Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5f95dd588d-q9h4c Total loading time: 0.195 Render date: 2021-10-28T22:14:23.472Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Best Practice for Cost-of-Capital Estimates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2017

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cost-of-capital assessments with factor models require quantitative forward-looking estimates. We recommend estimating Vasicek-shrunk betas with 1–4 years of daily stock returns and then shrinking betas a second time (and more for smaller stocks and longer-term projects), because the underlying betas are themselves time-varying. Such estimators also work well in other developed countries and for small-minus-big (SMB) and high-minus-low (HML) exposures. If own historical stock returns are not available, peer betas based on market cap should be used. Historical industry averages have almost no predictive power and should never be used.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2017 

Footnotes

1

We thank Zhi Da (the referee), Jarrad Harford (the editor), Susan Huot (the business and preproduction manager), many colleagues, and seminar participants at California State University at Fullerton, the University of California at Los Angeles, Cornell University, the Federal Reserve Board, and Brigham Young University.

References

Ait-Sahalia, Y.; Kalnina, I.; and Xiu, D.. “The Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle: A Reassessment at High Frequency.” Working Paper, University of Chicago (2014).Google Scholar
Armstrong, C. S.; Banerjee, S.; and Corona, C.. “Factor-Loading Uncertainty and Expected Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 158207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.; Hoeyer, M. F.; and Wurgler, J.. “The Risk Anomaly Tradeoff of Leverage.” Working Paper, Harvard Business School, University of Oxford, and New York University (2016).Google Scholar
Barry, C. B.Bayesian Betas and Deception: A Comment.” Journal of Financial Research, 3 (1980), 8590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, J., and DeMarzo, P.. Corporate Finance, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Pearson (2014).Google Scholar
Bhardwaj, G.; Gorton, G.; and Rouwenhorst, G.. “Facts and Fantasies about Commodity Futures Ten Years Later.” Working Paper, NBER (2015).Google Scholar
Blume, M. E.On the Assessment of Risk.” Journal of Finance, 26 (1971), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brealey, R.; Myers, S.; and Allen, F.. Principles of Corporate Finance, 12th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin (2016).Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y.; Sunderam, A.; and Viceira, L. M.. “Inflation Bets or Deflation Hedges? The Changing Risks of Nominal Bonds.” Critical Finance Review, 6 (2017).Google Scholar
Da, Z.; Guo, R.-J.; and Jagannathan, R.. “CAPM for Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital: Interpreting the Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Financial Economics, 103 (2012), 204220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimson, E.Risk Measurement When Shares Are Subject to Infrequent Trading.” Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (1979), 197226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, E. J.; Gruber, M. J.; and Urich, T. J.. “Are Betas Best?Journal of Finance, 33 (1978), 13751384.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “Industry Costs of Equity.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 153193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and French, K. R.. “The Equity Premium.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 637659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., and MacBeth, J. D.. “Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, L., and Kamin, J. H.. “Forecasting Systematic Risk: Estimates of ‘Raw’ Beta That Take Account of the Tendency of Beta to Change and the Heteroskedasticity of Residual Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 20 (1985), 127149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazzini, A., and Pedersen, L. H.. “Betting against Beta.” Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (2014), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. R., and Harvey, C. R.. “The Theory and Practice of Corporate Finance: Evidence from the Field.” Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2001), 187243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis, 6th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson (2008).Google Scholar
Harvey, C. R., and Liu, Y.. “Rethinking Performance Evaluation.” Working Paper, Duke University and Texas A&M University (2016).Google Scholar
Jacobs, M. T., and Shivdasani, A.. “Do You Know Your Cost of Capital?Harvard Business Review, 90 (2012), 118124.Google Scholar
Jacquier, E.; Kane, A.; and Marcus, A. J.. “Optimal Estimation of the Risk Premium for the Long Run and Asset Allocation: A Case of Compounded Estimation Risk.” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 3 (2005), 3755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, R.; Matsa, D. A.; Meier, I.; and Tarhan, V.. “Why Do Firms Use High Discount Rates?Journal of Financial Economics, 120 (2016), 445463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagannathan, R., and Wang, Z.. “The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. J.; Bennett, R. E.; and Curcio, R. J.. “A Note on the Deceptive Nature of Bayesian Forecasted Betas.” Journal of Financial Research, 2 (1979), 6569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jostova, G., and Philipov, A.. “Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Betas.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 40 (2005), 747778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karolyi, G. A.Predicting Risk: Some New Generalizations.” Management Science, 38 (1992), 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kothari, S.; Shanken, J.; and Sloan, R.. “Another Look at the Cross-Section of Expected Returns.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 185224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasker, W. S.The Peso Problem in Testing the Efficiency of Forward Exchange Markets.” Journal of Monetary Economy, 6 (1980), 269276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krüger, P.; Landier, A.; and Thesmar, D.. “The WACC Fallacy: The Real Effects of Using a Unique Discount Rate.” Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 12531285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, M., and Roll, R.. “The Market Portfolio May Be Mean/Variance Efficient After All.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 24642491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewellen, J.The Cross Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Critical Finance Review, 4 (2015), 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamaysky, H.; Spiegel, M.; and Zhang, H.. “Estimating the Dynamics of Mutual Fund Alphas and Betas.” Review of Financial Studies, 21 (2007), 233264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, R., and Prescott, E. C.. “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 15 (1985), 145161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Officer, L. H.“What Was the Interest Rate Then? A Data Study.” Available at http://www.measuringworth.com/interestrates/ (2014).Google Scholar
Rogoff, K.“Rational Expectations in the Foreign Exchange Market Revisited.” Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1977).Google Scholar
Ross, S.; Westerfield, R.; Jaffe, J.; and Jordan, B.. Corporate Finance, 11th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin (2016).Google Scholar
Schulz, F.On the Timing and Pricing of Dividends: Comment.” American Economic Review, 106 (2016), 31853223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwert, G. W.Stock Returns and Real Activity: A Century of Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 45 (1990), 12371257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Binsbergen, J.; Brandt, M.; and Koijen, R.. “On the Timing and Pricing of Dividends.” American Economic Review, 102 (2012), 15961618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasicek, O. A.A Note on Using Cross-Sectional Information in Bayesian Estimation of Security Betas.” Journal of Finance, 28 (1973), 12331239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, I. Corporate Finance. 3rd ed, Los Angeles, CA: Ivo Welch (2014).Google Scholar
Welch, I.The (Time-Varying) Importance of Disaster Risk.” Financial Analysts Journal, 72 (2016), 1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. W., and Jones, C. P.. “A Comparison of Annual Common Stock Returns: 1871–1925 with 1926–85.” Journal of Business, 60 (1987), 239258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Levi and Welch supplementary material

Levi and Welch supplementary material

Download Levi and Welch supplementary material(File)
File 79 KB
You have Access
23
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Best Practice for Cost-of-Capital Estimates
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Best Practice for Cost-of-Capital Estimates
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Best Practice for Cost-of-Capital Estimates
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *