Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wxk4p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T02:33:10.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parametrically excited, progressive cross-waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

John Miles  and
Janet Becker
John Miles
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Janet Becker
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The variational formulation of the nonlinear wavemaker problem, previously applied (Miles 1988) to cross-waves in a short tank, is extended to allow for slow spatial, as well as slow temporal, variation of cross-waves in a long tank. The resulting evolution equations for the envelope of the cross-waves are equivalent to those derived by Jones (1984) and may be combined to obtain a cubic Schrödinger equation in a semi-infinite domain. The corresponding criterion for the stability of plane waves (i.e. for the temporal decay of cross-waves) agrees with Jones but differs from Mahony (1972). Weak damping is incorporated, and those stationary envelopes that are evanescent at large distances from the wavemaker are determined through analytical approximations and numerical integration and compared with the experimental observations of Barnard & Pritchard (1972) and the numerical calculations of Lichter & Chen (1987). These comparisons suggest that stationary envelopes with either no or one maximum are stable for sufficiently small amplitudes (solutions with multiple maxima may be stable but more difficult to attain) and evolve into limit cycles for somewhat larger amplitudes, but the analytical question of stability remains open.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 186 , January 1988 , pp. 129 - 146
Copyright
© 1988 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnard, B. J. S. & Pritchard, W. G. 1972 Cross-waves. Part 2. Experiments. J. Fluid Mech., 55, 245–255.Google Scholar
Havelock, T. H. 1929 Forced surface waves on water. Phil. Mag, 8 (7), 569–576.Google Scholar
Jones, A. F. 1984 The generation of cross-waves in a long deep tank by parametric resonance. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 53–74.Google Scholar
Lichter, S. & Chen, J. 1987 Subharmonic resonance of nonlinear cross-waves. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 451–465.Google Scholar
Luke, J. C. 1967 A variational principle for a fluid with a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 27, 395–397.Google Scholar
Mahony, J. J. 1972 Cross-waves. Part 1. Theory. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 229–244.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1985 Note on a parametrically excited, trapped cross-wave. J. Fluid Mech. 151, 391–394.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1988 Parametrically excited, standing cross-waves. J. Fluid Mech. 186, 119–127.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord 1915 Deep water waves, progressive or stationary, to the third order of approximation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 91, 345–353; Scientific Papers, vol. 6, pp. 306–314. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. N. 1945 A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions, p. 383. Cambridge University Press.
Wu, J., Keolian, R. & Rudnick, I. 1984 Observation of a non-propagating hydrodynamic soliton. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1421–1424.Google Scholar