Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-96qlp Total loading time: 0.336 Render date: 2022-12-06T01:57:04.118Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Multi-fidelity modelling of mixed convection based on experimental correlations and numerical simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2016

H. Babaee*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Sea Grant College Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
P. Perdikaris
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Sea Grant College Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
C. Chryssostomidis
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, MIT Sea Grant College Program, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
G. E. Karniadakis
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: babaee@mit.edu

Abstract

For thermal mixed-convection flows, the Nusselt number is a function of Reynolds number, Grashof number and the angle between the forced- and natural-convection directions. We consider flow over a heated cylinder for which there is no universal correlation that accurately predicts Nusselt number as a function of these parameters, especially in opposing-convection flows, where the natural convection is against the forced convection. Here, we revisit this classical problem by employing modern tools from machine learning to develop a general multi-fidelity framework for constructing a stochastic response surface for the Nusselt number. In particular, we combine previously developed experimental correlations (low-fidelity model) with direct numerical simulations (high-fidelity model) using Gaussian process regression and autoregressive stochastic schemes. In this framework the high-fidelity model is sampled only a few times, while the inexpensive empirical correlation is sampled at a very high rate. We obtain the mean Nusselt number directly from the stochastic multi-fidelity response surface, and we also propose an improved correlation. This new correlation seems to be consistent with the physics of this problem as we correct the vectorial addition of forced and natural convection with a pre-factor that weighs differently the forced convection. This, in turn, results in a new definition of the effective Reynolds number, hence accounting for the ‘incomplete similarity’ between mixed convection and forced convection. In addition, due to the probabilistic construction, we can quantify the uncertainty associated with the predictions. This information-fusion framework is useful for elucidating the physics of the flow, especially in cases where anomalous transport or interesting dynamics may be revealed by contrasting the variable fidelity across the models. While in this paper we focus on the thermal mixed convection, the multi-fidelity framework provides a new paradigm that could be used in many different contexts in fluid mechanics including heat and mass transport, but also in combining various levels of fidelity of models of turbulent flows.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2016 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acrivos, A. 1966 On the combined effect of forced and free convection heat transfer in laminar boundary layer flows. Chem. Engng Sci. 21 (4), 343352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babaee, H., Acharya, S. & Wan, X. 2013a Optimization of forcing parameters of film cooling effectiveness. Trans. ASME J. Turbomach. 136 (6), 061016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babaee, H., Wan, X. & Acharya, S. 2013b Effect of uncertainty in blowing ratio on film cooling effectiveness. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 136 (3), 031701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badr, H. M. 1984 Laminar combined convection from a horizontal cylinder – parallel and contra flow regimes. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 27 (1), 1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, S. W. 1977 A comprehensive correlating equation for laminar, assisting, forced and free convection. AIChE J. 23 (1), 1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, S. W. 2014 Equivalents – a new concept for the prediction and interpretation of thermal convection. Ind. Engng Chem. Res. 53 (10), 41044118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, S. W. & Usagi, R. 1972 A general expression for the correlation of rates of transfer and other phenomena. AIChE J. 18 (6), 11211128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damianou, A. C. & Lawrence, N. D. 2013 Deep gaussian processes. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pp. 207215.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. & Vlachos, P. P. 2009 Digital particle image velocimetry (dpiv) robust phase correlation. Meas. Sci. Technol. 20 (5), 055401.Google Scholar
Forrester, A., Sobester, A. & Keane, A. 2008 Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratiet, L. L. & Garnier, J. 2014 Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity. Intl J. Uncertainty Quant. 4, 365386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton, A. P., James, D. D. & Swire, H. W. 1970 Combined forced and natural convection with low-speed air flow over horizontal cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensman, J., Fusi, N. & Lawrence, N. D.2013 Gaussian processes for big data. arXiv:1309.6835.Google Scholar
Hu, H. & Koochesfahani, M. M. 2011 Thermal effects on the wake of a heated circular cylinder operating in mixed convection regime. J. Fluid Mech. 685, 235270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karniadakis, G. E. & Sherwin, S. J. 2005 Spectral/hp Element Methods for Computational Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, M. C. & O’Hagan, A. 2000 Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87 (1), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemlich, R. & Hoke, R. 1956 A common basis for the correlation of forced and natural convection to horizontal cylinders. AIChE J. 2 (2), 249250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattos, C. L. C., Dai, Z., Damianou, A., Forth, J., Barreto, G. A. & Lawrence, N. D.2015 Recurrent gaussian processes. arXiv:1511.06644.Google Scholar
Oosthuizen, P. H. & Madan, S. 1971 The effect of flow direction on combined convective heat transfer from cylinders to air. Trans. ASME J. Heat Transfer 93 (2), 240242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patnaik, B. S. V., Narayana, P. A. A. & Seetharamu, K. N. 1999 Numerical simulation of vortex shedding past a circular cylinder under the influence of buoyancy. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 42 (18), 34953507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdikaris, P. & Karniadakis, G. E. 2016 Model inversion via multi-fidelity bayesian optimization. J. R. Soc. Interface 13 (118).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perdikaris, P., Venturi, D., Royset, J. O. & Karniadakis, G. E. 2015 Multi-fidelity modelling via recursive co-kriging and gaussian–markov random fields. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 471, 20150018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, F., Gharib, M., Dabiri, D. & Modarress, D. 2000 Defocusing digital particle image velocimetry: a 3-component 3-dimensional dpiv measurement technique. application to bubbly flows. Exp. Fluids 29 (1), S078S084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, C. E.2006 Gaussian processes for machine learning.Google Scholar
Ronald, J. A. 1991 Particle-imaging techniques for experimental fluid mechanics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23 (1), 261304.Google Scholar
Sharma, A. & Eswaran, V. 2004 Effect of aiding and opposing buoyancy on the heat and fluid flow across a square cylinder at re = 100. Numer. Heat Transfer 45 (6), 601624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snelson, E. & Ghahramani, Z. 2006 Sparse gaussian processes using pseudo-inputs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 12571264. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sparrow, E. M. & Lee, L. 1976 Analysis of mixed convection about a horizontal cylinder. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 19 (2), 229232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Multi-fidelity modelling of mixed convection based on experimental correlations and numerical simulations
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Multi-fidelity modelling of mixed convection based on experimental correlations and numerical simulations
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Multi-fidelity modelling of mixed convection based on experimental correlations and numerical simulations
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *