Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Long-Run Investment Decisions, Operating Performance, and Shareholder Value Creation of Firms Adopting Compensation Plans Based on Economic Profits

  • Chris E. Hogan (a1) and Craig M. Lewis (a2)

For firms that adopted economic profit plans between 1983 and 1996, we document changes in investment behavior that lead to improvements in operating performance and growth opportunities relative to these firms' past performance. The improvements, however, are similar to those realized by a set of non-adopting control firms that are selected on the basis of a logistic regression model of adoption choice. We then consider the possibility that some firms are better candidates for economic profit plans than others and classify adopters according to whether they make anticipated or surprising choices based on the adoption choice model. We find that anticipated adopters make changes in investment behavior that reduce invested capital and allow them to become more profitable than a sample of control firms that were expected to adopt but chose to continue using a traditional plan. A similar analysis of surprise adopters does not reveal significant performance differences relative to a sample of anticipated non-adopters. The classification analysis suggests that economic profit plans work best for firms that are expected to adopt such plans based on pre-adoption operating, organizational, financial, and compensation characteristics.

Hide All
Balachandran S. V.How Does Residual Income Affect Investment? The Role of Prior Performance Measures.” Working Paper, Columbia Univ. (2003).
Barber B., and Lyon J.. “Detecting Abnormal Operating Performance: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.” Journal of Financial Economics, 41 (1996), 359399.
Biddle G. C.; Bowen R. M.; and Wallace J. S.. “Does EVA Beat Earnings? Evidence on Associations with Stock Returns and Firm Values.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1997), 301336.
Biddle G. C.; Bowen R. M.; and Wallace J. S.. “Evidence on EVA.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12 (1999), 6979.
Charoenrook A.The Role of Capital Structure in Tests of Asset-Pricing Models.” Working Paper, Vanderbilt Univ. (2002).
Cosslett S. R.Maximum Likelihood Estimator for Choice-Based Samples.” Econometrica, 49 (1981), 12891316.
Dehejia R. H., and Wahba S.. “Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies.” Working Paper 6829, National Bureau of Economic Research (1998).
Garvey G. T., and Milbourn T. T.. “EVA versus Earnings: Does it Matter Which Is More Highly Correlated with Stock Returns?Journal of Accounting Research, 38 (2000 Supplement), 209243.
Hamilton R.An Introduction to Merchandize. Edinburgh (1777).
Ittner C. D., and Larcker D. F.. “Assessing Empirical Research in Managerial Accounting: A Value Based Management Perspective.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32 (2001), 349410.
Jung K.; Kim Y.; and Stulz R.. “Timing, Investment Opportunities, Managerial Discretion, and the Security Issuance Decision.” Journal of Financial Economics, 42 (1996), 159185.
Lehn K., and Makhija A.. “EVA, Accounting Profits, and CEO Turnover: An Empirical Examination 1985–1984.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 10 (1997), 9097.
Manski C. F., and Lerman S. R.. “The Estimation of Choice Probabilities from Choice Based Samples.” Econometrica, 45 (1977), 19771988.
Murphy K.Executive Compensation.” Working Paper, Univ. of Southern California (1998).
Myers S., and Majluf N.. “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have.” Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (1984), 187221.
Rosenbaum P., and Rubin D.. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Casual Effects.“ Biometrica, 70 (1983), 4155.
Wallace J. S.Adopting Residual Income-Based Compensation Plans: Do You Get What You Pay For?Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1997), 275300.
Villalonga B.Does Diversification Cause the 'Diversification Discount'?Financial Management, 33 (2004), 529.
Zimmerman J.EVA and Divisional Performance Measurement: Capturing Synergies and Other Issues.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 10 (1997): 98109.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
  • ISSN: 0022-1090
  • EISSN: 1756-6916
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-financial-and-quantitative-analysis
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 65 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 226 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.