Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T23:12:06.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the origin of the inflectional instability of a laminar separation bubble

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2009

SOURABH S. DIWAN
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
O. N. RAMESH*
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
*
Email address for correspondence: onr@aero.iisc.ernet.in

Abstract

This is an experimental and theoretical study of a laminar separation bubble and the associated linear stability mechanisms. Experiments were performed over a flat plate kept in a wind tunnel, with an imposed pressure gradient typical of an aerofoil that would involve a laminar separation bubble. The separation bubble was characterized by measurement of surface-pressure distribution and streamwise velocity using hot-wire anemometry. Single component hot-wire anemometry was also used for a detailed study of the transition dynamics. It was found that the so-called dead-air region in the front portion of the bubble corresponded to a region of small disturbance amplitudes, with the amplitude reaching a maximum value close to the reattachment point. An exponential growth rate of the disturbance was seen in the region upstream of the mean maximum height of the bubble, and this was indicative of a linear instability mechanism at work. An infinitesimal disturbance was impulsively introduced into the boundary layer upstream of separation location, and the wave packet was tracked (in an ensemble-averaged sense) while it was getting advected downstream. The disturbance was found to be convective in nature. Linear stability analyses (both the Orr–Sommerfeld and Rayleigh calculations) were performed for mean velocity profiles, starting from an attached adverse-pressure-gradient boundary layer all the way up to the front portion of the separation-bubble region (i.e. up to the end of the dead-air region in which linear evolution of the disturbance could be expected). The conclusion from the present work is that the primary instability mechanism in a separation bubble is inflectional in nature, and its origin can be traced back to upstream of the separation location. In other words, the inviscid inflectional instability of the separated shear layer should be logically seen as an extension of the instability of the upstream attached adverse-pressure-gradient boundary layer. This modifies the traditional view that pegs the origin of the instability in a separation bubble to the detached shear layer outside the bubble, with its associated Kelvin–Helmholtz mechanism. We contend that only when the separated shear layer has moved considerably away from the wall (and this happens near the maximum-height location of the mean bubble), a description by the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability paradigm, with its associated scaling principles, could become relevant. We also propose a new scaling for the most amplified frequency for a wall-bounded shear layer in terms of the inflection-point height and the vorticity thickness and show it to be universal.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alam, M. & Sandham, N. D. 2000 Direct numerical simulation of ‘short’ laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendat, J. S. & Piersol, A. G. 1966 Measurement and Analysis of Random Data. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Betchov, R. & Criminale, W. O. 1967 Stability of Parallel Flows. Academic.Google Scholar
Betchov, R. & Szewczyk, A. 1963 Stability of a shear layer between parallel streams. Phys. Fluids 6 (10), 13911396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boiko, A. V., Grek, G. R., Dovgal, A. V. & Kozlov, V. V. 2002 The Origin of Turbulence in Near-Wall Flows. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantwell, B. J., Coles, D. & Dimotakis, P. E. 1978 Structure and entrainment in the plane of symmetry of a turbulent spot. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 641672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, D. 1998 Evolution and instability of unsteady boundary-layers with reverse flow. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
Dovgal, A. V., Kozlov, V. V. & Michalke, A. 1994 Laminar boundary layer separation: instability and associated phenomena. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 30, 6194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1980 Turbulent flow reattachment: an experimental study of the flow and structure behind a backward-facing step. Tech Rep. MD-39. Deparment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, E. J. & Mueller, T. J. 1990 Measurements in a separation bubble on an airfoil using laser velocimetry. AIAA J. 28 (4), 584592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaster, M. 1967 The structure and behaviour of separation bubbles. ARC London R&M (3595).Google Scholar
Gaster, M. & Grant, I. 1975 An experimental investigation of the formation and development of a wave packet in a laminar boundary layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 347, 253269.Google Scholar
Haggmark, C. P., Bakchinov, A. A. & Alfredsson, P. H. 2000 Experiments on a two-dimensional laminar separation bubble. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 358, 31933205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, D. A. & Redekopp, L. G. 1998 Local and global instability properties of separation bubbles. Eur. J. Mech. B 17 (2), 145164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatman, A. & Wang, T. 1998 Separated-flow transition. Part 1. Experimental methodology and mode classification. Paper 98-GT-461. ASME.Google Scholar
Healey, J. J. 1998 Characterizing boundary-layer instability at finite Reynolds numbers. Eur. J. Mech. B 17 (2), 219237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, T. 1988 Secondary instability of boundary layers. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 487526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, H. P. 1969 A semi-empirical theory for the growth and bursting of laminar separation bubbles. ARC London (C.P. No. 1073).Google Scholar
Lang, M., Rist, U. & Wagner, S. 2004 Investigations on controlled transition development in a laminar separation bubble by means of LDA and PIV. Exp. Fluids 36, 4352.Google Scholar
Langston, L. S. & Boyle, M. T. 1982 A new surface-streamline flow-visualisation technique. J. Fluid Mech. 125, 5357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marxen, O., Lang, M., Rist, U. & Wagner, S. 2003 A combined experimental/ numerical study of unsteady phenomena in a laminar separation bubble. Flow Turbul. Combust. 71, 133146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslowe, S. A. 1986 Critical layers in shear flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 405432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maucher, U., Rist, U. & Wagner, S. 1999 Transitional structures in a laminar separation bubble. In New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics II (ed. Nitsche, W., Heinemann, H. J. & Hilbig, R.), vol. 72, pp. 307314. Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalke, A. 1964 On the inviscid instability of the hyperbolic-tangent velocity profile. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 543556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkewitz, P. A. & Huerre, P. 1982 Influence of the velocity ratio on the spatial instability of mixing layers. Influence of the velocity ratio on the spatial instability of mixing layers 25 (7), 11371143.Google Scholar
Narasimha, R. & Prasad, S. N. 1994 Leading edge shape for flat plate boundary layer studies. Leading edge shape for flat plate boundary layer studies 17 (5), 358360.Google Scholar
Nayfeh, A. H., Ragab, S. A. & Masad, J. A. 1990 Effect of a bulge on the subharmonic instability of boundary layers. Phys. Fluids A 2 (6), 937948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niew, T. R. 1993 The stability of the flow in a laminar separation bubble. PhD thesis, St John's College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pauley, L. L., Moin, P. & Reynolds, W. C. 1990 The structure of two-dimensional separation. J. Fluid Mech. 220, 397411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramesh, O. N., Hodson, H. P. & Harvey, N. W. 2001 Separation control in ultra-high lift aerofoils by unsteadiness and surface roughness. In Proc. of the Intl Society of Airbreathing Engines ISABE-1096, Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
Rist, U., Maucher, U. & Wagner, S. 1996 Direct numerical simulation of some fundamental problems related to transition in laminar separation bubbles. In Computational Fluid Dynamics '96 (ed. Desideri, J. A., Hirsch, C., Tallec, P. Le, Pandolfi, M. & Periaux, J.), pp. 319325. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1960 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. N., Gupta, A. K. & Oberai, M. M. 1981 Laminar separating flow over backsteps and cavities. Part 1. Backsteps. AIAA J. 19, 15271530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. R. & Strelets, M. Kh. 2000 Mechanisms of transition and heat transfer in a separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 403, 329349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taghavi, H. & Wazzan, A. R. 1974 Spatial stability of some Falkner–Skan profiles with reversed flow. Spatial stability of some Falkner–Skan profiles with reversed flow 17 (12), 21812183.Google Scholar
Tani, I. 1964 Low speed flows involving bubble separations. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 5, 70103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theofilis, V., Hein, S. & Dallmann, U. 2000 On the origins of unsteadiness and three-dimensionality in a laminar separation bubble. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 358, 32293246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanDyke, M. 1982 An Album of Fluid Motion. Parabolic.Google Scholar
Villermaux, E. 1998 On the role of viscosity in shear instabilities. On the role of viscosity in shear instabilities 10 (2), 368373.Google Scholar
Watmuff, J. H. 1999 Evolution of a wave packet into vortex loops in a laminar separation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 397, 119169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaman, K. B. M. Q. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1981 Turbulence suppression in free shear flows by controlled excitation. J. Fluid Mech. 103, 133159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar