Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Innovation Strategy of Private Firms

  • Huasheng Gao, Po-Hsuan Hsu and Kai Li
Abstract

We compare innovation strategies of public and private firms based on a large sample over the period 1997–2008. We find that public firms’ patents rely more on existing knowledge, are more exploitative, and are less likely in new technology classes, while private firms’ patents are broader in scope and more exploratory. We investigate whether these strategies are due to differences in firm information environments, CEO risk preferences, firm life cycles, corporate acquisition policies, or investment horizons between these two groups of firms. Our evidence suggests that the shorter investment horizon associated with public equity markets is a key explanatory factor.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Innovation Strategy of Private Firms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Innovation Strategy of Private Firms
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Innovation Strategy of Private Firms
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Gao (corresponding author), huashenggao@fudan.edu.cn, Fudan University Fanhai International School of Finance; Hsu, paulhsu@hku.hk, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Business and Economics; and Li, kai.li@sauder.ubc.ca, University of British Columbia Sauder School of Business.
Footnotes
Hide All
1

We are grateful for helpful comments from an anonymous referee, Andres Almazan, Julian Atanassov, Jan Bena, Thomas Chemmanur, Guoli Chen, Bill Kerr, Tomislav Ladika, Alexander Ljunqgvist, Paul Malatesta (the editor), Gustavo Manso, Ron Masulis, Hernan Ortiz-Molina, Neslihan Ozkan, Ivan Png, Jay Ritter, Morten Sorensen, Xuan Tian, Cheng-Wei Wu, Ting Xu, Yu Yuan, Alminas Žaldokas, seminar participants at Boston University, Harvard Business School, Nanyang Technological University, National Chengchi University, Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, University of Bristol, University of British Columbia, University of Exeter, University of Hong Kong, University of International Business and Economics, University of Oklahoma, and conference participants at the 2013 Conference on the Theories and Practices of Securities and Financial Markets, the 2014 Financial Management Association Asia Pacific Conference, the 2014 International Conference on Corporate Finance and Financial Markets, and the 2014 China International Conference in Finance. We acknowledge the effort of our research assistants Rita Lei Chen, Yi Du, Cherry Guo, Jialing Hu, Yunan Liu, and Chi-Yang Tsou. Hsu acknowledges the support from the General Research Fund sponsored by the Research Grants Council in Hong Kong (Ref. 17500015). Li acknowledges financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC Grant Number: 435-2013-0023). All errors are our own.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Acharya V. V., and Xu Z.. “Financial Dependence and Innovation: The Case of Public versus Private Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 124 (2017), 223243.
Aggarwal V. A., and Hsu D. H.. “Entrepreneurial Exits and Innovation.” Management Science, 60 (2014), 867887.
Aghion P.; Angeletos G.-M.; Banerjee A.; and Manova K.. “Volatility and Growth: Credit Constraints and the Composition of Investment.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 57 (2010), 246265.
Aghion P.; Bond S.; Klemm A.; and Marinescu I.. “Technology and Financial Structure: Are Innovative Firms Different?Journal of the European Economic Association, 2 (2004), 277288.
Aghion P.; Van Reenen J.; and Zingales L.. “Innovation and Institutional Ownership.” American Economic Review, 103 (2013), 277304.
Angrist J.Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 19 (2001), 216.
Angrist J., and Krueger A.. “Instrumental Variables and the Search for Identification: From Supply and Demand to Natural Experiments.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2001), 6985.
Asker J.; Farre-Mensa J.; and Ljungqvist A.. “Corporate Investment and Stock Market Listing: A Puzzle?Review of Financial Studies, 28 (2015), 342390.
Atanassov J.; Nanda V.; and Seru A.. “Finance and Innovation: The Case of Publicly Traded Firms.” Working Paper, University of Oregon (2007).
Balsmeier B.; Fleming L.; and Manso G.. “Independent Boards and Innovation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 536557.
Barrot J.-N.Investor Horizon and the Life Cycle of Innovative Firms: Evidence from Venture Capital.” Management Science, 63 (2017), 30213043.
Benner M. J., and Tushman M.. “Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 47 (2002), 676706.
Bereskin F.; Hsu P.-H.; and Rotenberg W.. “The Real Effects of Real Earnings Management: Evidence from Innovation.” Contemporary Accounting Research, forthcoming (2017).
Bernstein S.Does Going Public Affect Innovation?Journal of Finance, 70 (2015), 13651403.
Bharath S. T., and Dittmar A. K.. “Why Do Firms Use Private Equity to Opt Out of Public Markets?Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 17711818.
Bhattacharya S., and Ritter J. R.. “Innovation and Communication: Signaling with Partial Disclosure.” Review of Economic Studies, 50 (1983), 331346.
Bloom N.; Schankerman M.; and Van Reenen J.. “Identifying Technology Spillovers and Product Market Rivalry.” Econometrica, 81 (2013), 13471393.
Bolton P; Scheinkman J.; and Xiong W.. “Executive Compensation in Speculative Markets.” Review of Economics Studies, 73 (2006), 577610.
Brav O.Access to Capital, Capital Structure, and the Funding of the Firm.” Journal of Finance, 64 (2009), 263308.
Brown J.; Ivkovic Z.; Smith P.; and Weisbenner S.. “Neighbors Matter: Causal Community Effects and Stock Market Participation.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 15091531.
Bushee B. J.The Influence of Institutional Investors on Myopic R&D Investment Behavior.” Accounting Review, 73 (1998), 305333.
Bushee B. J.Do Institutional Investors Prefer Near-Term Earnings over Long-Run Value?Contemporary Accounting Research, 18 (2001), 207246.
Chemmanur T. J.; He S.; and Nandy D. K.. “The Going-Public Decision and the Product Market.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 18551908.
Cirillo B.; Brusoni S.; and Valentini G.. “The Rejuvenation of Inventors through Corporate Spinouts.” Organization Science, 25 (2013), 17641784.
Cockburn I.; Henderson R. M.; and Stern S.. “Untangling the Origins of Competitive Advantage.” Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2000), 11231145.
Cohen W. M., and Levinthal D. A.. “Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm.” Management Science, 40 (1994), 227251.
Cohen W. M.; Levin R. C.; and Mowery D. C.. “Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Re-Examination.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 35 (1987), 543565.
Coval J., and Moskowitz T.. “Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 139.
Cremers M.; Nair V.; and John K.. “Takeovers and the Cross-Section of Returns.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 14091445.
Economist. “Out of the Ivory Tower.” Economist, 314(Feb. 3, 1990), 7576.
Edmans A.; Fang V. W.; and Lewellen K. A.. “Equity Vesting and Investment.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 22292271.
Faccio M.; Marchica M.-T.; and Mura R.. “Large Shareholder Diversification and Corporate Risk-Taking.” Review of Financial Studies, 24 (2011), 36013641.
Fama E., and French K.. “Industry Costs of Capital.” Journal of Financial Economics, 43 (1997), 153193.
Fang V. W.; Tian X.; and Tice S.. “Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation?Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 20852125.
Ferreira D.; Manso G.; and Silva A. C.. “Incentives to Innovate and the Decision to Go Public or Private.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 256300.
Gao H.; Harford J.; and Li K.. “Determinants of Corporate Cash Policy: Insights from Private Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 109 (2013), 623639.
Gao H.; Harford J.; and Li K.. “CEO Turnover–Performance Sensitivity in Private Firms.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52 (2017), 583611.
Gao H., and Li K.. “A Comparison of CEO Pay–Performance Sensitivity in Privately-Held and Public Firms.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 35 (2015), 370388.
Gopalan R.; Milbourn T.; Song F.; and Thakor A.. “Duration of Executive Compensation.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 27772817.
Graham J. R.; Harvey C. R.; and Rajgopal S.. “The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40 (2005), 373.
Hall B. H.; Jaffe A. B.; and Trajtenberg M.. “The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights and Methodological Tools.” In Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy, Jaffe A. B. and Trajtenberg M., eds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2005), 403470.
Hall R. A.Framework Linking Intangible Resources and Capabilities to Sustainable Competitive Advantage.” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1993), 607618.
He Z.-L., and Wong P.-K.. “Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.” Organization Science, 15 (2004), 481494.
Heckman J. J.; Ichimura H.; and Todd P. E.. “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme.” Review of Economic Studies, 64 (1997), 605654.
Jaffe A. B.Characterizing the ‘Technological Position’ of Firms, with Application to Quantifying Technological Opportunity and Research Spillovers.” Research Policy, 18 (1989), 8797.
Jaffe A. B.The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process.” Research Policy, 29 (2000), 531557.
Katila R., and Ahuja G.. “Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction.” Academy of Management Journal, 45 (2002), 11831194.
King R., and Levine R.. “Finance, Entrepreneurship, and Growth: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 32 (1993), 513542.
Lanjouw J. O., and Schankerman M.. “Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators.” Economic Journal, 114 (2004), 441465.
Lavie D.; Stettner U.; and Tushman M.. “Exploration and Exploitation within and across Organizations.” Academy of Management Annals, 4 (2010), 109155.
Lerner J.; Sørensen M.; and Strömberg P.. “Private Equity and Long-Run Investment: The Case of Innovation.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 445477.
Levinthal D. A., and March J. G.. “The Myopia of Learning.” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1993), 95112.
Li G.-C.; Lai R.; D’Amour A.; Doolin D. M.; Sun Y.; Torvik V. I.; Yu A. Z.; and Fleming L.. “Disambiguation and Co-Authorship Networks of the U.S. Patent Inventor Database (1975–2010).” Research Policy, 43 (2014), 941955.
Lowry M.Why Does IPO Volume Fluctuate So Much?Journal of Financial Economics, 65 (2003), 340.
Maksimovic V.; Phillips G.; and Yang L.. “Private and Public Merger Wages.” Journal of Finance, 68 (2013), 21772217.
Malmendier U., and Tate G.. “CEO Overconfidence and Corporate Investment.” Journal of Finance, 60 (2005), 26612700.
Manso G.Motivating Innovation.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 18231860.
McGrath R. G.Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity and Managerial Oversight.” Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2001), 118131.
Nohria N., and Gulati R.. “Is Slack Good or Bad for Innovation?Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1996), 12451264.
Pagano M.; Panetta F.; and Zingales L.. “Why Do Companies Go Public? An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance, 53 (1998), 2764.
Peteraf M.The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View.” Strategic Management Journal, 14 (1993), 179191.
Porter M. E.Capital Disadvantage: America’s Failing Capital Investment System.” Harvard Business Review, 70 (1992), 6582.
Smith W. K., and Tushman M. L.. “Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams.” Organization Science, 16 (2005), 522536.
Stein J.Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia.” Journal of Political Economy, 96 (1988), 6180.
Stein J.Efficient Capital Market, Inefficient Firms: A Model of Myopic Corporate Behavior.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104 (1989), 655669.
Uotila J.; Maula M.; Keil T.; and Zahra S. A.. “Exploration, Exploitation, and Financial Performance: Analysis of S&P 500 Corporations.” Strategic Management Journal, 30 (2009), 221231.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
  • ISSN: 0022-1090
  • EISSN: 1756-6916
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 230 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 28th December 2017 - 18th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.