Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T05:43:46.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Note on the Representation of Bounded Utility Functions Defined on [a, ∞)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

Extract

The structure and analytical representation of investors' utility-of-wealth functions has long been of interest in portfolio theory. In proposing convenient analytical utility functions most economists have used (i) constant elasticity (power) functions, (ii) the negative exponential function. Both (i) and (ii), of course, restrict the preference structure; Moreover, one may object to (i) because such functions are not uniformly bounded on [0, ∞). And, as has been shown by Arrow [1], this is undesirable in an axiomatic system. The negative exponential function has no such disadvantage, but objections may be raised on empirical grounds. Thus, no simple convenient specification of bounded utility functions on [a, ∞) is available. In fact, even polynomials in wealth of arbitrary order are restrictive since they immediately impose the requirement that moments of wealth are finite. (If the polynomial is of order n, then the nth moment must be finite.)

Type
Communications
Copyright
Copyright © School of Business Administration, University of Washington 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Arrow, K.Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Helsinki: Yrjo Johnssonin Saatio, 1965.Google Scholar
[2]Feller, W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, vol. 2, 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1966.Google Scholar
[3]Ohlson, J.Quadratic Approximations of the Portfolio Selection Problem When the Means and Variances of Returns Are Infinite.” University of California, Berkeley, School of Business Administration, September 1974.Google Scholar
[4]Pratt, J.Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large.” Econometrica, vol. 32 (1964), pp. 122136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar