Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T14:47:49.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying Large Problem/Failed Banks: The Case of Franklin National Bank of New York

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

If the “smart money” was out of Franklin before its financial difficulties became public knowledge, just what elements of Franklin's balance sheet were the sagacious analysts reading and why weren't the banking authorities aware of this information? The purpose of this paper is to determine what balance-sheet and income-statement figures, if any, could have been arrayed in an ex post early-warning system to spotlight Franklin's developing problems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Annual Report 1958 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Washington, D.C., pp. 27127.Google Scholar
[2]Annual Report 1974 Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “Resolving the Problem of Franklin National Bank,” pp. 2126.Google Scholar
[3]Barnett, Robert A.Anatomy of a Bank Failure.The Magazine of Bank Qdministration (April 1972), pp. 2023, 43.Google Scholar
[4]Benston, George J. “Bank Examination.” The Bulletin, Nos. 89–90, New York University, Graduate School of Business (May 1973).Google Scholar
[5]Burns, Arthur F.Maintaining the Soundness of Our Banking System.” Monthly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (November 1974), pp. 263267. Reprint of an address before the 1974 American Bankers Association Convention, Honolulu, Hawaii (October 21, 1974).Google Scholar
[6]Eisenbeis, Robert A., and Avery, Robert B.. Discriminant Analysis and Classification Procedures: Theory and Applications. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Company (1972).Google Scholar
[7]Eisenbeis, Robert A., and Avery, Robert B.. “Two Aspects of Investigating Group Differences in Linear Discriminant Analysis.Decision Sciences (October 1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Haskins and Sells Study 1974–1975, The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (May 1975).Google Scholar
[9]Horvitz, Paul M.Failure of Large Banks: Implications for Banking Supervision and Deposit Insurance.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (November 1975), pp. 589601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Kaufman, George G. “Preventing Bank Failures.” Compendium of Major Issues in Banking Regulation. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office (May 1975), pp. 769796.Google Scholar
[11]Orgler, Yair E.A Credit-Scoring Model for Commercial Loans.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking (November 1970), pp. 435445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Rose, Sanford. “What Really Went Wrong at Franklin National.Fortune (October 1974), pp. 118121, 220, 223–227.Google Scholar
[13]Sinkey, Joseph F. Jr.Bank Capital, Loan Evaluations, and Problem Banks.Washington, D.C.: FDIC Working Paper No. 76–2.Google Scholar
[14]Sinkey, Joseph F. Jr.Adverse Publicity and Bank Deposit Flows: The Cases of Franklin National Bank of New York and United States National Bank of San Diego.Journal of Bank Research (Summer 1975), pp. 109112.Google Scholar
[15]Sinkey, Joseph F. Jr.The Failure of United States National Bank of San Diego: A Portfolio and Performance Analysis.Journal of Bank Research (Spring 1975), pp. 824.Google Scholar
[16]Sinkey, Joseph F. Jr.A Multivariate Statistical Analysis of the Characteristics of Problem Banks.Journal of Finance (March 1975), pp. 2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Sinkey, Joseph F. Jr.The Way Problem Banks Perform.The Bankers Magazine (Autumn 1974), pp. 4051.Google Scholar
[18]Sinkey, Joseph F. Jr. “The Effects of Foreign Operations on the Safety and Soundness of Large Commercial Banks.” Unpublished FDIC Memorandum (August 28, 1974).Google Scholar
[19]Sinkey, Joseph F. Jr., and Walker, David A.. “Problem Banks: Identification and Characteristics.Journal of Bank Research (Winter 1975), pp. 208217.Google Scholar
[20]Slocum, John J.Why 57 Insured Banks Did Not Make It.Journal of Commercial Bank Lending (August 1973), pp. 4456.Google Scholar
[21]U. S. Congress, House Committee on Banking Currency and Housing, Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy. “An Act to Lower Interest Rates and Allocate Credit,” Hearings on H.R. 212 (February 4–6, 1975),94th Congress, First Session, Washington: U.S. Government Prin ing Office,1975. (Statements and information relating to Franklin appear on pages 200–273.)Google Scholar
[22]Welles, Chris. “The Needlessly High Cost of Folding Franklin National.New York Magazine (November 18, 1974), pp. 7172, 74, 76–78, 81.Google Scholar
[23]Wille, Frank. “The FDIC and Franklin National Bank: A Report to the Congress and All FDIC-Insured Banks.”FDIC Press Release 69–74. Reprint of an address before the 81st Annual Convention of the Savings Bank Association of New York State,Baco Raton, Florida(November 23, 1974).Google Scholar