Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 462
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Boudet, J. Lévêque, E. Borgnat, P. Cahuzac, A. and Jacob, M.C. 2016. A Kalman filter adapted to the estimation of mean gradients in the large-eddy simulation of unsteady turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, Vol. 127, p. 65.

    Chapelier, J.-B. and Lodato, G. 2016. A spectral-element dynamic model for the Large-Eddy simulation of turbulent flows. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 321, p. 279.

    Cintolesi, Carlo Petronio, Andrea and Armenio, Vincenzo 2016. Large-eddy simulation of thin film evaporation and condensation from a hot plate in enclosure: First order statistics. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 101, p. 1123.

    De Ridder, Jeroen Degroote, Joris Tichelen, Katrien Van Schuurmans, Paul and Vierendeels, Jan 2016. Predicting turbulence-induced vibration in axial annular flow by means of large-eddy simulations. Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 61, p. 115.

    Di, Shengbin Xu, Ji Chang, Qi and Ge, Wei 2016. Numerical simulation of stirred tanks using a hybrid immersed-boundary method. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering,

    Doubrawa, Paula Barthelmie, Rebecca J. Wang, Hui and Churchfield, Matthew J. 2016. A stochastic wind turbine wake model based on new metrics for wake characterization. Wind Energy,

    Giometto, M. G. Christen, A. Meneveau, C. Fang, J. Krafczyk, M. and Parlange, M. B. 2016. Spatial Characteristics of Roughness Sublayer Mean Flow and Turbulence Over a Realistic Urban Surface. Boundary-Layer Meteorology,

    Goodfriend, Elijah Katopodes Chow, Fotini Vanella, Marcos and Balaras, Elias 2016. Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow Through an Array of Cubes with Local Grid Refinement. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, Vol. 159, Issue. 2, p. 285.

    Holzäpfel, Frank Tchipev, Nikola and Stephan, Anton 2016. Wind Impact on Single Vortices and Counterrotating Vortex Pairs in Ground Proximity. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion,

    Jiang, Zhou Xiao, Zuoli Shi, Yipeng and Chen, Shiyi 2016. Constrained large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow and heat transfer in a stationary ribbed duct. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, Vol. 26, Issue. 3/4, p. 1069.

    Jiao, Jianying and Zhang, Ye 2016. Multiscale subgrid models of large eddy simulation for turbulent flows. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, Vol. 26, Issue. 5, p. 1380.

    Lalit, Harshad Kapaku, Robert Rankin, Brent A. Mueller, Michael E. and Gore, Jay P. 2016. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.

    LARSSON, Johan KAWAI, Soshi BODART, Julien and BERMEJO-MORENO, Ivan 2016. Large eddy simulation with modeled wall-stress: recent progress and future directions. Mechanical Engineering Reviews, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 15-00418.

    Mokhtarpoor, Reza Heinz, Stefan Stoellinger, Michael K. and Balakumar, Ponnampalam 2016. 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting.

    Ottolenghi, L. Adduce, C. Inghilesi, R. Roman, F. and Armenio, V. 2016. Mixing in lock-release gravity currents propagating up a slope. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 28, Issue. 5, p. 056604.

    Ottolenghi, Luisa Adduce, Claudia Inghilesi, Roberto Armenio, Vincenzo and Roman, Federico 2016. Entrainment and mixing in unsteady gravity currents. Journal of Hydraulic Research, p. 1.

    Rahromostaqim, M. Posa, A. and Balaras, E. 2016. Numerical Investigation of the Performance of Pitching Airfoils at High Amplitudes. AIAA Journal, Vol. 54, Issue. 8, p. 2221.

    Rouhi, A. Piomelli, U. and Geurts, B. J. 2016. Dynamic subfilter-scale stress model for large-eddy simulations. Physical Review Fluids, Vol. 1, Issue. 4,

    Stephan, Anton and Holzäpfel, Frank N. 2016. 8th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference.

    Taghinia, Javad Rahman, Md Mizanur and Tse, Tim K.T. 2016. Assessment of zero-equation SGS models for simulating indoor environment. Heat and Mass Transfer,

  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Volume 319
  • July 1996, pp. 353-385

A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence

  • Charles Meneveau (a1), Thomas S. Lund (a2) and William H. Cabot (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2006

The dynamic model for large-eddy simulation of turbulence samples information from the resolved velocity field in order to optimize subgrid-scale model coefficients. When the method is used in conjunction with the Smagorinsky eddy-viscosity model, and the sampling process is formulated in a spatially local fashion, the resulting coefficient field is highly variable and contains a significant fraction of negative values. Negative eddy viscosity leads to computational instability and as a result the model is always augmented with a stabilization mechanism. In most applications the model is stabilized by averaging the relevant equations over directions of statistical homogeneity. While this approach is effective, and is consistent with the statistical basis underlying the eddy-viscosity model, it is not applicable to complex-geometry inhomogeneous flows. Existing local formulations, intended for inhomogeneous flows, are most commonly stabilized by artificially constraining the coefficient to be positive. In this paper we introduce a new dynamic model formulation, that combines advantages of the statistical and local approaches. We propose to accumulate the required averages over flow pathlines rather than over directions of statistical homogeneity. This procedure allows the application of the dynamic model with averaging to in-homogeneous flows in complex geometries. We analyse direct numerical simulation data to document the effects of such averaging on the Smagorinsky coefficient. The characteristic Lagrangian time scale over which the averaging is performed is chosen based on measurements of the relevant Lagrangian autocorrelation functions, and on the requirement that the model be purely dissipative, guaranteeing numerical stability when coupled with the Smagorinsky model. The formulation is tested in forced and decaying isotropic turbulence and in fully developed and transitional channel flow. In homogeneous flows, the results are similar to those of the volume-averaged dynamic model, while in channel flow, the predictions are slightly superior to those of the spatially (planar) averaged dynamic model. The relationship between the model and vortical structures in isotropic turbulence, as well as ejection events in channel flow, is investigated. Computational overhead is kept small (about 10% above the CPU requirements of the spatially averaged dynamic model) by using an approximate scheme to advance the Lagrangian tracking through first-order Euler time integration and linear interpolation in space.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Fluid Mechanics
  • ISSN: 0022-1120
  • EISSN: 1469-7645
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *