Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-846f6c7c4f-msmtk Total loading time: 0.315 Render date: 2022-07-06T17:12:52.295Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Observations and scaling of travelling bubble cavitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Y. Kuhn De Chizelle
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
S. L. Ceccio
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
C. E. Brennen
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Abstract

Recent observations of growing and collapsing bubbles in flows over axisymmetric headforms have revealed the complexity of the ‘micro-fluid-mechanics’ associated with these bubbles (van der Meulen & van Renesse 1989; Briancon-Marjollet et al. 1990; Ceccio & Brennen 1991). Among the complex features observed were the bubble-to-bubble and bubble-to-boundary-layer interactions which leads to the shearing of the underside of the bubble and alters the collapsing process. All of these previous tests, though, were performed on small headform sizes. The focus of this research is to analyse the scaling effects of these phenomena due to variations in model size, Reynolds number and cavitation number. For this purpose, cavitating flows over Schiebe headforms of different sizes (5.08, 25.4 and 50.8 cm in diameter) were studied in the David Taylor Large Cavitation Channel (LCC). The bubble dynamics captured using high-speed film and electrode sensors are presented along with the noise signals generated during the collapse of the cavities.

In the light of the complexity of the dynamics of the travelling bubbles and the important bubble/bubble interactions, it is clear that the spherical Rayleigh-Plesset analysis cannot reproduce many of the phenomena observed. For this purpose an unsteady numerical code was developed which uses travelling sources to model the interactions between the bubble (or bubbles) and the pressure gradients in the irrotational flow outside the boundary layer on the headform. The paper compares the results of this numerical code with the present experimental results and demonstrates good qualitative agreement between the two.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1995 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arakeri, V. H. & Shanmuganathan, V. 1985 On the evidence for the effect of bubble interference on cavitation noise. J. Fluid Mech. 159, 131150.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. & Ellis, A. T. 1966 The collapse of cavitation bubbles and the pressures thereby produced against solid boundaries. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 260, 221240.Google Scholar
Billet, M. L. & Holl, J. W. 1979 Scale effects on various types of limited cavitation. ASME Intl Symp. on Cavitation Inception, pp. 1124.Google Scholar
Blake, F. G. 1949 The onset of cavitation in liquids: I. Acoustics Res. Lab., Harvard Univ., Tech. Memo. 12.Google Scholar
Blake, W. K. 1986 Mechanics of Flow-induced Sound and Vibration. Academic.
Blake, W. K., Wolpert, M. J. & Geib, F. E. 1977 Cavitation noise and inception as influenced by boundary-layer development on a hydrofoil. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 617640.Google Scholar
Brennen, C. E. & Ceccio, S. L. 1989 Recent observations on cavitation and cavitation noise. Proc. ASME 3rd Intl Symp. on Cavitation Noise and Erosion in Fluid Systems, FED 88, pp. 6778.Google Scholar
Briancon-Marjollet, L., Franc, J. P. & Michel, J. M. 1990 Transient bubbles interacting with an attached cavity and the boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 218, 355376.Google Scholar
Ceccio, S. L. 1990 Observations of the dynamics and acoustics of travelling bubble cavitation. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Ceccio, S. L. & Brennen, C. E. 1991 Observations of the dynamics and acoustics of travelling bubble cavitation. J. Fluid Mech. 233, 633660.Google Scholar
Chahine, G., Duraiswami, R. & Rebut, M. 1992 Analytical and numerical study of large bubble/bubble and bubble/flow interactions. Proc 19th Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, pp. 679699.Google Scholar
Ellis, A. T. 1952 Observations on cavitation bubble collapse. Calif. Inst. Tech. Hydr. Lab. Rep. 2112.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, H. M. & Strasberg, M. 1956 Hydrodynamic sources of sound. Proc. First ONR Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 241280. National Academy Press.
Fujikawa, S. & Akamatsu, T. 1980 Effects of the non-equilibrium condensation of vapour on the pressure wave produced by the collapse of a bubble in a liquid. J. Fluid Mech. 97, 481512.Google Scholar
Gilmore, F. R. 1952 The collapse and growth of a spherical bubble in a viscous compressible liquid. Calif. Inst. Tech. Hydr. Lab. Rep. 264.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. F., Thompson, D. E. & Billet, M. L. 1982 An experimental study of traveling bubble cavitation and noise. Proc. ASME Intl Symp. on Cavitation Noise, pp. 2533.Google Scholar
Hickling, R. & Plesset, M. S. 1964 Collapse and rebound of a spherical bubble in water. Phys. Fluids 7, 714.Google Scholar
Holl, J. W. & Carroll, J. A. 1979 Observations of the various types of limited cavitation on axisymmetric bodies. Proc. ASME Intl Symp. on Cavitation Inception, pp. 8799.Google Scholar
Holl, J. W. & Kornhauser, A. L. 1970 Thermodynamic effects on desinent cavitation on hemispherical nosed bodies in water at temperatures from 80 °F to 260 °F. Trans. ASME D: J. Basic Engng 92, 4458.Google Scholar
Holl, J. W. & Wislicenus, G. F. 1961 Scale effects on cavitation. Trans. ASME D: J. Basic Engng 83, 385398.Google Scholar
Huang, T. T. 1979 Cavitation inception observations on six axisymmetric headforms. Proc. ASME Intl Symp. on Cavitation Inception, pp. 5161.Google Scholar
Johnson, V. E. & Hsieh, T. 1966 The influence of the trajectories of gas nuclei on cavitation inception. Proc. 6th ONR Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 163182.Google Scholar
Kellogg, O. D. 1953 Foundations of Potential Theory. Dover.
Kimoto, H. 1987 An experimental evaluation of the effects of a water microiet and a shock wave by a local pressure sensor. Intl ASME Symp. on Cavitation Res. Facilities and Techniques, FED 57, pp. 217224.Google Scholar
Knapp, R. T. & Hollander, A. 1948 Laboratory investigations of the mechanisms of cavitation. Trans. ASME 70, 419.Google Scholar
Kuethe, A. M. & Chow, C. Y. 1986 Foundations of Aerodynamics. John Wiley and Sons.
Kuhn de Chizelle, Y. 1993 Hydrodynamics, acoustics and scaling of traveling bubble cavitation. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Kuhn de Chizelle, Y. & Brennen, C. E. 1993 Comparison of observed and calculated shapes of travelling cavitation bubbles. Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Bubble Dynamics and Interface Phenomena, Birmingham, UK, pp. 207217.Google Scholar
Kuhn de Chizelle, Y., Ceccio, S. L., Brennen, C. E. & Gowing, S. 1992a Scaling experiments on the dynamics and acoustics of travelling bubble cavitation. Proc. 3rd I. Mech. E. Intl Conf. on Cavitation, Cambridge, UK, pp. 165170.
Kuhn de Chizelle, Y., Ceccio, S. L., Brennen, C. E. & Shen, Y. 1992b Cavitation scaling experiments with headforms: bubble acoustics. Proc. 19th Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics, Seoul, Korea, pp. 7284. National Academy Press.
Kumar, S. & Brennen, C. E. 1993 A study of pressure pulses generated by travelling bubble cavitation. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 541564.Google Scholar
Lauterborn, W. & Bolle, H. 1975 Experimental investigations of cavitation bubble collapse in the neighbourhood of a solid boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 72, 391399.Google Scholar
Lindgren, H. & Johnsson, C. A. 1966 Cavitation inception on headforms. ITTC comparative experiments. Proc. 11th Intl Towing Tank Conf., Tokyo, pp. 219232.
Liu, Z., Kuhn de Chizelle, Y. & Brennen, C. E. 1993 Cavitation event rates and nuclei distributions. Proc. ASME Symp. on Cavitation Inception, FED 177, pp. 1324.Google Scholar
Meulen, J. H. J. van der & Renesse, R. L. van 1989 The collapse of bubbles in a flow near a boundary. Proc. 17th Symp. on Naval Hydrodynamics, The Hague, pp. 195217. National Academy Press.
Meyer, R. S., Billet, M. L. & Holl, J. W. 1989 Freestream nuclei and traveling-bubble cavitation. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 114, 672679.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. B. 1990 David Taylor Research Center's large cavitation channel. Proc. 19th Intl Towing Tank Conf., Madrid, Vol. 2, pp. 419427.
Naude, C. F. & Ellis, A. T. 1961 On the mechanism of cavitation damage by non-hemispherical cavities in contact with a solid boundary. Trans. ASME D: J. Basic Engng 83, 648656.Google Scholar
O'Hern, T., D'Agostino, L. & Acosta, A. J. 1988 Comparison of holographic and counter measurements of cavitation nuclei in the ocean. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 110, 200207.Google Scholar
Parkin, B. R. 1952 Scale effects in cavitating flow. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Plesset, M. S. 1949 The dynamics of cavitation bubbles. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 16, 228231.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1917 On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Phil. Mag. 34, 9498.Google Scholar
Schiebe, F. R. 1972 Measurements of the cavitation susceptibility of water using standard bodies. St. Anthony Falls Hydr. Lab., U. of Minnesota, Rep. 118.Google Scholar
Shen, Y. T., Gowing, S. & Pierce, R. D. 1984 Cavitation susceptibility measurements by a venturi. Proc. ASME Intl Symp. on Cavitation Inception, pp. 918.Google Scholar
Shima, A., Takayama, K., Tomita, Y. & Miura, N. 1981 An experimental study of effects of a solid wall on the motion of bubbles and shock waves in bubble collapse. Acustica 48, 293301.Google Scholar
Shima, A., Takayama, K., Tomita, Y. & Ohsawa, N. 1983 Mechanism of impact pressure generation from spark-generated bubble collapse near a wall. AIAA J. 21, 5569.Google Scholar
Vogel, A., Lauterborn, W. & Timm, R. 1989 Optical and acoustic investigations of dynamics of the laser-produced cavitation bubbles near a solid boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 206, 299338.Google Scholar
24
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Observations and scaling of travelling bubble cavitation
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Observations and scaling of travelling bubble cavitation
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Observations and scaling of travelling bubble cavitation
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *