Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-xtmlv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-31T12:20:17.517Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Particle dynamics in a turbulent particle–gas suspension at high Stokes number. Part 2. The fluctuating-force model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
Email address for correspondence:


A fluctuating-force model is developed for representing the effect of the turbulent fluid velocity fluctuations on the particle phase in a turbulent gas–solid suspension in the limit of high Stokes number, where the particle relaxation time is large compared with the correlation time for the fluid velocity fluctuations. In the model, a fluctuating force is incorporated in the equation of motion for the particles, and the force distribution is assumed to be an anisotropic Gaussian white noise. It is shown that this is equivalent to incorporating a diffusion term in the Boltzmann equation for the particle velocity distribution functions. The variance of the force distribution, or equivalently the diffusion coefficient in the Boltzmann equation, is related to the time correlation functions for the fluid velocity fluctuations. The fluctuating-force model is applied to the specific case of a Couette flow of a turbulent particle–gas suspension, for which both the fluid and particle velocity distributions were evaluated using direct numerical simulations by Goswami & Kumaran (2010). It is found that the fluctuating-force simulation is able to quantitatively predict the concentration, mean velocity profiles and the mean square velocities, both at relatively low volume fractions, where the viscous relaxation time is small compared with the time between collisions, and at higher volume fractions, where the time between collisions is small compared with the viscous relaxation time. The simulations are also able to predict the velocity distributions in the centre of the Couette, even in cases in which the velocity distribution is very different from a Gaussian distribution.

Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Chapman, S. & Cowling, T. G. 1970 The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldhirsch, I. 2003 Rapid granular flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 267293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, P. S. & Kumaran, V. 2010 Particle dynamics in a turbulent particle–gas suspension at high stokes number. Part 1. Velocity and acceleration distributions. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 5990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. & Richman, M. W. 1985 Grad's 13-moment system for a dense gas of inelastic spheres. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 87, 355377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. & Savage, S. B. 1983 A theory for the rapid flow of identical, smooth, nearly elastic particles. J. Fluid Mech. 130, 186202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, D. L. 1990 Kinetic theory for a monodisperse gas–solid suspension. Phys. Fluids A 10, 17111723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 1997 Velocity distribution function for a dilute granular material in shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 340, 319341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 1998 a Kinetic theory for a vibro-fluidized bed. J. Fluid Mech. 364, 163185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 1998 b Temperature of a granular material “fluidised" by external vibrations. Phys. Rev. E 57, 56605664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2003 Stability of a sheared particle suspension. Phys. Fluids 15, 36253637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2004 Constitutive relations and linear stability of a sheared granular flow. J. Fluid Mech. 506, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2006 a The constitutive relations for the granular flow of rough particles, and its application to the flow down an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2006 b Granular flow of rough particles in the high-Knudsen-number limit. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 4372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2008 Dense granular flow down an inclined plane: from kinetic theory to granular dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 599, 121168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Koch, D. L. 1993 a Properties of a bidisperse particle–gas suspension. Part 1. Collision time small compared to viscous relaxation time. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 623642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Koch, D. L. 1993 b Properties of a bidisperse particle–gas suspension. Part 2. Viscous relaxation time small compared to collision relaxation time. J. Fluid Mech. 247, 643660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louge, M. Y., Mastorakos, E. & Jenkins, J. T. 1991 The role of particle collisions in pneumatic transport. J. Fluid Mech. 231, 345359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lun, C. K. K., Savage, S. V., Jeffrey, D. J. & Chepurniy, N. 1984 Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 223256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Jeffrey, D. J. 1981 The stress tensor in a granular flow at high shear rates. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 255272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, N. & Goldhirsch, I. 1998 Hydrodynamic equations for rapid flows of smooth inelastic spheres, to Burnett order. J. Fluid Mech. 361, 4174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sela, N., Goldhirsch, I. & Noskowicz, S. H. 1996 Kinetic theoretical study of a simply sheared two dimensional granular gas to Burnett order. Phys. Fluids 8, 2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsao, H.-K. & Koch, D. L. 1995 Shear flows of a dilute gas–solid suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 296, 211245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar