Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T06:24:07.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment: Natural Behavior Toward Risk and the Question of Value Determination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

John P. Herzog
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Professor Huntsman's paper is a welcome addition to the growing literature on portfolio theory. Traditional mean-variance analysis, in spite of its obvious simplicity and its ability to explain portfolio diversification, has come under increasing attack, both for the theoretical weaknesses underlying the technique and for its failure to recognize that investors manifestly prefer returns that are positively skewed to those that are not.

Type
Discussants
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , March 1973 , pp. 357 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Arrow, K. J.Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing, Lectures. Helsinki: 1964.Google Scholar
[2]Borch, K. “A Note on Uncertainty and Indifference Curves.” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36 (January 1969), pp. 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Cootner, P. H.The Random Character of Stock Market Prices. Cambridge, Mass.: 1964.Google Scholar
[4]Feldstein, M. S. “Mean-Variance Analysis in the Theory of Liquidity Preference and Portfolio Selection.” Review of Economic Studies, vol. 36 (January 1969), pp. 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Hicks, J. “Liquidity.” Economic Journal, vol. 72 (December 1962), pp. 787–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Hirschleifer, J.Investment, Interest, and Capital. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: 1970.Google Scholar
[7]Pratt, J. W. “Risk Aversion in the Small and the Large.” Econometrica, vol. 32 (January 1964), pp. 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Tsiang, S. C. “The Rationale of Mean-Standard Deviation Analysis, Skewness Preference, and the Demand for Money.” American Economic Review, vol. 62 (June 1972), pp. 354–371.Google Scholar