Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-lm65w Total loading time: 0.006 Render date: 2025-07-23T13:42:21.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental investigation of two-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor instability with controllable initial conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2025

Yu Liang Open the ORCID record for Yu Liang [Opens in a new window]  and
Xisheng Luo Open the ORCID record for Xisheng Luo [Opens in a new window]
Yu Liang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, PR China
Xisheng Luo*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of High Temperature Gas Dynamics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, PR China Advanced Propulsion Laboratory, Department of Modern Mechanics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, PR China
*
Corresponding authors: Yu Liang, liangyu@imech.ac.cn; Xisheng Luo, xluo@ustc.edu.cn
Corresponding authors: Yu Liang, liangyu@imech.ac.cn; Xisheng Luo, xluo@ustc.edu.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experimental investigation of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability (RTI) and its dependence on initial conditions has been challenging, primarily due to the difficulty of creating a well-defined gaseous interface. To address this, a novel soap film technique was developed to create a discontinuous two-dimensional SF$_6$air interface with precisely controlled initial conditions. High-order modes were superimposed on a long-wavelength perturbation to study the influence of initial conditions on RTI evolution. Experiments conducted at Atwood numbers ranging from 0.26 to 0.66 revealed that bubble growth shows a weak dependence on both initial conditions and Atwood numbers, whereas spike growth is more influenced by these factors. Spike growth accelerates as the wavenumber of the imposed high-order modes decreases and/or the Atwood number increases. To quantify these effects, a variation on the previously developed potential flow model was applied, capturing the suppression of high-order modes and Atwood number dependence on RTI growth. In turbulent flow, the self-similar factors of bubbles and spikes exhibit minimal sensitivity to initial conditions. However, in relation to the Atwood number, the self-similar factors of bubbles (or spikes) demonstrate negligible (or significant) dependence. Comparisons with literature revealed that two-dimensional flows yield lower self-similar factors than three-dimensional flows. Furthermore, the discontinuity of the initial interface in this study, achieved through the soap film technique, results in faster spike growth compared with previous studies involving a diffusive initial interface. These findings provide critical insights into the nonlinear dynamics of RTI and underscore the importance of well-characterised initial conditions in experimental studies.

JFM classification

Convection: Buoyancy-driven instability Instability: Instability

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 1015 , 25 July 2025 , A10
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Akula, B. & Ranjan, D. 2016 Dynamics of buoyancy-driven flows at moderately high Atwood numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 795, 313–355.10.1017/jfm.2016.199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnett, D. 2000 The role of mixing in astrophysics. Astrophys. J. 127 (2), 213–217.10.1086/313364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A., Kraft, W.N. & Andrews, M.J. 2010 Detailed measurements of a statistically steady Rayleigh–Taylor mixing layer from small to high Atwood numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 127–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betti, R. & Hurricane, O.A. 2016 Inertial-confinement fusion with lasers. Nat. Phys. 12 (5), 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkhoff, G. 1954 Taylor instability and laminar mixing, Tech. Rep. LA-1862. Los Alamos National Lab (LANL).Google Scholar
Cabot, W. 2006 Comparison of two- and three-dimensional simulations of miscible Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 18 (4), 045101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabot, W. & Zhou, Y. 2013 Statistical measurements of scaling and anisotropy of turbulent flows induced by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 25 (1), 015107.10.1063/1.4774338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couder, Y., Chomaz, J.M. & Rabaud, M. 1989 On the hydrodynamics of soap films. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 37 (1-3), 384–405.10.1016/0167-2789(89)90144-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalziel, S.B., Linden, P.F. & Youngs, D.L. 1999 Self-similarity and internal structure of turbulence induced by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 399, 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimonte, G. 2004 Dependence of turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability on initial perturbations. Phys. Rev. E 69 (5), 056305.10.1103/PhysRevE.69.056305CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimonte, G. & Schneider, M. 1996 Turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability experiments with variable acceleration. Phys. Rev. E 54 (4), 3740–3743.10.1103/PhysRevE.54.3740CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimonte, G. & Schneider, M. 2000 Density ratio dependence of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing for sustained and impulsive acceleration histories. Phys. Fluids 12 (2), 304–321.10.1063/1.870309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.E., Harlow, F.H. & Hirt, C.W. 1962 Effects of diffusion on interface instability between gases. Phys. Fluids 5 (4), 417–425.10.1063/1.1706634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glimm, J., Cheng, B., Sharp, D.H. & Kaman, T. 2020 A crisis for the verification and validation of turbulence simulations. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 404, 132346.10.1016/j.physd.2020.132346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glimm, J., Sharp, D.H., Kaman, T. & Lim, H. 2013 New directions for Rayleigh–Taylor mixing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371 (2003), 201201832003.10.1098/rsta.2012.0183CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goncharov, V.N. 2002 Analytical model of nonlinear, single-mode, classical Rayleigh–Taylor instability at arbitrary Atwood numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (13), 134502.10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.134502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haan, S.W. 1989 Onset of nonlinear saturation for Rayleigh–Taylor growth in the presence of a full spectrum of modes. Phys. Rev. A 39 (11), 5812–5825.10.1103/PhysRevA.39.5812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haan, S.W. 1991 Weakly nonlinear hydrodynamic instabilities in inertial fusion. Phys. Fluids B 3 (8), 2349–2355.10.1063/1.859603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, X., Chen, S. & Zhang, R. 1999 A lattice Boltzmann scheme for incompressible multiphase flow and its application in simulation of Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Comput. Phys. 152 (2), 642–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layzer, D. 1955 On the instability of superposed fluids in a gravitational field. Astrophys. J. 122, 1–12.10.1086/146048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, H., Hu, X., Huang, X. & Xu, J. 2019 a Direct numerical simulations of multi-mode immiscible Rayleigh–Taylor instability with high Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 31 (11), 112104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Alkindi, A., Alzeyoudi, K., Liu, L., Ali, M. & Masmoudi, N. 2024 Experimental investigation of three-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor instability of a gaseous interface. J. Fluid Mech. 994, A7.10.1017/jfm.2024.754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Liu, L., Zhai, Z., Ding, J., Si, T. & Luo, X. 2021 Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on two-dimensional multi-mode interfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 928, A37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Y., Zhai, Z., Ding, J. & Luo, X. 2019 b Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on a quasi-single-mode interface. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 729–751.10.1017/jfm.2019.416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, P.F., Redondo, J.M. & Youngs, D.L. 1994 Molecular mixing in Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 265, 97–124.10.1017/S0022112094000777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindl, J., Landen, O., Edwards, J., Moses, E.D & team, N.I.C. 2014 Review of the National Ignition Campaign 2009–2012. Phys. Plasmas 21 (2), 020501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, C., Zhang, Y. & Xiao, Z. 2023 A unified theoretical model for spatiotemporal development of Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov fingers. J. Fluid Mech. 954, A13.10.1017/jfm.2022.1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, L., Liang, Y., Ding, J., Liu, N. & Luo, X. 2018 An elaborate experiment on the single-mode Richtmyer–Meshkov instability. J. Fluid Mech. 853, R2.10.1017/jfm.2018.628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livescu, D., Ristorcelli, J.R., Petersen, M.R. & Gore, R.A. 2010 New phenomena in variable-density Rayleigh–Taylor turbulence. Phys. Scr. T142 (T142), 014015.10.1088/0031-8949/2010/T142/014015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, X., Liu, L., Liang, Y., Ding, J. & Wen, C.Y. 2020 Richtmyer–Meshkov instability on a dual-mode interface. J. Fluid Mech. 905, A5.10.1017/jfm.2020.732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, K.O. 1982 Normal modes and symmetries of the Rayleigh–Taylor instability in stratified fluids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (19), 1365–1368.10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikaelian, K.O. 1998 Analytic approach to nonlinear Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (3), 508–511.10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueschke, N.J. 2008 Experimental and numerical study of molecular mixing dynamics in Rayleigh–Taylor unstable flows. Ph.D. thesis, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
Müller, B. 2020 Hydrodynamics of core-collapse supernovae and their progenitors. Living Rev. Comput. Astrophys. 6 (1), 3.10.1007/s41115-020-0008-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, D.H. & Jacobs, J.W. 2009 Experimental study of Rayleigh–Taylor instability with a complex initial perturbation. Phys. Fluids 21 (3), 034103.10.1063/1.3085811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oron, D., Arazi, L., Kartoon, D., Rikanati, A., Alon, U. & Shvarts, D. 2001 Dimensionality dependence of the Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability late-time scaling laws. Phys. Plasmas 8 (6), 2883–2889.10.1063/1.1362529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaprabhu, P., Dimonte, G. & Andrews, M.J. 2005 A numerical study of the influence of initial perturbations on the turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 536, 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramaprabhu, P., Dimonte, G., Young, Y.-N., Calder, A.C. & Fryxell, B. 2006 Limits of the potential flow approach to the single-mode Rayleigh–Taylor problem. Phys. Rev. E 74 (6), 066308.10.1103/PhysRevE.74.066308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayleigh, L. 1883, Investigation of the character of the equilibrium of an incompressible heavy fluid of variable density. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 14, 170–177.Google Scholar
Read, K.I. 1984 Experimental investigation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 12 (1–3), 45–58.10.1016/0167-2789(84)90513-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, M.S. & Jacobs, J.W. 2016 The effects of forced small-wavelength, finite-bandwidth initial perturbations and miscibility on the turbulent Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 787, 50–83.10.1017/jfm.2015.599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, D.H. 1984 An overview of Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 12 (1), 3–18.10.1016/0167-2789(84)90510-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeeton, V.S. & Youngs, D.L. 1987 Experimental investigation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability, iii. Tech. Rep. AWRE Report, 35/87. Atomic Weapons Establishment.Google Scholar
Sohn, S.I. 2003 Simple potential-flow model of Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities for all density ratios. Phys. Rev. E 67 (2), 026301.10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026301CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, G. 1950 The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. I. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Math. Phys. Sci. 201 (1065), 192–196.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J.P. & Jacobs, J.W. 2007 Experimental study of the single-mode three-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 19 (12), 124102.10.1063/1.2813548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. 1984 Numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 12 (1-3), 32–44.10.1016/0167-2789(84)90512-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. 1989 Modelling turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenom. 37 (1-3), 270–287.10.1016/0167-2789(89)90135-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. 1991 Three-dimensional numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 3 (5), 1312–1320.10.1063/1.858059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngs, D.L. 2013 The density ratio dependence of self-similar Rayleigh–Taylor mixing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 371 (2003), 20120173.10.1098/rsta.2012.0173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Q. & Guo, W. 2016 Universality of finger growth in two-dimensional Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instabilities with all density ratios. J. Fluid Mech. 786, 47–61.10.1017/jfm.2015.641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 a Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. I. Phys. Rep. 720-722, 1–136.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y. 2017 b Rayleigh–Taylor and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability induced flow, turbulence, and mixing. II. Phys. Rep. 723-725, 1–160.Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Clark, T.T., Clark, D.S., Glendinning, S.S., Skinner, A.A., Huntington, C., Hurricane, O.A., Dimits, A.M. & Remington, B.A. 2019 Turbulent mixing and transition criteria of flows induced by hydrodynamic instabilities. Phys. Plasmas 26 (8), 080901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar