Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-846f6c7c4f-544bb Total loading time: 0.378 Render date: 2022-07-07T14:18:19.884Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Charles Meneveau
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Thomas S. Lund
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
William H. Cabot
Affiliation:
Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA

Abstract

The dynamic model for large-eddy simulation of turbulence samples information from the resolved velocity field in order to optimize subgrid-scale model coefficients. When the method is used in conjunction with the Smagorinsky eddy-viscosity model, and the sampling process is formulated in a spatially local fashion, the resulting coefficient field is highly variable and contains a significant fraction of negative values. Negative eddy viscosity leads to computational instability and as a result the model is always augmented with a stabilization mechanism. In most applications the model is stabilized by averaging the relevant equations over directions of statistical homogeneity. While this approach is effective, and is consistent with the statistical basis underlying the eddy-viscosity model, it is not applicable to complex-geometry inhomogeneous flows. Existing local formulations, intended for inhomogeneous flows, are most commonly stabilized by artificially constraining the coefficient to be positive. In this paper we introduce a new dynamic model formulation, that combines advantages of the statistical and local approaches. We propose to accumulate the required averages over flow pathlines rather than over directions of statistical homogeneity. This procedure allows the application of the dynamic model with averaging to in-homogeneous flows in complex geometries. We analyse direct numerical simulation data to document the effects of such averaging on the Smagorinsky coefficient. The characteristic Lagrangian time scale over which the averaging is performed is chosen based on measurements of the relevant Lagrangian autocorrelation functions, and on the requirement that the model be purely dissipative, guaranteeing numerical stability when coupled with the Smagorinsky model. The formulation is tested in forced and decaying isotropic turbulence and in fully developed and transitional channel flow. In homogeneous flows, the results are similar to those of the volume-averaged dynamic model, while in channel flow, the predictions are slightly superior to those of the spatially (planar) averaged dynamic model. The relationship between the model and vortical structures in isotropic turbulence, as well as ejection events in channel flow, is investigated. Computational overhead is kept small (about 10% above the CPU requirements of the spatially averaged dynamic model) by using an approximate scheme to advance the Lagrangian tracking through first-order Euler time integration and linear interpolation in space.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akselvoll, K. & Moin, P. 1993 Application of the dynamic localization model to large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step. In Engineering Applications to Large-Eddy Simulation (ed. U. Piomelli & S. Ragab), pp. 16. ASME.
Bardina, J., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1980 Improved subgrid scale models for large eddy simulation. AIAA Paper 80-1357.Google Scholar
Briscolini, M. & Santangelo, P. 1994 The non-Gaussian statistics of the velocity field in low-resolution large-eddy simulation of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 270, 199217.Google Scholar
Carati, D., Ghosal, S. & Moin, P. 1995 On the representation of backscatter in dynamic localization models. Phys. Fluids 7, 606616.Google Scholar
Chasnov, J. R. 1991 Simulation of the Kolmogorov inertial subrange using an improved subgrid model. Phys. Fluids A 3, 188200.Google Scholar
Chollet, J. P. & Lesieur, M. 1981 Parameterization of small scales of three-dimensional isotropic turbulence utilizing spectral closures. J. Atmos. Sci. 38, 27472757.Google Scholar
Clark, R. A., Ferziger, J. H. & Reynolds, W. C. 1979 Evaluation of subgrid-scale turbulence models using an accurately simulated turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 116.Google Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin, S. 1971 Simple Eulerian time correlation in full and narrow band velocity signals in grid generated, isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 273337.Google Scholar
Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P. & Cabot, W. H. 1991 A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model. Phys. Fluids A 3, 17601765.Google Scholar
Ghosal, S., Lund, T. S., Moin, P. & Akselvoll, K. 1995 A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 286, 229255.Google Scholar
Hussain, A. K. M. F. & Reynolds, W. C. 1970 The mechanics of a perturbation wave in turbulent shear flow. Stanford Univ. Dept. of Mech. Eng. Rep. FM-6.Google Scholar
Jimenez, J., Wray, A. A., Saffman, P. G. & Rogallo, R. S. 1993 The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 6590.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133166.Google Scholar
Kraichnan, R. H. 1976 Eddy viscosity in two and three dimensions. J. Atmos. Sci. 33, 15211576.Google Scholar
Leith, C. 1990 Stochastic backscatter in a subgrid-scale model: plane shear mixing layer. Phys. Fluids A 2, 297299.Google Scholar
Leslie, D. C. & Quarini, G. L. 1979 The application of turbulence theory to the formulation of subgrid modelling procedures. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 6591.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1967 The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. In Proc. IBM Sci. Comput. Symp. on Environmental Sciences, IBM Form No. 320-1951, pp. 195210.Google Scholar
Lilly, D. K. 1992 A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method Phys. Fluids A 4, 633635.Google Scholar
Liu, S., Meneveau, C. & Katz, J. 1994 On the properties of similarity subgrid-scale models as deduced from measurements in a turbulent jet. J. Fluid Mech. 275, 83119.Google Scholar
Liu, S., Meneveau, C. & Katz, J. 1995 Experimental study of similarity SGS models of turbulence in the far-field of a jet. Appl. Sci. Res. 54, 177190.Google Scholar
Lund, T. S., Ghosal, S & Moin, P. 1993 Numerical experiments with highly-variable eddy viscosity models. In Engineering Applications to Large-Eddy Simulation (ed. U. Piomelli & S. Ragab), pp. 711.
Lund, T. S. & Novikov, E. A. 1992 Parameterization of subgrid-scale stress by the velocity gradient tensor. In Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, pp. 2743.
Mason, P. & Thomson, D. 1992 Stochastic backscatter in large-eddy simulations of boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 242, 5178.Google Scholar
McMillan, O. J. & Ferziger, J. H. 1979 Direct testing of subgrid-scale models. AIAA J. 17, 13401346.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. 1994 Statistics of turbulence subgrid-scale stresses: Necessary conditions and experimental tests. Phys. Fluids 6, 815833.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C. & Lund, T. S. 1994 On the Lagrangian nature of the turbulence energy cascade. Phys. Fluids 6, 28202825.Google Scholar
Meneveau, C., Lund, T. S. & Moin, P. 1992 Search for subgrid scale parameterization by projection pursuit regression. In Proc. Summer Program 1992 Stanford University, vol IV, pp. 6181.Google Scholar
Moin, P. 1991 A new approach for large eddy simulation of turbulence and scalar transport. In New Approaches and Concepts in Turbulence, Proc. Monte Verita Coll. on Turbulence (ed. T. Dracos & A. Tsinober). Birkhauser, Bale.
Morris, P. & Ferziger, J. H. 1994 The 2–4 dynamic model for large-eddy simulations (Abstract only). Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 39, 1896.Google Scholar
Piomelli, U. 1993 High Reynolds number calculations using the dynamic subgrid-scale stress model. Phys. Fluids A 5, 14841490.Google Scholar
Piomelli, U. & Liu, J. 1995 Large-eddy simulation of rotating channel flows using a localized dynamic model. Phys. Fluids 7, 839848.Google Scholar
Piomelli, U. & Zang, T. A. 1991 Large-eddy simulation of transitional channel flow. Comp. Phys. Commun. 65, 224230.Google Scholar
Rogallo, R. 1981 Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence. NASA Tech. Memo 81315.Google Scholar
Schumann, U. 1995 Stochastic backscatter of turbulence energy and scaler variance by random subgrid-scale fluxes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 451, 293318.Google Scholar
Scotti, A., Meneveau, C. & Lilly, D. K. 1993 Generalized Smagorinsky model for anisotropic grids. Phys. Fluids A 5, 23062308.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. & Meneguzzi, M. 1991 The spatial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 120.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. & Squires, K. D. 1996 Large-eddy simulation of particle-laden turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 8, 12071223.Google Scholar
Wu, X. & Squires, K. D. 1995 Large eddy simulation of a canonical three-dimensional boundary layer. In Proc. Tenth Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flows, Penn State (ed. F. Durst, B. E. Launder, F. W. Schmidt & J. W. Whitelaw).
Zang, T. A., Gilbert, N. & Kleiser, L. 1990 Direct numerical simulation of the transitional zone. In Instability and Transition (ed M. Y. Hussaini & R. G. Voigt), pp. 283299.
Zang, Y., Street, R. L. & Koseff, J. 1993 A dynamic mixed subgrid-scale model and its application to turbulent recirculating flows. Phys. Fluids A 5, 31863196.Google Scholar
812
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *