopping Times

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2019

Abstract

We provide a new framework for valuing multidimensional real options where opportunities to exercise the option are generated by an exogenous Poisson process, which can be viewed as a liquidity constraint on decision times. This approach, which we call the Poisson optional stopping times (POST) method, finds the value function as a monotone sequence of lower bounds. In a case study, we demonstrate that the frequently used quasi-analytic method yields a suboptimal policy and an inaccurate value function. The proposed method is demonstrably correct, straightforward to implement, reliable in computation, and broadly applicable in analyzing multidimensional option-valuation problems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank two anonymous referees, Jan van Casteren, Dick van Dijk, Øystein Gjerde, David Mauer (a referee), and Coen Teulings for helpful comments. We also thank Hendrik Bessembinder (the editor) for his helpful guidance.

References

Abel, A. B., and Eberly, J. C.. “Optimal Investment with Costly Reversibility.” Review of Economic Studies, 63 (1996), 581593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramovitz, M., and Stegun, I.. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables, Vol. 55, 10th ed. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards (1972).Google Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “Reciprocal Energy-Switching Options.” Journal of Energy Markets, 4, 1 (2011a), 91120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “Renewing Assets with Uncertain Revenues and Operating Costs.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2011b), 785813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “Deterministic Models for Premature and Postponed Replacement.” Omega, 41 (2013a), 10081019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “The Effect of Tax Depreciation on the Stochastic Replacement Policy.” European Journal of Operational Research, 229 (2013b), 155164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “Stochastic Equipment Capital Budgeting with Technological Progress.” European Financial Management, 20 (2014), 10311049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “The Effects of an Uncertain Abandonment Value on the Investment Decision.” European Journal of Finance, 23 (2017a), 10831106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “Replacement Decisions with Multiple Stochastic Values and Depreciation.” European Journal of Operational Research, 257 (2017b), 174184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adkins, R., and Paxson, D.. “Sequential Investments with Stage-Specific Risks and Drifts.” European Journal of Finance, 23 (2017c), 11501175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlberg, J., and Nilson, E.. “Convergence Properties of the Spline Fit.” Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11 (1963), 95104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, L., and Broadie, M.. “Primal-Dual Simulation Algorithm for Pricing Multidimensional American Options.” Management Science, 50 (2004), 12221234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armada, M. J. R.; Pereira, P. J.; and Rodrigues, A.. “Optimal Investment with Two-Factor Uncertainty.” Mathematics and Financial Economics, 7 (2013), 509530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bally, V., and Printems, J.. “A Quantization Tree Method for Pricing and Hedging Multidimensional American Options.” Mathematical Finance, 15 (2005), 119168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensoussan, A., and Lions, J.-L.. Applications of Variational Inequalities in Stochastic Control, Vol. 12, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier (1982).Google Scholar
Biagini, F., and Björk, T.. “On the Timing Option in a Futures Contract.” Mathematical Finance, 17 (2007), 267283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birge, J. R., and Linetsky, V.. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Financial Engineering, Vol. 15, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier (2007).Google Scholar
Bjerksund, P., and Stensland, G.. “Closed Form Spread Option Valuation.” Quantitative Finance, 14 (2014), 17851794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. J., and Schwartz, E. S.. “Evaluating Natural Resource Investments.” Journal of Business, 58 (1985), 135157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunch, D. S., and Johnson, H.. “The American Put Option and Its Critical Stock Price.” Journal of Finance, 55 (2000), 23332356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona, R., and Dayanik, S.. “Optimal Multiple Stopping of Linear Diffusions.” Mathematics of Operations Research, 33 (2008), 446460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona, R., and Touzi, N.. “Optimal Multiple Stopping and Valuation of Swing Options.” Mathematical Finance, 18 (2008), 239268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, P.Randomization and the American Put.” The Review of Financial Studies, 11 (1998), 597626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Compernolle, T.; Huisman, K.; Kort, P.; Lavrutich, M.; Nunes, C.; and Thijssen, J.. “Investment Decisions with Two-Factor Uncertainty.” CentER Discussion Paper Series No. 2018-003 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cont, R., and Fournié, D.-A.. “Functional Itô Calculus and Stochastic Integral Representation of Martingales.” Annals of Probability, 41 (2013), 109133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortazar, G.; Gravet, M.; and Urzua, J.. “The Valuation of Multidimensional American Real Options Using the LSM Simulation Method.” Computers & Operations Research, 35 (2008), 113129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. C.; Ross, S. A.; and Rubinstein, M.. “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 229263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
d’Halluin, Y.; Forsyth, P. A.; and Labahn, G.. “A Penalty Method for American Options with Jump Diffusion Processes.” Numerische Mathematik, 97 (2004), 321352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, A., and Pindyck, R.. Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dockendorf, J., and Paxson, D.. “Continuous Rainbow Options on Commodity Outputs: What Is the Real Value of Switching Facilities?European Journal of Finance, 19 (2013), 645673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, P., and Wang, H.. “Optimal Stopping with Random Intervention Times.” Advances in Applied Probability, 34 (2002), 141157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekern, S.An Option Pricing Approach to Evaluating Petroleum Projects.” Energy Economics, 10 (1988), 9199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farzan, F.; Mahani, K.; Gharieh, K.; and Jafari, M. A.. “Microgrid Investment under Uncertainty: A Real Option Approach Using Closed Form Contingent Analysis.” Annals of Operations Research, 235 (2015), 259276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, L., and Linetsky, V.. “Pricing Options in Jump-Diffusion Models: An Extrapolation Approach.” Operations Research, 56 (2008), 304325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsyth, P. A., and Vetzal, K. R.. “Quadratic Convergence for Valuing American Options Using a Penalty Method.” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 23 (2002), 20952122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glowinski, R. Lectures on Numerical Methods for Non-Linear Variational Problems. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media (2008).Google Scholar
Heydari, S.; Ovenden, N.; and Siddiqui, A.. “Real Options Analysis of Investment in Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technology.” Computational Management Science, 9 (2012), 109138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, R.-J.; Ralph, D.; and van Casteren, J.. “A Vanilla Framework for Solving Multidimensional Options Using Poisson Optional Stopping Times.” Working Paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, R.-J., and Teulings, C.. “The Option Value of Vacant Land and the Optimal Timing of City Extensions.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12847 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempa, J.Optimal Stopping with Information Constraint.” Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 66 (2012), 147173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, F. A., and Schwartz, E. S.. “Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 113147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majd, S., and Pindyck, R. S.. “Time to Build, Option Value, and Investment Decisions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 18 (1987), 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, R., and Siegel, D.. “The Value of Waiting to Invest.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101 (1986), 707727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peskir, G., and Shiryeav, A.. Optimal Stopping and Free-Boundary Problems. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser (2006).Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S.“Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Investment.” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plemmons, R. J. M-Matrix Characterizations. I—Nonsingular M-Matrices.” Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 18 (1977), 175188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revuz, D., and Yor, M.. Continuous Martingales and Brownian Motion, Vol. 293, Berlin, Germany: Springer (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, L. C.Monte Carlo Valuation of American Options.” Mathematical Finance, 12 (2002), 271286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, L. C., and Williams, D.. Diffusions, Markov Processes, and Martingales, Vol. 1, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2000).Google Scholar
Rogers, L. C., and Zane, O.. “A Simple Model of Liquidity Effects.” In Advances in Finance and Stochastics, Sandmann, K. and Schönbucher, P. J., eds. Berlin, Germany: Springer (2002), 161176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, W., and Madlener, R.. “Valuation of CCS-Ready Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Multi-Dimensional Real Options Approach.” Energy Systems, 2 (2011), 243261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, E. S.The Valuation of Warrants: Implementing a New Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics, 4 (1977), 7993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stentoft, L.Convergence of the Least Squares Monte Carlo Approach to American Option Valuation.” Management Science, 50 (2004), 11931203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Støre, K.; Fleten, S.-E.; Hagspiel, V.; and Nunes, C.. “Switching from Oil to Gas Production in a Depleting Field.” European Journal of Operational Research, 271 (2018), 710719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroock, D. W., and Varadhan, S. R. S.. Multidimensional Diffusion Processes. Berlin, Germany: Springer (2007).Google Scholar
Strulovici, B., and Szydlowski, M.. “On the Smoothness of Value Functions and the Existence of Optimal Strategies in Diffusion Models.” Journal of Economic Theory, 159 (2015), 10161055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stutzman, S.; Weiland, B.; Preckel, P.; and Wetzstein, M.. “Optimal Replacement Policies for an Uncertain Rejuvenated Asset.” International Journal of Production Economics, 185 (2017), 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svenstrup, M.On the Suboptimality of Single-Factor Exercise Strategies for Bermudan Swaptions.” Journal of Financial Economics, 78 (2005), 651684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigeorgis, L.A Log-Transformed Binomial Numerical Analysis Method for Valuing Complex Multi-Option Investments.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26 (1991), 309326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigeorgis, L.The Nature of Option Interactions and the Valuation of Investments with Multiple Real Options.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28 (1993), 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S.; Yang, X.; and Teo, K.. “Power Penalty Method for a Linear Complementarity Problem Arising from American Option Valuation.” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 129 (2006), 227254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, K.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; and Teo, K. L.. “A Power Penalty Approach to Numerical Solutions of Two-Asset American Options.” Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications, 2 (2009), 202223.Google Scholar
Zhang, K.; Yang, X.; and Teo, K. L.. “Convergence Analysis of a Monotonic Penalty Method for American Option Pricing.” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 348 (2008), 915926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zvan, R.; Forsyth, P. A.; and Vetzal, K. R.. “Penalty Methods for American Options with Stochastic Volatility.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 91 (1998), 199218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Real-Option Valuation in Multiple Dimensions Using Poisson Optional Stopping Times
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Real-Option Valuation in Multiple Dimensions Using Poisson Optional Stopping Times
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Real-Option Valuation in Multiple Dimensions Using Poisson Optional Stopping Times
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *