Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-2p87r Total loading time: 0.488 Render date: 2021-10-16T08:43:46.532Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The Liquidity Effects of Official Bond Market Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2018

Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To “ensure depth and liquidity,” the European Central Bank intervened in sovereign debt markets through its Securities Markets Programme (SMP), providing a unique opportunity to estimate the effects of large-scale asset purchases on sovereign bond liquidity premia. From reduced-form estimates, we find robust, economically significant impact and lasting reductions in sovereign bonds’ liquidity premia in response to official purchases. We develop a search-based asset-pricing model to understand our empirical results. The theory implies that bond liquidity premia fall in response to both official purchases and rising sovereign default probabilities, as seen in the data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2018 

Footnotes

1

We thank an anonymous referee, Jean Barthelemy, Michael Bauer, Luca Benzoni, Stephen Brown (the editor), Christian Upper, Justin Wang, and seminar participants at the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, the European Central Bank, and the 2013 European Financial Management Association Annual Meetings for very helpful comments. Rebecca DeSimone provided outstanding research assistance for which we are grateful. All remaining errors are our own. The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors and should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or of any other employee of the Federal Reserve System.

References

Ammer, J., and Cai, F.. “Sovereign CDS and Bond Pricing Dynamics in Emerging Markets: Does the Cheapest-to-Deliver Option Matter?Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21 (2011), 369387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beber, A.; Brandt, M. W.; and Kavajecz, K. A.. “Flight-to-Quality or Flight-to-Liquidity? Evidence from the Euro-Area Bond Market.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 925957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, K.; Fleming, M. J.; Jackson, J. P.; Li, A.; and Sarkar, A.. “An Analysis of CDS Transactions: Implications for Public Reporting.” Staff Report No. 517, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (2011).Google Scholar
Christensen, J. H. E., and Rudebusch, G. D.. “The Response of Interest Rates to US and UK Quantitative Easing.” Economic Journal, 122 (2012), 385414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudert, V., and Gex, M.. “Credit Default Swap and Bond Markets: Which Leads the Other?Banque de France, Financial Stability Review, 14 (2010), 161167.Google Scholar
D’Amico, S.; English, W.; Lopez-Salido, D.; and Nelson, E.. “The Federal Reserve’s Large-Scale Asset Purchase Programs: Rationale and Effects.” Economic Journal, 122 (2012), 415446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Amico, S., and King, T. B.. “Flow and Stock Effects of Large-Scale Treasury Purchases: Evidence on the Importance of Local Supply.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 425448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pooter, M.; DeSimone, R.; Martin, R. F.; and Pruitt, S.. “Cheap Talk and the Efficacy of the ECB’s Securities Market Programme: Did Bond Purchases Matter?International Finance Discussion Paper, 1139 (2015), 176.Google Scholar
Diamond, P. A.Aggregate Demand Management in Search Equilibrium.” Journal of Political Economy, 90 (1982), 881–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D.“Defaultable Term Structure Models with Fractional Recovery of Par.” Working Paper, Stanford University (1998).Google Scholar
Duffie, D.Credit Swap Valuation.” Financial Analysts Journal, 55 (1999), 7387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D.; Garleanu, N.; and Pedersen, L. H.. “Over-the-Counter Markets.” Econometrica, 73 (2005), 18151847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D.; Garleanu, N.; and Pedersen, L. H.. “Valuation in Over-the-Counter Markets.” Review of Financial Studies, 20 (2007), 18651900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D., and Singleton, K. J.. “Modeling Term Structures of Defaultable Bonds.” Review of Financial Studies, 12 (1999), 687720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffie, D., and Sun, Y.. “Existence of Independent Random Matching.” Annals of Applied Probability, 17 (2007), 386419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ejsing, J. W., and Sihvonen, J.. “Liquidity Premia in German Government Bonds.” ECB Working Paper Series No. 1081 (2009), 1–44.Google Scholar
Eser, F., and Schwaab, B.. “Evaluating the Impact of Unconventional Monetary Policy Measures: Empirical Evidence from the ECB’s Securities Markets Programme.” Journal of Financial Economics, 119 (2016), 147167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldhutter, P.The Same Bond at Different Prices: Identifying Search Frictions and Selling Pressures.” Review of Financial Studies, 25 (2012), 11551206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontana, A., and Scheicher, M.. “An Analysis of Euro Area Sovereign CDS and Their Relation with Government Bonds.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 62 (2016), 126140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, J.; Raskin, M.; and Sack, B.. “The Financial Market Effects of the Federal Reserve’s Large-Scale Asset Purchases.” International Journal of Central Banking, 7 (2011), 343.Google Scholar
Ghysels, E.; Idier, J.; Manganelli, S.; and Vergote, O.. “A High Frequency Assessment of the ECB Securities Markets Programme.” ECB Working Paper Series No. 1642 (2014), 1–55.Google Scholar
Gürkaynak, R. S.; Sack, B.; and Wright, J. H.. “The U.S. Treasury Yield Curve: 1961 to the Present.” Journal of Monetary Economics, 54 (2007), 22912304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J., and Wu, C.. “The Effectiveness of Alternative Monetary Policy Tools in a Zero Lower Bound Environment.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 44 (2011), 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Z., and Milbradt, K.. “Endogenous Liquidity and Defaultable Debt.” Econometrica, 82 (2014), 14431508.Google Scholar
Joyce, M.; Lasaosa, A.; Stevens, I.; and Tong, M.. “The Financial Market Impact of Quantitative Easing in the United Kingdom.” International Journal of Central Banking, 7 (2011), 113161.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, A., and Vissing-Jorgensen, A.. “The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Interest Rates.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (2011), 215287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagos, R., and Rocheteau, G.. “Liquidity in Asset Markets with Search Frictions.” Econometrica, 77 (2009), 403426.Google Scholar
Leland, H., and Toft, K.. “Optimal Capital Structure, Endogenous Bankruptcy, and the Term Structure of Credit Spreads.” Journal of Finance, 51 (1996), 9871019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monfort, A., and Renne, J.-P.. “Decomposing Euro-Area Sovereign Spreads: Credit and Liquidity Risks.” Review of Finance, 18 (2014), 21032151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. R., and Siegel, A. F.. “Parsimonious Modeling of Yield Curves.” Journal of Business, 60 (1987), 473489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, J., and Singleton, K. J.. “Default and Recovery Implicit in the Term Structure of Sovereign CDS Spreads.” Journal of Finance, 63 (2008), 23452384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebesch, C., and Zettelmeyer, J.. “ECB Interventions in Distressed Sovereign Debt Markets: The Case of Greek Bonds.” Tech. Rep. 4731, CESifo Working Paper Series (2014).Google Scholar
White, H.A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, 48 (1980), 817838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

De Pooter et al. supplementary material

Internet Appendix

Download De Pooter et al. supplementary material(File)
File 306 KB
You have Access
16
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Liquidity Effects of Official Bond Market Intervention
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Liquidity Effects of Official Bond Market Intervention
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Liquidity Effects of Official Bond Market Intervention
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *