Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T02:48:59.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Evidence on the Robustness of the Day-of-the-Week Effect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Eric C. Chang ,
J. Michael Pinegar  and
R. Ravichandran
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Consistent with Connolly's (1989), (1991) evidence, this study finds that sample size and/or error term adjustments render U.S. day-of-the-week effects statistically insignificant. In contrast, day-of-the-week effects in seven European countries and in Canada and Hong Kong are robust to individual sample size or error term adjustments, and day-of-the-week effects in five European countries survive the simultaneous imposition of both types of adjustments. In most countries where day-of-the-week effects are robust, however, the effects are statistically significant in not more than two weeks out of the month. These findings are inconsistent with explanations of the day-of-the-week effect based on institutional differences or on the arrival of new information. Thus, in the absence of other potential explanations already dismissed by Jaffe and Westerfield (1985), evidence in this study further complicates the international day-of-the-week effect puzzle.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , December 1993 , pp. 497 - 513
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Admati, A. R., and Pfleiderer, P.. “Divide and Conquer: A Theory of Intraday and Day-of-the-Week Mean Effects.” Review of Financial Studies, 2 (1989), 189–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, A., and Tandon, K.. “Anomalies or Illusions? Evidence from Stock Markets in Eighteen Foreign Countries.” Journal of International Money and Finance, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Campbell, J. Y., and Hamao, Y.. “Predictable Stock Returns in the United States and Japan: A Study of Long-Term Capital Market Integration.” Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 43–69.Google Scholar
Cho, D. C; Eun, C. S.: and Senbet, L. W.. “International Arbitrage Pricing Theory: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Finance, 42 (1986), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, D., and Orcutt, G. H.. “Application of Least-Squares Regressions to Relationships Containing Auto-Correlated Error Terms.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44 (1949), 32–61.Google Scholar
Connolly, R. A. “An Examination of the Robustness of the Weekend Effect.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24 (06 1989), 133–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, R. A. “A Posterior Odds Analysis of the Weekend Effect.” Journal of Econometrics, 49 (1991), 51–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damodaran, A. “The Weekend Effect in Information Releases: A Study of Earnings and Dividend Announcements.” Review of Financial Studies, 2 (1989), 607–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eun, C. S., and Shim, S.. “International Transmission of Stock Market Movements.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24 (06 1989), 241–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, K. R. “Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect.” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (03 1980), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, M. R., and Hess, P.. “Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns.” Journal of Business, 54 (10 1980, 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamao, Y; Masulis, R.; and Ng., V. “Correlation in Price Changes and Volatility across International Stock Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 3 (1990), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. “A Transaction Data Study of Weekly and Intradaily Patterns of Stock Returns.” Journal of Financial Economics, 16 (1986), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, C. R. “The World Price of Covariance Risk.” Journal of Finance, 46 (1991), 111–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, J., and Westerfield, R.. “The Week-End Effect in Stock Returns: The International Evidence.” Journal of Finance, 41 (1985), 433–454.Google Scholar
Jaffe, J.; Westerfield, R.; and Ma., C. “A Twist on the Monday Effect in Stock Price: Evidence from the U.S. and Foreign Stock Markets.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 13 (1989), 641–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keim, D. B., and Stambaugh, R. F.. “A Further Investigation of the Weekend Effect in Stock Returns.” Journal of Finance, 39 (1984), 819–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Learner, E. E.Specification Searches: Ad-Hoc Inference with Non-Experimental Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons (1978).Google Scholar
Lindley, D. V. “A Statistical Paradox.” Biometrika, 44 (1957), 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McQueen, G. R., and Roley, V. V.. “Stock Prices, News, and Business Conditions.” Working Paper, Brigham Young Univ. (1992).Google Scholar
Porter, D. C. “The Probability of a Trade at the Ask: An Examination of Interday and Intraday Behavior.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27 (06 1992), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogalski, R. J. “New Findings Regarding Day-of-the-Week over Trading and Non-Trading Periods: A Note.” Journal of Finance, 39 (1984), 1603–1614.Google Scholar
Schatzberg, J. D., and Datta, P.. “The Weekend Effect and Corporate Dividend Announcements.” Journal of Financial Research, 15 (1992), 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solnik, B., and Bousquet, L.. “Day-of-the-Week Effect on the Paris Bourse.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 14 (1990), 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheatley, S. M. “Some Tests of International Equity Market Integration.” Journal of Financial Economics, 21 (1988), 177–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The 1991 Handbook of World Stock and Commodity Exchanges. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, Inc. (1991).Google Scholar
White, H. “A Heteroscedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroscedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (1980), 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, H., and Domowitz, I.. “Nonlinear Regressions with Dependent Observations.” Econometrica, 52 (1984), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, K. J., et al. SHAZAM User's Reference Manual Version 6.2. Quebec: McGraw Hill (1990).Google Scholar