Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Firm Characteristics, Relative Efficiency, and Equity Returns

  • Giao X. Nguyen (a1) and Peggy E. Swanson (a2)
Abstract

This study uses a stochastic frontier approach to evaluate firm efficiency. The resulting efficiency score, based on firm characteristics, is the input for performance evaluation. The portfolio composed of highly efficient firms significantly underperforms the portfolio composed of inefficient firms even after adjustment for firm characteristics and risk factors, suggesting a required premium for the inefficient firms. The difference in performance between the two portfolios remains for at least five years after the portfolio formation year. In addition, firm efficiency exhibits significant explanatory power for average equity returns in cross-sectional analysis.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aigner, D.; Lovell, C.; and Schmidt, P.. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics, 6 (1977), 2137.
Anderson, C., and Garcia-Feijoo, L.. “Empirical Evidence on Capital Investment, Growth Options, and Security Returns.”Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 171194.
Barr, R.; Killgo, K.; Siems, T.; and Zimmel, S.. “Evaluating the Productive Efficiency and Performance of U.S. Commercial Banks.” Managerial Finance, 28 (2002), 325.
Barr, R.; Seiford, L.; and Siems, T.. “Forecasting Bank Failure: A Non-Parametric Approach.” Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 60 (1994), 411429.
Berger, A., and Humphrey, D.. “Measurement and Efficiency Issues in Commercial Banking.” In Measurement Issues in the Service Sectors, Griliches, Z., ed. Chicago, IL: National Bureau of Economic Research, University of Chicago Press (1992), 245279.
Berger, A., and Humphrey, D.. “Efficiency of Financial Institutions: International Survey and Directions for Future Research.” European Journal of Operational Research, 98 (1997), 175212.
Carhart, M. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 5782.
Cebenoyan, A.; Cooperman, E.; and Register, C.. “Firm Inefficiency and the Regulatory Closure of S&Ls: An Empirical Investigation.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 75 (1993), 540545.
Daniel, K.; Grinblatt, M.; Titman, S.; and Wermers, R.. “Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristics-Based Benchmarks.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 10351058.
Daniel, K., and Titman, S.. “Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross-Sectional Variation in Common Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 133.
Demsetz, H. “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy.” Journal of Law and Economics, 16 (1973), 19.
Demsetz, H. “Two Systems of Belief About Monopoly.” In Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Goldschmid, H. J., Mann, H. M., and Weston, J. F., eds. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company (1974), 164184.
Demsetz, H., and Villalonga, B.. “Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (2001), 209233.
Fama, E. “Market Efficiency, Long-Term Returns, and Behavioral Finance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 49 (1998), 283306.
Fama, E., and French, K.. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 427465.
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Common Risk Factors in the Returns of Stocks and Bonds.” Journal of Financial Economics, 33 (1993), 356.
Fama, E., and French, K.. “Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings Return.” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 131155.
Fama, E., and MacBeth, J.. “Risk Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests.” Journal of Political Economy, 81 (1973), 607636.
Greene, W. “Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of Productivity Analysis, 23 (2005), 732.
Grullon, G.; Kanatas, G.; and Weston, J.. “Advertising, Breadth of Ownership, and Liquidity.” Review of Financial Studies, 17 (2004), 439461.
Habib, M., and Ljungqvist, A.. “Firm Value and Managerial Incentives: A Stochastic Frontier Approach.”Journal of Business, 78 (2005), 20532093.
Hermalin, B., and Wallace, N.. “The Determinants of Efficiency and Solvency in Savings and Loans.” RAND Journal of Economics, 25 (1994), 361381.
Hou, K., and Robinson, D.. “Industry Concentration and Average Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 19271956.
Hunt-McCool, J.; Koh, C.; and Francis, B.. “Testing for Deliberate Underpricing in the IPO Premarket: A Stochastic Frontier Approach.” Review of Financial Studies, 9 (1996), 12511269.
Loughran, T., and Ritter, J.. “Uniformly Least Powerful Tests of Market Efficiency.” Journal of Financial Economics, 55 (2000), 369389.
McConnell, J., and Servaes, H.. “Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.” Journal of Financial Economics, 27 (1990), 595612.
Morck, R.; Shleifer, A.; and Vishny, R.. “Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Financial Economics, 20 (1988), 293315.
Palia, D. “The Endogeneity of Managerial Compensation in Firm Valuation: A Solution.” Review of Financial Studies, 14 (2001), 735764.
Peltzman, S. “The Gains and Losses from Industrial Concentration.” Journal of Law and Economics, 20 (1977), 229263.
Shumway, T. “The Delisting Bias in CRSP Data.” Journal of Finance, 52 (1997), 327340.
Shumway, T., and Warther, V.. “The Delisting Bias in CRSP’s NASDAQ Data and Its Implications for the Size Effect.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 23612379.
Titman, S.; Wei, J.; and Xie, F.. “Capital Investments and Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39 (2004), 677700.
Wermers, R. “Is Money Really ‘Smart? ’ New Evidence on the Relation between Mutual Fund Flows, Manager Behavior, and Performance Persistence.” Working Paper, University of Maryland (2004).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
  • ISSN: 0022-1090
  • EISSN: 1756-6916
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed