Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T11:31:22.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of tunnel blockage and aspect ratio on the mean flow past a circular cylinder with Reynolds numbers between 104 and 105

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

G. S. West  and
C. J. Apelt
G. S. West
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia
C. J. Apelt
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Queensland, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results are presented of a series of experiments which were carried out with great care to produce accurate, comparable results in which the relatively small changes in the flow past a circular cylinder associated with varying blockage ratios can be clearly distinguished. The experiments cover a range of blockage from 2 to 16% and of aspect ratios from 4 to 10. End plates were fitted to the cylinders in all experiments.

For blockage ratios less than 6%, it is shown that the effects of blockage on pressure distribution and the drag coefficient are small and that the Strouhal number is unaffected by blockage. For blockage ratios in the range 6–16%, there is considerable distortion of the flow due to blockage and the effects are complex. The pressure distribution is of a different form and the Strouhal number changes. Hoevever, conflicting influences result in a blocked drag coefficient which is not very different from that at no blockage. Reduction in aspect ratio has effects on drag coefficient and on base pressure coefficient which are similar to those associated with increase in blockage ratio.

It is concluded that blockage correction procedures based on the momentum method and on the image method are unsatisfactory in their prediction of the unblocked drag coefficient but the momentum method predicts the unblocked base pressure coefficient quite well.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 114 , January 1982 , pp. 361 - 377
Copyright
© 1972 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, H. J. & Vincenti, W. G. 1944 Wall interference in a two-dimensional-flow wind tunnel, with consideration of the effect of compressibility. N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 782.Google Scholar
Fabell, C., Carrasquel, S., Guven, O. & Patel, O. C. 1977 Effect of wind-tunnel walls on the flow past circular cylinders and cooling tower models. Trans. A.S.M.E. 1 J. Fluids Engng 99, 470–479.Google Scholar
Gerrard, J. H. 1965 A disturbance sensitive Reynolds number range of the flow past a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 187–196.Google Scholar
Lienhard, J. H. 1966 Synopsis of lift, drag, and vortex frequency data for rigid circular cylinders. Wash. State Univ. Bull. no. 300.Google Scholar
Maskell, E. C. 1963 A theory of the blockage effects on bluff bodies and stalled wings in a closed wind tunnel. Aero Res. Counc. R. & M. no. 3400.Google Scholar
Modi, V. J. & El-Sherbiny, S. 1971 Effect of wall confinement on aerodynamics of stationary circular cylinders. Symp. on Wind Effects on Buildings and Structures, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Morkovin, M. V. 1964 Flow around a circular cylinder — a kaleidoscope of challenging fluid phenomena. A.S.M.E. Symp. on Fully Separated Flows, p. 102.Google Scholar
Pankhurst, R. C. & Holder, D. W. 1952 Wind Tunnel Technique. Pitman.
Roshko, A. & Fiszdon, W. 1969 On the persistence of transition in the near-wake. Problems of Hydrodynamics and Continuum Mechanics. SIAM Philadelphia.
Stansby, P. K. 1974 The effects of end plates on the base pressure coefficient of a circular cylinder. Aero. J. 78, 36–37.Google Scholar
West, G. S. 1981 An experimental study of blockage effects on some bluff profiles. Univ. of Queensland, Research Rep. no. 23.Google Scholar