Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-xt4p2 Total loading time: 0.591 Render date: 2022-05-29T08:26:45.419Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

On coherent structure in wall turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2013

A. S. Sharma*
Affiliation:
Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
B. J. McKeon
Affiliation:
Graduate Aerospace Laboratories, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: a.sharma@soton.ac.uk

Abstract

A new theory of coherent structure in wall turbulence is presented. The theory is the first to predict packets of hairpin vortices and other structure in turbulence, and their dynamics, based on an analysis of the Navier–Stokes equations, under an assumption of a turbulent mean profile. The assumption of the turbulent mean acts as a restriction on the class of possible structures. It is shown that the coherent structure is a manifestation of essentially low-dimensional flow dynamics, arising from a critical-layer mechanism. Using the decomposition presented in McKeon & Sharma (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 658, 2010, pp. 336–382), complex coherent structure is recreated from minimal superpositions of response modes predicted by the analysis, which take the form of radially varying travelling waves. The leading modes effectively constitute a low-dimensional description of the turbulent flow, which is optimal in the sense of describing the resonant effects around the critical layer and which minimally predicts all types of structure. The approach is general for the full range of scales. By way of example, simple combinations of these modes are offered that predict hairpins and modulated hairpin packets. The example combinations are chosen to represent observed structure, consistent with the nonlinear triadic interaction for wavenumbers that is required for self-interaction of structures. The combination of the three leading response modes at streamwise wavenumbers $6, ~1, ~7$ and spanwise wavenumbers $\pm 6, ~\pm 6, ~\pm 12$, respectively, with phase velocity $2/ 3$, is understood to represent a turbulence ‘kernel’, which, it is proposed, constitutes a self-exciting process analogous to the near-wall cycle. Together, these interactions explain how the mode combinations may self-organize and self-sustain to produce experimentally observed structure. The phase interaction also leads to insight into skewness and correlation results known in the literature. It is also shown that the very large-scale motions act to organize hairpin-like structures such that they co-locate with areas of low streamwise momentum, by a mechanism of locally altering the shear profile. These energetic streamwise structures arise naturally from the resolvent analysis, rather than by a summation of hairpin packets. In addition, these packets are modulated through a ‘beat’ effect. The relationship between Taylor’s hypothesis and coherence is discussed, and both are shown to be the consequence of the localization of the response modes around the critical layer. A pleasing link is made to the classical laminar inviscid theory, whereby the essential mechanism underlying the hairpin vortex is captured by two obliquely interacting Kelvin–Stuart (cat’s eye) vortices. Evidence for the theory is presented based on comparison with observations of structure in turbulent flow reported in the experimental and numerical simulation literature and with exact solutions reported in the transitional literature.

Type
Papers
Copyright
©2013 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, R. J. 2007 Vortex organization in wall turbulence. Phys. Fluids 19, 041301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrian, R. J., Christensen, K. T. & Liu, Z.-C. 2000a Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp. Fluids 29, 275290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adrian, R. J., Meinhart, C. D. & Tomkins, C. D. 2000b Vortex organization in the outer region of the turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J. C. & Jiménez, J. 2006 Linear energy amplification in turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 559, 205213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, S. C. C. & Smits, A. J. 2009 The structure of large- and very large-scale motions in turbulent pipe flow. AIAA Paper 2009-3684.Google Scholar
Balakumar, B. J. & Adrian, R. J. 2007 Large- and very-large-scale motions in channel and boundary layer flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 665681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandyopadhyay, P. R. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1984 The coupling between scales in shear flows. Phys. Fluids 27 (9), 22212228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benney, D. J. & Bergeron, R. F. 1969 A new class of nonlinear waves in parallel flows. Stud. Appl. Maths 48, 181204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourguignon, J.-L. & McKeon, B. J. 2011 A streamwise-constant model of turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 23, 095111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlier, J. & Stanislas, M. 2005 Experimental study of eddy structures in a turbulent boundary layer using particle image velocimetry. J. Fluid Mech. 535, 143188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chakraborty, P., Balachandar, S. & Adrian, R. J. 2005 On the relationships between local vortex identification schemes. J. Fluid Mech. 535, 189214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernyshenko, S. I., Cicca, G. M., Iollo, A., Smirnov, A. V., Sandham, N. D. & Hu, Z. W. 2006 Analysis of data on the relation between eddies and streaky structures in turbulent flows using the placebo method. Fluid Dyn. 41 (5), 772783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherubini, S., de Palma, P., Robinet, J.-C. & Bottaro, A. 2011 Edge states in a boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 23 (5), 051705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, D. & McKeon, B. J. 2010 Large-eddy simulation investigation of large-scale structures in a long channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 341364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossu, C., Pujals, G. & Depardon, S. 2009 Optimal transient growth and very large-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 619, 7994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deguchi, K & Nagata, M 2010 Traveling hairpin-shaped fluid vortices in plane Couette flow. Phys. Rev. E 82, 056325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, D. & Nickels, T. 2011a Experimental measurement of large-scale three-dimensional structures in a turbulent boundary layer. Part 1. Vortex packets. J. Fluid Mech. 673, 180217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, D. & Nickels, T. 2011b Experimental measurement of large-scale three-dimensional structures in a turbulent boundary layer. Part 2. Long structures. J. Fluid Mech. 673, 218244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 2004 Hydrodynamic Stability, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguet, Y., Willis, A. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2008 Transition in pipe flow: the saddle structure on the boundary of turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 613, 255274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duguet, Y., Willis, A. P. & Kerswell, R. R. 2010 Slug genesis in cylindrical pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 663, 180208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckhardt, B., Schneider, T. M., Hof, B. & Westerweel, J. 2007 Turbulence transition in pipe flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 39 (1), 447468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falco, R. E. 1977 Coherent motions in the outer region of turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 20, S124S132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falco, R. E. 1991 A coherent structure model of the turbulent boundary layer and its ability to predict Reynolds number dependence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 336 (1641), 103129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Longmire, E. K. & Marusic, I. 2003 Characteristics of vortex packets in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 478, 3546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, Q., Ortiz-Dueñas, C. & Longmire, E. K. 2011 Analysis of vortex populations in turbulent wall-bounded flows. J. Fluid Mech. 678, 87123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gayme, D. F., McKeon, B. J., Papachristodolou, A., Bamieh, B. & Doyle, J. C. 2010 Streamwise constant model of turbulence in plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 665, 99119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Generalis, S. C. & Itano, T. 2010 Characterization of the hairpin vortex solution in plane Couette flow. Phys. Rev. E 82, 066308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. F., Halcrow, J. & Cvitanović, P. 2009 Equilibrium and travelling-wave solutions of plane Couette flow. J. Fluid Mech. 638, 243266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guala, M., Hommema, S. E. & Adrian, R. J. 2006 Large-scale and very-large-scale motions in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 521542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. & Sherwin, S. J. 2010 Streamwise vortices in shear flows: harbingers of transition and the skeleton of coherent structures. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 178205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhyay, P. R. 1981 New aspects of turbulent boundary-layer structure. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 297337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellström, L. H. O., Sinha, A. & Smits, A. J. 2011 Visualizing the very-large-scale motions in turbulent pipe flow. Phys. Fluids 23, 011703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007a Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007b Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 647664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchins, N., Monty, J. P., Ganapathisubramani, B., Ng, H. C. H. & Marusic, I. 2011 Three-dimensional conditional structure of a high-Reynolds number turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 673, 255285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itano, T. & Generalis, S. C. 2009 Hairpin vortex solution in planar Couette flow: a tapestry of knotted vortices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 114501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobi, I. & McKeon, B. J. 2011 Dynamic roughness-perturbation of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 688, 258296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobi, I. & McKeon, B. J. 2013 Phase relationships between large and small scales in the turbulent boundary layer. Exp. Fluids 54, 1481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 6994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerswell, R. R. 2005 Recent progress in understanding the transition to turbulence in a pipe. Nonlinearity 18 (6), R17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. C. & Adrian, R. J. 1999 Very large-scale motion in the outer layer. Phys. Fluids 11, 417422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klewicki, J. C., Fife, P., Wei, T. & McMurtry, P. 2007 A physical model of the turbulent boundary layer consonant with the mean momentum balance structure. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 823839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. H. & Sung, H. J. 2011 Very-large-scale motions in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 673, 80120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeHew, J., Guala, M. & McKeon, B. J. 2011 A study of the three-dimensional spectral energy distribution in a zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer. Exp. Fluids 51 (4), 9971012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I., Mathis, R. & Hutchins, N. 2010 High Reynolds number effects in wall turbulence. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31, 418428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslowe, S. A. 1986 Critical layers in shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18 (1), 405432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, R., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2009 Large-scale amplitude modulation of the small-scale structures of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 628, 311337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathis, R., Marusic, I., Hutchins, N. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2011 The relationship between the velocity skewness and the amplitude modulation of the small scale by the large scale in turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 23, 121702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Li, J., Jiang, W., Morrison, J. F. & Smits, A. J. 2004 Further observations on the mean velocity distribution in fully developed pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 501, 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J. & Sharma, A. S. 2010 A critical layer model for turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 336382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Sharma, A. S. & Jacobi, I. 2010Predicting structural and statistical features of wall turbulence. arXiv:1012.0426.Google Scholar
McKeon, B. J., Jacobi, I. & Sharma, A. S. 2013 Experimental manipulation of wall turbulence: a systems approach. Phys. Fluids 25, 031301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meinhart, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 1995 On the existence of uniform momentum zones in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 7 (4), 694696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, A. & Trefethen, L. N. 2003 Linearized pipe flow to Reynolds number $1{0}^{7} $ . J. Comput. Phys. 186, 178197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monty, J. P., Hutchins, N., Ng, H. C. H., Marusic, I. & Chong, M. S. 2009 A comparison of turbulent pipe, channel and boundary layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 431442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monty, J. P., Stewart, J. A., Williams, R. C. & Chong, M. S. 2007 Large-scale features in turbulent pipe and channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 589, 147156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, S. C., Stolpa, S. R., Slaboch, P. E. & Klewicki, J. 2007 Near-surface particle image velocimetry measurements in a transitionally rough-wall atmospheric boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 580, 319338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullin, T. 2011 Experimental studies of transition to turbulence in a pipe. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43 (1), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natrajan, V. K., Wu, Y. & Christensen, K. T. 2007 Spatial signatures of retrograde spanwise vortices in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 574, 155167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Chong, M. S. 1982 On the mechanism of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech 119, 173217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E., Henbest, S. & Chong, M. S. 1986 A theoretical and experimental study of wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 163199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A. E. & Marusic, I. 1995 A wall-wake model for the turbulence structure of boundary layers. Part 1. Extension of the attached eddy hypothesis. J. Fluid Mech. 298, 361388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, C. C. T., Duguet, Y. & Kerswell, R. R. 2009 Highly symmetric travelling waves in pipe flow. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 367, 457472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, S. C., Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 1993 Pseudospectra of the Orr–Sommerfeld equation. SIAM J. Appl. Maths 53 (1), 1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 601639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, P. & Örlü, R. 2010 Quantifying the interaction between large and small scales in wall-bounded turbulent flows: a note of caution. Phys. Fluids 22, 051704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, P., Örlu, R., Li, Q., Brethouwer, G., Fransson, J. H. M., Johansson, A. V., Alfredsson, P. H. & Henningson, D. S. 2009 Simulations of spatially evolving turbulent boundary layers up to $R{e}_{\theta } = 4300$ . Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31, 251261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A. S. & McKeon, B. J. 2011 Very large-scale motions in pipe turbulence derived from a simple critical-layer model. In Seventh International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena (TSFP-7), Ottawa, Canada, 28–31 July. (online).Google Scholar
Smith, F. T. & Bodonyi, R. J. 1982 Amplitude-dependent neutral modes in the Hagen–Poiseille flow though a circular pipe. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 384, 463489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. R., Walker, J. D. A., Haidari, A. H. & Sobrun, U. 1991 On the dynamics of near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 336, 131175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, A. J., McKeon, B. J. & Marusic, I. 2011 High Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorsen, T. 1952 Mechanism of turbulence. In Proceedings of 2nd Midwestern Conference on Fluid Mechanics, Columbus, Ohio, pp. 119. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 2005 Energetic spanwise modes in the logarithmic layer of a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 545, 141162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Toonder, J. M. J. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 1997 Reynolds number effects in a turbulent pipe flow for low to moderate Re . Phys. Fluids 9, 33983409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1997 On a self-sustaining process in shear flows. Phys. Fluids 9 (4), 883900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waleffe, F. 2003 Homotopy of exact coherent structures in plane shear flows. Phys. Fluids 15 (6), 15171534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, H & Kerswell, R. R. 2004 Exact coherent structures in pipe flow: travelling wave solutions. J. Fluid Mech. 508, 333371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X., Baltzer, J. R. & Adrian, R. J. 2012 Direct numerical simulation of a $30R$ long turbulent pipe flow at ${R}^{+ } = 685$ : large- and very large-scale motions. J. Fluid Mech. 698, 235281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Y. & Christensen, K. T. 2006 Population trends of spanwise vortices in wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 568, 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
117
Cited by

Linked content

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

On coherent structure in wall turbulence
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

On coherent structure in wall turbulence
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

On coherent structure in wall turbulence
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *