Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:07:39.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Right on Schedule: CEO Option Grants and Opportunism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2018

Robert M. Daines ,
Grant R. McQueen  and
Robert J. Schonlau
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After the public outcry over backdating, many firms began scheduling option grants. This eliminates backdating but creates other agency problems: Chief executive officers (CEOs) aware of upcoming option grants have an incentive to temporarily depress stock prices to obtain lower strike prices. We show that some CEOs have manipulated stock prices to increase option compensation, documenting negative abnormal returns before scheduled option grants and positive abnormal returns afterward. These returns are explained by measures of CEOs’ incentives and ability to influence stock prices. We document several mechanisms used to lower stock price, including changing the substance and timing of disclosures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , June 2018 , pp. 1025 - 1058
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We appreciate helpful comments from an anonymous referee, Yakov Amihud, Louca Christodoulos, Jeff Coles, Michael Drake, Jarrad Harford (the editor), William Hubbard, Dirk Jenter, Wei Jiang, Marcel Kahan, Steven Kaplan, Jonathan Karpoff, Ron Kasznik, Mike Klausner, Dave Larcker, Erik Lie, Allan McCall, Todd Mitton, Brennan Platt, Ryan Pratt, and David Yermack, as well as seminar participants at Brigham Young University, University of Chicago, Columbia University, Harvard University, Northwestern University, New York University, Stanford University, Yale University, the 2013 American Law and Economics Association conference, and the 2014 European Financial Management Association conference. McQueen received financial support from the William Edwards Professorship. We acknowledge the Brigham Young University Silver Fund and Whitmore Global Management Center, and Stanford University’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance, which paid for databases and research support.

References

Aboody, D., and Kasznik, R.. “CEO Stock Option Awards and the Timing of Corporate Voluntary Disclosures.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (2000), 73–100.Google Scholar
American College of Trial Lawyers. “Recommended Practices for Companies and Their Counsel in Conducting Internal Investigations.” American Criminal Law Review, 46(2009), 73–105.Google Scholar
Baker, T.; Collins, D.; and Reitenga, A.. “Incentives and Opportunities to Manage Earnings around Option Grants.” Contemporary Accounting Research, 26 (2009), 649–672.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L., and Fried, J.. “Paying for Long-Term Performance.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 159 (2010), 1915–1959.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L.; Grinstein, Y.; and Peyer, U.. “Lucky CEOs and Lucky Directors.” Journal of Finance, 65 (2010), 2363–2401.Google Scholar
Bickley, J., and Shorter, G.. “Stock Options: The Backdating Issue.” Feb. 3, 2009, Congressional Research Service, Report No. RL33926 (2009).Google Scholar
Black, F., and Scholes, M.. “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 673–654.Google Scholar
Carhart, M.“On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 57–82.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S.; John, K.; and Yan, A.. “Takeovers and Divergence of Investor Opinion.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 227–277.Google Scholar
Chauvin, K., and Shenoy, C.. “Stock Price Decreases Prior to Executive Stock Option Grants.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (2001), 53–76.Google Scholar
Chuk, E.; Matsumoto, D.; and Miller, G.. “Assessing Methods of Identifying Management Forecasts: CIG vs. Researcher Collected.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55 (2013), 23–42.Google Scholar
Cohen, D.; Dey, A.; and Lys, T.. “Real and Accrual-Based Earnings Management in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes–Oxley Periods.” Accounting Review, 83 (2008), 757–787.Google Scholar
Coles, J.; Hertzel, M.; and Kalpathy, S.. “Earnings Management around Employee Stock Option Reissues.” Journal of Accounting and Economic, 41 (2006), 173–200.Google Scholar
Collins, D., and Hribar, P.. “Earnings-Based and Accrual-Based Market Anomalies: One Effect or Two?” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (2000), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, Q., and Myers, M.. “Do the Merits Matter? Evidence from Options Backdating Litigation.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 146 (2016), 291–347.Google Scholar
Dellavigna, S., and Pollet, J.. “Investor Inattention and Friday Earnings Announcements.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 709–749.Google Scholar
Devos, E.; Elliott, W.; and Warr, R.. “CEO Opportunism? Option Grants and Stock Trades around Stock Splits.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60 (2015), 18–25.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.; Goncalves-Pinto, L.; Wang, Y.; and Xu, W.. “Strategic News Releases in Equity Vesting Months.” Working Paper, European Corporate Governance Institute (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Finance, 33 (1993), 3–56.Google Scholar
Fich, E.; Cai, J.; and Tran, A.. “Stock Option Grants to Target CEOs during Private Merger Negotiations.” Journal of Financial Economics, 101 (2011), 413–430.Google Scholar
Frydman, C., and Jenter, D.. “CEO Compensation.” Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2 (2010), 75–102.Google Scholar
Gao, H., and Mahmudi, H.. “Backdating Executive Stock Option Grants: An Agency Problem or Just Efficient Contracting?” Presented at the Western Finance Association Conference annual meeting (2008).Google Scholar
Gunny, K.“The Relation between Earning Management Using Real Activities Manipulation and Future Performance: Evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks.” Contemporary Accounting Research, 27 (2010), 855–888.Google Scholar
Hall, B.“The Design of Multi-Year Stock Options Plans.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12 (1999), 97–106.Google Scholar
Hayes, R.; Lemmon, M.; and Qui, M.. “Stock Options and Managerial Incentives for Risk Taking: Evidence from FAS 123R.” Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (2012), 174–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heron, R., and Lie, E.. “Does Backdating Explain the Stock Price Pattern around Executive Stock Option Grants?” Journal of Financial Economics, 83 (2007), 271–295.Google Scholar
Heron, R., and Lie, E.. “What Fraction of Stock Option Grants to Top Executives Have Been Backdated or Manipulated?” Management Science, 55 (2009), 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirshleifer, D.; Lim, S.; and Teoh, S.. “Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 2289–2325.Google Scholar
Huang, W., and Lu, H.. “New Evidence on the CEO’s Stock Option Timing Behaviors: Do the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and New Compensation Disclosure Rules Matter?” Working Paper, University of Toronto (2012).Google Scholar
Lie, E.“On the Timing of CEO Stock Option Awards.” Management Science, 51 (2005), 802–812.Google Scholar
Liu, L.; Liu, H.; and Yin, J.. “Stock Option Schedules and Managerial Opportunism.” Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 41 (2014), 652–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAnally, M.; Srivastava, A.; and Weaver, C.. “Executive Stock Options, Missed Earnings Targets, and Earnings Management.” Accounting Review, 83 (2008), 185–216.Google Scholar
Narayanan, M., and Seyhun, H.. “The Dating Game: Do Managers Designate Option Grant Dates to Increase Their Compensation?” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2008), 1907–1945.Google Scholar
Nelson, M.; Elliott, J.; and Tarpley, R.. “Evidence from Auditors about Managers’ and Auditors’ Earnings Management Decisions.” Accounting Review, 77 Supplement (2002), 175–202.Google Scholar
Sen, R.“The Returns to Spring-Loading.” Working Paper, New York University (2009).Google Scholar
Shue, K., and Townsend, R.. “Growth through Rigidity: An Explanation for the Rise in CEO Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017a), 1–21.Google Scholar
Shue, K., and Townsend, R.. “How Do Quasi-Random Option Grants Affect CEO Risk-Taking?” Journal of Finance, 72 (2017b), 2551–2588.Google Scholar