Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-cxxrm Total loading time: 0.38 Render date: 2021-12-02T12:27:51.794Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Complex singularities near the intersection of a free surface and wall. Part 1. Vertical jets and rising bubbles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2018

Thomas G. J. Chandler
Affiliation:
Oxford Centre for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
Philippe H. Trinh*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: p.trinh@bath.ac.uk

Abstract

It is known that in steady-state potential flows, the separation of a gravity-driven free surface from a solid exhibits a number of peculiar characteristics. For example, it can be shown that the fluid must separate from the body so as to form one of three possible in-fluid angles: (i) $180^{\circ }$, (ii) $120^{\circ }$ or (iii) an angle such that the surface is locally perpendicular to the direction of gravity. These necessary separation conditions were notably remarked upon by Dagan & Tulin (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 51 (3), 1972, pp. 529–543) in the context of ship hydrodynamics, but they are of crucial importance in many potential-flow applications. It is not particularly well understood why there is such a drastic change in the local separation behaviours when the global flow is altered. The question that motivates this work is the following: outside of a formal balance-of-terms argument, why must cases (i)–(iii) occur and furthermore, what are the connections between them? In this work, we seek to explain the transitions between the three cases in terms of the singularity structure of the associated solutions once they are extended into the complex plane. A numerical scheme is presented for the analytic continuation of a vertical jet (or alternatively a rising bubble). It will be shown that the transition between the three cases can be predicted by observing the coalescence of singularities as the speed of the jet is modified. A scaling law is derived for the coalescence rate of singularities.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, G. R. 1990 Singularities in the complex physical plane. In Hyperbolic Problems (ed. Engquist, B. & Gustafson, B.). Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Baker, G. R. & Xie, C. 2011 Singularities in the complex physical plane for deep water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 685, 83116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhoff, G. & Carter, D. 1957 Rising plane bubbles. J. Ration. Mech. Anal. 6, 769779.Google Scholar
Chandler, T. G. J. & Trinh, P. H.2018 Complex singularities near the intersection of a free surface and wall. Part 2. Angled nozzles. (In preparation.)Google Scholar
Chapman, S. J. 1999 On the role of Stokes lines in the selection of Saffman–Taylor fingers with small surface tension. Eur. J. Appl. Maths 10 (6), 513534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combescot, R., Hakim, V., Dombre, T., Pomeau, Y. & Pumir, A. 1986 Shape selection of Saffman–Taylor fingers. Phys. Rev. A 56 (19), 20362039.Google ScholarPubMed
Couët, B. & Strumolo, G. S. 1987 The effects of surface tension and tube inclination on a two-dimensional rising bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 184, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowley, S. J., Baker, G. R. & Tanveer, S. 1999 On the formation of moore curvature singularities in vortex sheets. J. Fluid Mech. 378, 233267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crew, S. C. & Trinh, P. H. 2016 New singularities for Stokes waves. J. Fluid Mech. 798, 256283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, G. & Tulin, M. P. 1972 Two-dimensional free-surface gravity flow past blunt bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 51 (3), 529543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daripa, P. 2000 A computational study of rising plane Taylor bubbles. J. Comput. Phys. 157 (1), 120142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrow, D. E. & Tuck, E. O. 1995 Further studies of stern wavemaking. J. Austral. Math. Soc. B 36, 424437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garabedian, P. R. 1957 On steady-state bubbles generated by Taylor instability. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 241, 423431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garabedian, P. R. 1985 A remark about pointed bubbles. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths 38 (5), 609612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, K. H. M.1986 Numerical solution of quadratically non-linear boundary value problems using integral equation techniques with application to nozzle and wall flows. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Goh, K. H. M. & Tuck, E. O. 1985 Thick waterfalls from horizontal slots. J. Engng Maths 19 (4), 341349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golubeva, N.2003 Singularities in the spatial complex plane for vortex sheets and thin vortex layers. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Grant, M. A. 1973 The singularity at the crest of a finite amplitude progressive Stokes wave. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 257262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. & Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. 1993 Two-dimensional jets falling from funnels and nozzles. Phys. Fluids 5 (10), 24542460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Fox, M. J. H. 1978 Theory of the almost-highest wave. Part 2. Matching and analytic extension. J. Fluid Mech. 85, 769786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCue, S. W. & Forbes, L. K. 1999 Bow and stern flows with constant vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 399, 277300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCue, S. W. & Forbes, L. K. 2002 Free-surface flows emerging from beneath a semi-infinite plate with constant vorticity. J. Fluid Mech. 461, 387407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiron, D. I., Baker, G. R. & Orszag, S. A. 1982 Analytic structure of vortex sheet dynamics. Part 1. Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. J. Fluid Mech. 114, 283298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milewski, P., Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. & Keller, J. B. 1998 Singularities on free surfaces of fluid flows. Stud. Appl. Maths 100 (3), 245267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, D. W. 1979 The spontaneous appearance of a singularity in the shape of an evolving vortex sheet. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 365 (1720), 105119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A. C. 1974 Expansions for the shape of maximum amplitude stokes waves. J. Fluid Mech. 66 (02), 261265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanveer, S. 1991 Singularities in water waves and Rayleigh–Taylor instablity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 435, 137158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinh, P. H. 2016 A topological study of gravity waves generated by moving bodies using the method of steepest descents. Proc. R. Soc. Lond A 472, 20150833.Google ScholarPubMed
Trinh, P. H. & Chapman, S. J. 2014 The wake of a two-dimensional ship in the low-speed limit: results for multi-cornered hulls. J. Fluid Mech. 741, 492513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinh, P. H., Chapman, S. J. & Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. 2011 Do waveless ships exist? Results for single-cornered hulls. J. Fluid Mech. 685, 413439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, E. O. 1987 Efflux from a slit in a vertical wall. J. Fluid Mech. 176, 253264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, E. O. & Roberts, A. J. 1997 Bow-like free surfaces under gravity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 355, 655677.Google Scholar
Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. 1984a Bubbles rising in a tube and jets falling from a nozzle. Phys. Fluids 27 (5), 10901093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. 1984b Rising bubbles in a two-dimensional tube with surface tension. Phys. Fluids 27 (11), 26042607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. 1991 Axisymmetric jet falling from a vertical nozzle and bubble rising in a tube of circular cross section. Phys. Fluids A 3 (2), 258262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. 2010 Gravity-Capillary Free-Surface Flows. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanden-Broeck, J.-M. & Tuck, E. O. 1994 Flow near the intersection of a free surface with a vertical wall. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 54 (1), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Complex singularities near the intersection of a free surface and wall. Part 1. Vertical jets and rising bubbles
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Complex singularities near the intersection of a free surface and wall. Part 1. Vertical jets and rising bubbles
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Complex singularities near the intersection of a free surface and wall. Part 1. Vertical jets and rising bubbles
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *