Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-mhzq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-05T01:24:07.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zeroing In on the Expected Returns of Anomalies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2022

Andrew Y. Chen
Affiliation:
Federal Reserve Board Research and Statistics andrew.y.chen@frb.gov
Mihail Velikov*
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University Smeal College of Business
*
velikov@psu.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We zero in on the expected returns of long-short portfolios based on 204 stock market anomalies by accounting for i) effective bid–ask spreads, ii) post-publication effects, and iii) the modern era of trading technology that began in the early 2000s. Net of these effects, the average anomaly’s expected return is a measly 4 bps per month. The strongest anomalies net, at best, 10 bps after controlling for data mining. Several methods for combining anomalies net around 20 bps. Expected returns are negligible despite cost mitigations that produce impressive net returns in-sample and the omission of additional trading costs, like price impact.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington