Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-dknvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-22T15:47:59.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinematic simulation of homogeneous turbulence by unsteady random Fourier modes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. C. H. Fung
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
N. A. Malik
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
R. J. Perkins
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK

Abstract

The velocity field of homogeneous isotropic turbulence is simulated by a large number (38–1200) of random Fourier modes varying in space and time over a large number (> 100) of realizations. They are chosen so that the flow field has certain properties, namely (i) it satisfies continuity, (ii) the two-point Eulerian spatial spectra have a known form (e.g. the Kolmogorov inertial subrange), (iii) the time dependence is modelled by dividing the turbulence into large- and small-scales eddies, and by assuming that the large eddies advect the small eddies which also decorrelate as they are advected, (iv) the amplitudes of the large- and small-scale Fourier modes are each statistically independent and each Gaussian. The structure of the velocity field is found to be similar to that computed by direct numerical simulation with the same spectrum, although this simulation underestimates the lengths of tubes of intense vorticity.

Some new results and concepts have been obtained using this kinematic simulation: (a) for the inertial subrange (which cannot yet be simulated by other means) the simulation confirms the form of the Eulerian frequency spectrum $\phi^{\rm E}_{11} = C^{\rm E}\epsilon^{\frac{2}{3}}U^{\frac{2}{3}}_0\omega^{-\frac{5}{3}}$, where ε,U0,ω are the rate of energy dissipation per unit mass, large-scale r.m.s. velocity, and frequency. For isotropic Gaussian large-scale turbulence at very high Reynolds number, CE ≈ 0.78, which is close to the computed value of 0.82; (b) for an observer moving with the large eddies the ‘Eulerian—Lagrangian’ spectrum is ϕEL11 = CELεω−2, where CEL ≈ 0.73; (c) for an observer moving with a fluid particle the Lagrangian spectrum ϕL11 = CLεω−2, where CL ≈ 0.8, a value consistent with the atmospheric turbulence measurements by Hanna (1981) and approximately equal to CEL; (d) the mean-square relative displacement of a pair of particles 〈Δ2〉 tends to the Richardson (1926) and Obukhov (1941) form 〈Δ2〉 = GΔεt3, provided that the subrange extends over four decades in energy, and a suitable origin is chosen for the time t. The constant GΔ is computed and is equal to 0.1 (which is close to Tatarski's 1960 estimate of 0.06); (e) difference statistics (i.e. displacement from the initial trajectory) of single particles are also calculated. The exact result that Y2 = GYεt3 with GY = 2πCL is approximately confirmed (although it requires an even larger inertial subrange than that for 〈Δ2〉). It is found that the ratio [Rscr ]G = 2〈Y2〉/〈Δ2〉≈ 100, whereas in previous estimates [Rscr ]G≈ 1, because for much of the time pairs of particles move together around vortical regions and only separate for the proportion of the time (of O(fc)) they spend in straining regions where streamlines diverge. It is estimated that [Rscr ]GO(fc−3). Thus relative diffusion is both a ‘structural’ (or ‘topological’) process as well as an intermittent inverse cascade process determined by increasing eddy scales as the particles separate; (f) statistics of large-scale turbulence are also computed, including the Lagrangian timescale, the pressure spectra and correlations, and these agree with predictions of Batchelor (1951), Hinzc (1975) and George et al. (1984).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1992 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anselmet, F., Gagne, Y., Hopfinger, E. J & Antonia, R. A. 1984 Higher-order velocity structure functions in turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 6389.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1951 Pressure fluctuations in isotropic turbulence. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 47, 359374.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1953 The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence. Cambridge University Press.
Batchelor, G. K. 1959 Small-scale variation of convected quantities like temperature in turbulent fluid. Part 1. General discussion and the case of small conductivity. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 113133.Google Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Townsend, A. A. 1947 Decay of vorticity in isotropic turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 190, 534560.Google Scholar
Broadwell, J. F. & Breidenthal, R. E. 1982 A simple model of mixing and chemical reaction in a turbulent shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 397410.Google Scholar
Carruthers, D. J., Fung, J. C. H., Hunt, J. C. R. & Perkins, R. J. 1990 The emergence of characteristic (coherent?) motion in homogeneous turbulent shear flows. In Turbulence and Coherent Structures, Proc. Grenoble Conference 1989 (ed. M. Lesieur & O. Métais) Kluwer.
Carruthers, D. J. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1986 Velocity fluctuations near an interface between a turbulent region and a stably stratified layer. J. Fluid Mech. 165, 475501.Google Scholar
Chase, D. M. 1970 Space-time correlations of velocity and pressure and the role of convection for homogeneous turbulence in the universal range. Acustica 22, 303320.Google Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin, S. 1971 Simple Eulerian time correlation of full- and narrow-band velocity signals in grid-generated, isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 273337.Google Scholar
Drummond, I. T., Duane, S. & Horgan, R. R. 1984 Scalar diffusion in simulated helical turbulence with molecular diffusivity. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 7591.Google Scholar
Durbin, P. A. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1980 Dispersion from elevated line sources in turbulent boundary layers. J. Méc. 19, 679695.Google Scholar
Edwards, S. F. 1964 The statistical dynamics of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 239273.Google Scholar
Favre, A. J., Gaviglio, J. J. & Dumas, R. 1957 Space-time double correlations and spectra in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 313342.Google Scholar
Fermigier, M. 1980 Ph.D. dissertation, L' Pierre Et Marie Curie, Paris.
Fung, J. C. H. 1990 Kinematic simulation of turbulent flow and particle motions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Fung, J. C. H, Hunt, J. C. R., Perkins, R. J., Wray, A. A. & Stretch, D. 1991 Defining the zonal structure of turbulence using the pressure and invariants of the deformation tensor. In Proc. Third European Turbulence Conference, Stockholm, 1990 (ed. A. V. Johansson & P. H. Alfredsson). Springer.
George, W. K., Beuther, P. D. & Arndt, R. E. A. 1984 Pressure spectra in turbulent free shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 155191.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. M. 1963 Spectra of turbulence in a round jet. J. Fluid Mech. 15, 161173.Google Scholar
Grant, H. L., Stewart, R. W. & Moilliet, A. 1962 Turbulent spectra from a tidal channel. J. Fluid Mech. 12, 241268.Google Scholar
Hanna, S. R. 1981 Lagrangian and Eulerian time-scale relation in the daytime boundary layer. J. Appl. Met. 20, 242249.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
Hunt, J. C. R. 1973 A theory of turbulent flow round two-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 625706.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. 1985 Turbulent diffusion from sources in complex flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 17, 447485.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Auton, T. R., Sene, K., Thomas, N. M. & Kowe, K. 1988 Bubble motions in large eddies and turbulent flows. In Proc. Conf. Transient Phenomena in Multiphase Flow (ed. N. H. Afgan). Hemisphere.
Hunt, J. C. R., Buell, J. C. & Wray, A. A. 1987 Big whorls carry little whorls. NASA Rep. CTR-S87.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Fung, J. C. H., Malik, N. A., Perkins, R. J., Vassilicos, J. C., Wray A, A., Buell, J. & Bertoglio, J. P. 1991 Kinematics of small scale motions in homogeneous isotropic turbulence. In Proc. Third European Turbulence Conference, Stockholm, 1990 (ed. A. V. Johansson & P. H. Alfredsson). Springer.
Inoue, E. 1951 On turbulent diffusion in the atmosphere. J. Met. Soc. Japan 29, 246252.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1941 The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 30, 301305.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. 1962 A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence on a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 8285.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1966 Dispersion of particles pairs in homogeneous turbulence. Phys. fluids 9, 17281752.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1970 Diffusion by a random velocity field. Phys. Fluids 13, 2231.Google Scholar
Larchevêque, M. & Lesieur, M. 1981 The application of eddy-damped markovian closures to the problem of dispersion of particle pairs. J. Méc. 20, 113134.Google Scholar
Lee, M. J., Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1990 Structure of turbulence at high shear rate. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 561584.Google Scholar
Leslie, D. C. 1973 Developments in the Theory of Turbulence. Clarendon.
Lundgren, R. H. 1981 Turbulent pairs dispersion and scalar diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 111, 2757.Google Scholar
Malik, N. A. 1991 Studies in turbulent dispersion using kinematic simulation. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Cambridge.
Maxey, M. R. 1987 The motion of small spherical particles in a cellular flow field. Phys. Fluids 30, 19151928.Google Scholar
Moin, P. & Moser, R. D. 1989 Characteristic-eddy decomposition of turbulence in a channel. J. Fluid Mech. 200, 471510.Google Scholar
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 1975 Statistical Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 2. MIT Press.
Novikov, E. A. 1963 Random force method in turbulence theory. Sov. Phys. JETP 17, 14491453.Google Scholar
Obukhov, A. 1941 Spectral energy distribution in a turbulent flow. Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Ser. Geogr. i Geofiz. 5, 453466. (Translation: Ministry of Supply, p. 211097).Google Scholar
Perkins, R. J., Carruthers, D. J., Drayton, M. J. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1990 Turbulence and diffusion at density interfaces. In Phase-Interface Phenomena in Multiphase Flow (ed. G. F. Hewitt, F. Mayinger & J. R. Riznic), pp. 2130. Hemisphere.
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1987 A description of eddying motions and flow patterns using critical-point concepts. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19, 12555.Google Scholar
Peters, N. & Williams, F. A. 1988 22nd Symp. on Combustion, Seattle.
Reeks, M. W. 1977 On the dispersion of small particles suspended in an isotropic turbulent fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 529546.Google Scholar
Richardson, L. F. 1926 Atmospheric diffusion shown on a distance-neighbour graph. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 110, 709737.Google Scholar
Rogallo, R. S. & Moin, P. 1984 Numerical simulation of turbulent flows. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 16, 99157.Google Scholar
Schwarz, K. W. 1990 Evidence for organized small-scale structure in fully developed turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 415418.Google Scholar
Shlien, D. J. & Corrsin, S. 1974 A measurement of Lagrangian velocity autocorrelations in approximately isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 62, 225271.Google Scholar
Snyder, W. H. & Lumley, J. L. 1971 Some measurements of particle velocity autocorrelation functions in a turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 4771.Google Scholar
Squires, K. D. 1990 The interaction of particles with homogeneous turbulence. Ph.d. dissertation, University of Stanford.
Tatarski, V. I. 1960 Radiophysical methods of investigating atmospheric turbulence. Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved. 3 Radiofizika 4, 551583.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1921 Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 20, 196211.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. 1975 Eulerian and Lagrangian time microscales in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 67, 561567.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. 1987 Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 529556.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. 1990 A stochastic model for the motion of particle pairs in isotropic high Reynolds number turbulence, and its application to the problem of concentration variance. J. Fluid Mech. 210, 113153.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Turfus, C. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1987 A stochastic analysis of the displacements of fluid element in inhomogeneous turbulence using Kraichnan's method of random modes. In Advances in Turbulence (ed. G. Comte-Bellot & J. Mathieu), pp. 191203. Springer.
Van Atta, C. W. & Chen, W. Y. 1970 Structure functions of turbulence in the atmospheric boundary layer over the ocean. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 147159.Google Scholar
Vincent, V. & Meneguzzi, M. 1991 The spatial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 120.Google Scholar
Wilkins, E. M. 1958 Observations on the separation of pairs of neutral balloons and applications to atmospheric diffusion theory. J. Met. 17, 324327.Google Scholar
Wray, A. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1990 Algorithms for classification of turbulent structures. In Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Topological Fluid Mechanics (ed. H. K. Moffatt & A. Tsinober), pp. 95104. Cambridge University Press.
Yeung, P. K. & Pope, S. B. 1989 Lagrangian statistics from direct numerical simulations of isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 207, 531586.Google Scholar